I've noticed a lot of companies turn down applicants at interview because they don't seem a good "cultural fit" or words to that effect. Isn't that just a way of rejecting a candidate based on their age/race/sex without having to explicitly say so and being open to a lawsuit?
I've often heard
"... candidate who we feel would be a better fit" ... it could apply to a heap of things, but I suspect it's mostly due to age in my case.
I've started working for a telco, from home, doing customer support. I do enjoy the work, but the constant auditing - to check you're working when you should be (they have a webcam of sorts), listening in on your phone calls (while they're in progress, as well as during the formal auditing checks they do about call quality), are incredibly frustrating. Surely there needs to be a bit of trust that you will do the job to the best of your ability.
They also hold weekly catch-ups with your supervisor and someone from HR ... which is a bit weird ... the supervisor catch-ups are a great idea as they give you a chance to debrief and go over anything you might be able to do better, plus give you a chance to express any concerns or what-have you. But why does someone from HR need to be present? (HR attend
everyone's catch-up, not just mine ... I feel like they should only attend if it's a disciplinary matter?). My supervisor is so, so lovely but quite nosey about my personal life. It probably irks her that I'm a closed book about my private life though ... I tend to only share what they need to know.
Our catch-ups have been quite short so far - she listens in to four calls a day and rates them, plus makes comments about anything that could be improved on. The only thing she's pulled me up on so far is that I need to drink more water as I sound like I'm losing my voice at times (that's just me though - I can't control that ... I often have a raspy voice).