Like being in a horror movieImagine going to view the house and having all those photos of Ashley staring at you from the walls.
I agree. In which case maybe it’s really true that he’s got a new job?I really am waiting for her to cry privacy issues and blame it on the ‘trolls’.
Hinch said it was privacy / problems with neighbours, then her husband had to state it wasn’t neighbours but was because of press intrusion. (When actually it was because they just wanted to move house but god forbid they just said so.)
It’s the suddenness that makes it so odd. And they’ve just had the garden done, made the big thing of entertaining outside etc. plus introduced Rara and said last week about Ada starting at the childminder.
She might even make the £250 for a New! or Take a Break story at the rate of this potential downfall.Loads of crying selfies
I think @MidnightRambler mentioned above (or someone else) that it was essentially to do with safeguarding & two parents can't be directors of their child's companies. So A.N Other adult has to also be involved.I wonder why Tommy isn’t named on the Alf&Ada company. It’s Ash and her brother. Isn’t that a bit insulting to TNB? And means if Ash and TNB split up, Ash effectively has total control.
Oh. This is the post. Definitely mis-read it.I said this at the time: Fuse help parents set up business affairs for children (and even animals sometimes) as it’s been a murky world where parents can be directors and take directors loan payments from their children’s earnings. Not even famous parents, think of the amount of random kids that are in anything from nappy ads to sweet, cereal, cleaning product adverts etc etc.
This has the added bonus of allowing Ashley to offset some taxable earnings as well I guess.
It’s all starting to look very desperate however, also makes me more certain than ever that she had the kids as a career move. Hasn’t gone too well for her!
It’s probably all totally fine but it would be more balanced if it were one of TNB’s family (eg Nana, who has an active part in the children’s lives) as the second person, rather than one of Ash’s siblings.I think @MidnightRambler mentioned above (or someone else) that it was essentially to do with safeguarding & two parents can't be directors of their child's companies. So A.N Other adult has to also be involved.
Happy to be corrected on this though.
---
Oh. This is the post. Definitely mis-read it.
Ohh yes!also interesting reading on the A.Rivers Property company - looks like it has been loaning money to Ash...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?