They both have god complexes. That mixed with narcissism is lethal.
I donāt think they realise that they will soon become two of the most disliked people on social media in a matter of months. All the brands working with them will ditch them and release statements disassociating themselves from the TAF brand.
Misusing charity funds is one thing, but when it comes to āsick childrenā, itās a complete different story.
They will need much stronger PR representation than that āCow titā agency, they will be needing legal representation. There are so many conflicts of interest, the orange branding used in āCLIB 100ā, the book, the merchandiseā¦ā¦..list goes on.
They are individually so intertwined with the charity that itās not clear what their personal projects are VS TAF projects. For example, TAF was a sponsor of Ashās failed boxing match. What does TAF sponsorship entail? Can anybody apply for sponsorship? How does them providing sponsorship further the charityās aims? How can they justify a sponsorship over a donation?
I read law (Law LLB), Iām going to see what case law there is out there with a similar set of facts that we see here. Sick of these two and the way they have abused the publicās good will.