Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Gym&Tonic

VIP Member
Also can I tell you something if you were to ask most Welsh people, Derek Brockway would trump Huw Edwards in the national hero stakes. Bet no one outside of gods country has heard of him though 😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 13

Boring Monday

VIP Member
So the Mum is either lying (which is sick as fuck), or the victim has been paid off. Does make you wonder why HE deleted his Insta though. Literally all he had to do was say it wasn't him.

I'm leaning towards pay off, solely because how can the victim get hold of big-gun, top of the top lawyers? How on earth would they have that kind of money?
Or the mum and young person see the events in a completely different way And they are annoyed that she’s taken it this far.

The instagram could just be to stop comments and pictures being lifted.

Lawyers will take cases with a lot of publicity attached for reduced or no fee because the publicity is worth more it May be that they have negotiated a percentage of any income the young person gets from the case which could tip out at more than their fee anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

InkHeart

VIP Member
Not very bright....or a desperate parent worried about a kid with an addiction?
Both. Like I said in that post, loving an addict is horrible and I feel sorry for her. But she clearly expected the BBC could do something that they couldn't, then when they didn't, she assumed it was a neglect of duty on their part. Intelligence isn't a moral value, I'm just saying because people are asking why she behaved like this: I think she misunderstood a lot of things about how the world works. That doesn't mean she doesn't love her kid and was trying to do something to help him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

L3moning

VIP Member
So the presenter claims it’s rubbish. But the sun states they have seen evidence and have done nothing wrong in publishing what they did, it’s now upto the bbc to decide.
I have a suspicion that if The Sun are going to stick by this then they will name him. It's the only obvious escalation, and they don't have a lot to lose at this point, given they're almost certainly getting sued anyway, given the recent revelations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
For me there’s two issues here.
Firstly there’s the legal grey murkey area of nudes when someone is between 16-18. The law is clear that the nudes are illegal,though in practice this isn’t enforced due to the slightly contradictory nature of this alongside the 16 years old age of consent.

Secondly there’s the moral and ethics standpoint. BBC anchors are funded by taxpayers and with that comes in my view higher behaviour standards to adhere to. Paying money to a drug addicted teenager/young adult for sex pics with public money is a bad look. This wouldn’t be as bad if the person was older and matured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

okdo2022

VIP Member
Ok. So this “mother” went to the sun with a story. She must have had to produce some evidence to back the story up or their legal team would never have let them go to print with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

repairshoplover

VIP Member
So the young person via a lawyer has said nothing illegal took place and the police say there is no official investigation. I feel sad for this young person and the suggested named men.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Am I correct in making the assumption that if HE doesn’t appear in 59 minutes for news at 10 we can infer that he is the mystery sugar daddy?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 13

Bowbow82

VIP Member
Why if you do a search for Graham Norton it says he has been suspended for sexual misconduct occurring in May.....
The only article I could find was this


But never heard of this site and it might not be true. Can’t trust everything you read, as we can all see after what’s gone on today!

Take this article with a pinch of salt though!!!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 13

InTheDollsHouse

VIP Member
Nothing more reliable than the word of a teen crack addict, who has been selling pics of their genitals, and is no doubt under huge pressure from HE's lawyers.
Although the only person who says the young person is a crack addict is the mother.

A responsible lawyer would (I hope) be certain of their client’s mental capacity?

(Not disagreeing with you though, just another thought)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

givepeasachance

VIP Member
This reminds me of that time Leslie Grantham got his knob out over webcam in his BBC dressing room even though it is nothing like that time, it’s just that that whole thing came into my head and I thought everyone else should experience my pain.

Urhh the suggestive finger in mouth has stayed with me ever since. Stuff of nightmares
 
  • Haha
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 13

pommobear

VIP Member
Amazed at the amount of people making excuses for HE just because his public image up until know have been clean and family friendly. Reminds me of Jimmy Saville
How can we be making excuses for him when there is no evidence that he has even done anything yet?

Some people need to take a step back and look at what is actually in the public domain and confirmed as fact, because it isn't much.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13

Joannabloggs

VIP Member
If he's not actually a crack addict, maybe he's been saving up the money?
A retainer for a lawyer of that magnitude would be 10ks or 100ks of pounds and will run a credit check to see you can afford on goong costs, his legal fees must be being paid by someone else. What teenager do you know has that much money?!?! Law firms only do pro bond work generally for human rights or criminal cases.

Also you'd have to be on crack to enjoy that arse pic 🤢
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13

Shesaidwhat?

VIP Member
It could well be a pay off situation but I’ll be honest it always felt a bit off the mother never went to the police.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13