Or the mum and young person see the events in a completely different way And they are annoyed that she’s taken it this far.So the Mum is either lying (which is sick as fuck), or the victim has been paid off. Does make you wonder why HE deleted his Insta though. Literally all he had to do was say it wasn't him.
I'm leaning towards pay off, solely because how can the victim get hold of big-gun, top of the top lawyers? How on earth would they have that kind of money?
Both. Like I said in that post, loving an addict is horrible and I feel sorry for her. But she clearly expected the BBC could do something that they couldn't, then when they didn't, she assumed it was a neglect of duty on their part. Intelligence isn't a moral value, I'm just saying because people are asking why she behaved like this: I think she misunderstood a lot of things about how the world works. That doesn't mean she doesn't love her kid and was trying to do something to help him.Not very bright....or a desperate parent worried about a kid with an addiction?
“Look we caused this mess, but it’s actually your responsibility”It's all over sky news, the sun's statements saying they have receipts and want the BBC to get to the bottom of it .
This is insane, luckily I bought snacks.There’s just so much going on right now and I am so here for it. Wow.
I have a suspicion that if The Sun are going to stick by this then they will name him. It's the only obvious escalation, and they don't have a lot to lose at this point, given they're almost certainly getting sued anyway, given the recent revelations.So the presenter claims it’s rubbish. But the sun states they have seen evidence and have done nothing wrong in publishing what they did, it’s now upto the bbc to decide.
The only article I could find was thisWhy if you do a search for Graham Norton it says he has been suspended for sexual misconduct occurring in May.....
Although the only person who says the young person is a crack addict is the mother.Nothing more reliable than the word of a teen crack addict, who has been selling pics of their genitals, and is no doubt under huge pressure from HE's lawyers.
Well, I think we'd all enjoy that.Huw Edwards has just liked these two tweets! Law suit incoming?
This reminds me of that time Leslie Grantham got his knob out over webcam in his BBC dressing room even though it is nothing like that time, it’s just that that whole thing came into my head and I thought everyone else should experience my pain.
How can we be making excuses for him when there is no evidence that he has even done anything yet?Amazed at the amount of people making excuses for HE just because his public image up until know have been clean and family friendly. Reminds me of Jimmy Saville
Is the Pope Catholic?Wonder if they will go hard on this story on GB News?
A retainer for a lawyer of that magnitude would be 10ks or 100ks of pounds and will run a credit check to see you can afford on goong costs, his legal fees must be being paid by someone else. What teenager do you know has that much money?!?! Law firms only do pro bond work generally for human rights or criminal cases.If he's not actually a crack addict, maybe he's been saving up the money?
Any peaches?Thankfully I’ve not seen a dancing leek yet on baby tv cos I think I would lose it.
Right?! The Sun, that well known beacon of truth and integrity.You hold The Sun in much higher regard than most of the British public.