Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Rosie glow

VIP Member
Maybe the presenter has been told not to put out any kind of statement 🤔 if they are innocent and are never going to be named aren't they allowed some sort of dignity out of all of this mess
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

anonauntie

VIP Member
He has …based on defamatory claims
So IT is him then. I don’t even know what the story is anymore, and I had hoped it wouldn’t be him but to come on social media to like that posts does imply HE is the presenter. He could’ve easily made a tweet stating it’s not me etc or this has happened etc instead he likes those posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

InkHeart

VIP Member
Praying it’s not HE, but I think if it is there’s a huge chance that the worst part is him doing that to his children and wife and the story with the mother/child isn’t as it seems and there’s actually no wrong doing by HE. I think HE could very well be making himself look guilty even if he’s not. As says he has terrible depression, hates social media and is generally private. Maybe he is innocent and doesn’t actually have anything to say.
He must know by now that the bum photograph is circulating - if that was fake I'd expect him to issue a statement refuting it and saying he was getting lawyers in. Like, immediately. The picture's been up for about 24 hours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

anonauntie

VIP Member
So the presenter claims it’s rubbish. But the sun states they have seen evidence and have done nothing wrong in publishing what they did, it’s now upto the bbc to decide.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
This is FASCINATING because it really is a case of ‘unreliable narrator’
Do I trust the sun? No.
Do I trust the bbc? No
Do I trust the word of a mother who went to the paper and not the police? No
Do I trust the bbc presenter who wiped his insta this afternoon? No
And do I trust the 20 year old, potential drug addict? No.
But we are in an Uber liberal time now where everyone's voices must be treated individually.

Unfortunately not in the same sentence but because of Savilles legacy, and things like allowing Clarkson to bully crew the BBC has got a deep seated reputation to shake off. It's still a boy's club run by stereotypical middle-class white men.

The sun will have some proof of they wouldn't have posted it. The editor of the sun KM said that the print paper has less than a few years of even existing in it's current climate, so they can't afford to make mistakes.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 8

House of Tea

VIP Member
Maybe she was scared for her child seeing as they allegedly were using drugs, she may have thought her kid would be in trouble? She may have thought if she went to the source of the money to get it to stop her kid wouldn't have the funds for their habit ?
This has majorly backfired. He is probably on a retainer for a long time to keep schtum, plenty of money for drugs, or more hopefully private detox. Unless The Sun can prove he was lying about their being no impropriety. Squeaky bum time for The Sun, the BBC and Huw and the lad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

IrishMeeja

Chatty Member
well if he made 35k from this Man, depending on if the OF rumors are true could be making alot more than that.
Though if the parents saw his name on payments does that maybe rule OF out? If anyone knows about OF payments do they show names?
There’s no names or personal information. You just get a lump sum from all the various sales/subs.

It never sounded like OF to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

catdod5678

New member
the drugs stuff is irrelevant given we have former cabinet ministers and serving royals having acknowledged taking illegal substances and former prime ministers unable to remember if they did - the police don’t investigate or prosecute drug users
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

rocket1234

Well-known member
It still could be that everything is true apart from the fact it started when the young person was 17. If they started at 18, especially through a site like OF , then much as people may find it distasteful that a then 58 ish yr old straight married christian was paying to see an 18yr old perform sexual acts, it’s legal and there would be no grounds for an investigation. And probably a more more common than people would like to think
Yeah I agree. Obviously I don’t agree with the doing it behind his wife’s back and stuff. But each to their own. I’m team HE till I’m proved other wise with recipes. 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

pixxyy

VIP Member
I already know I'd be wasting my time with you. That's a given :cool:

And your assumptions about me are way off and quite vile.

Unless more substantive information comes out tomorrow, this whole disgusting saga should be a lesson in how mother doesn't know best, that females no know more than males, that misandry leads to a lot of false accusations based on almost nothing (nothing!), and that an innocent man has potentially been pushed near the edge because of a barmy mother going cap-in-hand to The Sun of all places! I assume The Times told her to sod off, or perhaps she is a Sun reader.
yup barmy mother lets keep with the parent blaming. The Woman has gained nothing from going to the BBC & The Sun in fact it looks like she's prob pushed her Son further away
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8