These comments are giving me so much life!
And also, please allow me to share: A friend and I were chatting last night about our dear AB (she reads here BTW),and we both agree that logos donāt necessarily make the wearer tacky. Of course, thereās a diffference between subtle/minimum visible logo versus bedecked in head-to-toe, in-your-face logo (and Iām sure you know what I mean!)
There are people who, out of sheer excitement for their first time big purchase (examples: an acquaintance who recently acquired a house and lot before his 30th birthday; another acquaintance who purchased a car with the money she worked hard for) share their proud moments on social media. These are simple people who canāt believe they were able to afford these things. Maybe itās unnecessary, but their choice to share the news with their friends is understandable.
For Anna, this kind of behavior is a no-no. It is not elegant and definitely not an affluent thing to do. This Anna, who once said she moves in the same exalted circle of the affluent people, prance around in (fake) designer stuff, the same ones she post on her social media accounts, among other things she deem aHhfLuenT.
My point here is, if you teach people not to wear logos when itās what you actually do (look at those pair of dark sunglasses and the H cut-out in Oran sandals), encourage people to buy big-name items just because you think itās what affluent people have yet you donāt own half of those things (fakes not counted!), you preach about manners while you go out there and film people while dining, or hurl clothes across the room, or call other women āfliesā, āratchetā, āplain janesā, etc Oh I can go on and onā¦ but what Iām saying is, IF YOU CONTRADICT WHAT YOU SAY, EXPECT PEOPLE TO JUDGE YOU.
View attachment 685283View attachment 685284View attachment 685285View attachment 685286View attachment 685287View attachment 685288View attachment 685289