It kind of makes sense doesn’t it? I think you expressed it better. If there is no intent, this "we did everything possible to hide identity" just looks too lame - they are not that naive/ inexperienced surely. Interesting if Netflix is aware - probably not? But then wouldnt they check? Im so curious, but in reality we would probably never knowIt’s funny, I had that exact thought today! Talking to my wife about the lawyer interview. Saying it was a Scottish lawyer….married to an MP, she was tracked down quicker than FH! She made his life hell, she’s not really going to be punished, her victims are just so relieved to get rid of her relentless harassment as she moves on to another victim…with her track record she wouldn’t be able to resist the attention, an opportunity to get to Gadd again…this way everyone knows the woman is a fruit loop! They know to look out for her and if they’ve any sense stay out of her orbit! She also now has a taste of what harassment feels like! And she cannot help but lie and possibly do something that can finally get her sent away! Gadd knows the more wound up she gets the more vile she becomes! She’s going to drop herself in it!!
I think he knew she was a nutcase and didn’t want to push her too far.Piers is a bit of a bully but I don't think he went very hard on her compared to what I've seen him do with other people. I thought he was trying to be fair at least.
Exactly. No one forced Fiona to come and do and interview (that has now got 14m views.)All Netflix have done is asked an actress to put on a Scottish voice. Fiona states she's never been as big as 'Martha' in size (Fiona is a horrid person) . Even if they'd chosen a woman with a London accent, Fiona would still have come forward - she's an attention seeker
......and people knew of her after being in newspapers years ago - that gave her true name! She's known for her frequent stalking harassment.....Why didn't she sue the newspapers who revealed her true identity back then?Exactly. No one forced Fiona to come and do and interview (that has now got 14m views.)
she could’ve stayed in the shadows and waited for it to blow over.
she wants money and fame. I suspect Netflix will win. As someone mentioned above this is a true story of Donny and Martha. Not Richard and Fiona.
I’m not surprised by this at all.Richard Gadd's ex-colleague says his 'stalker' was targeted as a joke
Richard Gadd's ex-colleague says his 'stalker' was targeted as a joke
EXCLUSIVE: The bar worker claimed Fiona Harvey was among vulnerable women exploited by male members of staff at the Hawley Arms in Camden, north London.www.dailymail.co.uk
Well you could say that joke backfired, but he has what he wanted, fame. I thought it would be a matter of time until witnesses started coming forward.
It really is so disgusting! and so dated too. Like surely we’re passed this nonsense!It's sad she associates being gay with HIV like she does. She uses Gadd being gay as an insult against him. He's not gay, I'm right to say he's bisexual ? She's so venomous
If you know someone is a nutcase WHY give them a platform and opportunities to continue their abuse??? Piers did this for his own profile and money! This makes him a twat!!! I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, I hope to FUCK he becomes her next obsession and he understands what he has done for fucking clicks, likes and money! He’s part of the trendy ‘parasitic journalism’ that should be fucking quashed!! He’ll jump on any bandwagon, dress it up as ‘exclusive hard hitting news’ when it’s all for the sad pathetic bastards ego boost! Utter arsehole! And when she starts on his family I hope to fuck everyone tells him it’s COMPLETELY HIS OWN FUCKING DOING!!!I think he knew she was a nutcase and didn’t want to push her too far.
It would sort of serve him right at this point. Apparently he had Laura Wray on his show too - the solicitor who gave FH her first job. That poor woman was hounded for 5 years by FH who reported her to social services for abusing her child (a made up lie) and put her through hell.If she starts on Piers I honestly think he will just have her arrested. Don’t like the guy but he seems very no nonsense, he did say he’s got a thick skin because of his career so wasn’t bothered but I can’t imagine him tolerating it if she started on his family
If Fiona does get a pay out, I hope her victims sue her! She's vileIt would sort of serve him right at this point. Apparently he had Laura Wray on his show too - the solicitor who gave FH her first job. That poor woman was hounded for 5 years by FH who reported her to social services for abusing her child (a made up lie) and put her through hell.
Apparently she had to get some sort of court order to stop the harassment. Piers then had a discussion panel another day and dismissed FH as a troll not a proper stalker because she'd finally left Laura alone!
Laura found out that FH repeated her vile behaviour in her next job and after she was sacked by the next firm of solicitors she did exactly the same to her 2nd boss (a man this time) where she phoned social services and said he was abusing his children.
This whole debarcle pretty much points out why victims don’t come forward, because there’s always a bunch of dickheads that want to victim blame and turn a vile perpetrator into a ‘victim’…fucking disgusting!If Fiona does get a pay out, I hope her victims sue her! She's vile
Why is there no date of issue on that? Where is that from?
They need the enhanced for the trial.......it looks to me like that is an old one that Fiona herself has produced. My daughter had to apply for one back in 2018 for college (as she was working with vulnerable adults) - hers is green - like this :Spent convictions won’t show up on a basic CRB check
Yeah lawyer’s gonna need an enhanced check which discloses everything I think including cautions etcThey need the enhanced for the trial.......it looks to me like that is an old one that Fiona herself has produced. My daughter had to apply for one back in 2018 for college (as she was working with vulnerable adults) - hers is green - like this : View attachment 2993669
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?