Well, I don’t think there’s anything necessarily wrong with wanting to wait and hear all of the evidence from both sides before making a judgement in this particular case, given thatI feel like banging my head against a brick wall that so many people in the LL trial thread are “on the fence”, “waiting to hear all the facts”, she’s got 7 precious babies that she was near who have been killed to answer for, her garden has been dug up and there’s even f*cken notes in her handwriting saying “I killed them”. How on God’s earth is she not guilty.
she has been accused of 7 different murders and 22 (I think?) attempts, yet there is a lot of variation in the way they died and some of the deaths don’t really have much convincing evidence that it was her other than that she was involved in their treatment, so whilst I definitely think she could have done some, I wonder whether all of them can be attributed to her.
For me she has demonstrated some pretty inappropriate and unprofessional behaviour, and I definitely think there could have been some incompetency from her which lead to the babies dying, but I’m still not convinced she is a cold blooded murderer.
However, I am not a CTist so I am more than willing to have my mind changed depending on how the prosecution build up their case against her over the next few months.