A lot of this just comes down to people treating royal biographies and gossip cycles as if they’re confirmed fact, when in reality they’re often a mix of anecdote, interpretation, and speculation.based on royal autobiographies/biographies. Various stories it sounds like the boys were both brats and used to having their own way with Charles not wanting to upset them.men that grow up in those circles often see women as cheap (Harry and the girls he bight home with fiends in Spare) the stories o what they were like as younger boys in school/university.see the child see the man.
think after the gag order on the rose h stories I believe William had an affair, I can’t see Kate tolerating it when it’s too close to home.
It’s also a huge leap to take isolated stories about behaviour in school or early adulthood and turn that into a fixed assumption about how someone behaves in their marriage decades later.
What is it with some people who are so desperate to push the idea that William had an affair?
That rumour is from around 2019, and we are now 7 years further down the line, yet people are still going on about that internet rumour without any evidence. After those rumours, Catherine invited Rose and her husband to her birthday with close friends and family. Rose and her husband were even seen walking with Catherine’s parents—do people really think her parents would be walking with his alleged mistress? Catherine was also seen dining and socialising with Rose at her home after those rumours.
Rose has had lawyers involved to deny it, and Catherine’s very close sister named her daughter Rose—something she would hardly do if there was any truth to that rumour.
Just because people keep repeating it—and let’s be honest, it’s often fans of a certain couple or anti-monarchists—doesn’t mean there is any truth to it.