judgejohndeed
VIP Member
All law abiding citizens over here. All born and bred in the UK as were my ancestors before me.![]()
All law abiding citizens over here. All born and bred in the UK as were my ancestors before me.![]()
Can you really not understand that the fact that sending your children to private school is an option for you at all means that you have a certain level of privilege way beyond the capacity of most people? Assuming that you are way better off than a huge percentage of parents isn’t narrow minded, it’s a fact.Are you serious? I don’t mix with any of the school parents and have a very broad range of friends and family!! How narrow minded of you. Far from privileged; chose private school for smaller class sizes and chose not to move house and have to watch our spending to allow for school fees. I know families where they are that rich that voting labour and the tax will have no impact, yet I know families where it will have a huge impact. There is such a misgiving about the types of people who send their kids private.
Went to prison in the same way you might be sent to prison in Afghanistan if you were found to be giving girls an education. Presumably you know what it is to be a political prisoner.Went to prison…
---
Im here to engage. You just don’t like hearing the truth.
It's not narrow minded, it's just true of most people. People who can afford to send their kids to private schools aren't mixing with people from council estates. My heart bleeds that you have to watch your spending to send your kids to their posh fancy school...the very fact that you can send your kids with those huge fees, regardless of what 'sacrifices' you think you have to make, means you are hugely privileged in today's economy. I don't know why people who send their kids to private school can't accept that. I'm sure you do go without things, so do many parents who work several jobs literally just to keep their kids fed and a roof over their head! Get a grip.Are you serious? I don’t mix with any of the school parents and have a very broad range of friends and family!! How narrow minded of you. Far from privileged; chose private school for smaller class sizes and chose not to move house and have to watch our spending to allow for school fees. I know families where they ate that rich that voting labour and the tax will have no impact, yet I know families where it will have a huge impact. There is such a misgiving about the types of people who send their kids private.
Men literally cry because they lost a football game.You know how people always say things would be so much better if all the world leaders were women? Yeah, show them Rayner and Mordaunt on thisI say this as a woman who works in an office where all the leaders are women. Things get very shouty and emotional. Often.
Spot on.People's circumstances can and do change. We were well off when I was little but then my Dad left and my mum got too ill to work so we had nothing for a long time. Why are people so mean spirited about children? I have to say I don't resent a single penny of my taxes going to feed a hungry child, whether or not their parents are feckless layabouts - it's hardly their fault. I mean what do you want - forced sterilisation?!
And in the 1980s when we had our kids, did we have "much more" than our parents did 40 years before that? Was it a sign that we were profligate with our money or simply that society and technology had changed? Did our parents have tvs, cars, foreign holidays, fridges or freezers, indoor toilets, hot water on tap, central heating etc? I know my parents didn't. In the 1980s would you have been a 'Happy Lady' to go back to a 1940s lifestyle? Your comparison is simply perverse.Yes @Moth things are different, very different. I have previously posted that families these days have much more, therefore need finances to afford them. I'm talking about large TVs, mobile phones, cars, toys, etc.
And why do you think those have become necessary in the intervening 40 years? Could it be that more women than ever have had to return to the workplace full-time simply to pay the bills. And God forbid, some don't actually want to sacrifice their career simply because they have dared to have a child.However, there were never benefits to cover child care, breakfast or after school clubs, etc.
How many parents in a "well paid job" receive financial help?Things are so different, and I don't feel that so many parents should receive financial help if they hold a good, well paid job.
Unfortunately it's the prevalence of unenlightened opinions like yours that has led to the stereotyping of all 'boomers'Just my opinion.
They're a far right party so why would you vote for them if you weren't far right?You're implying that if you vote Reform then you're far right?
Brexit.View attachment 2974008
What a melt. She's barely old enough to have ever voted, what can Nigel have ever done to her to warrant that behaviour. Save the milkshakes for Sunak, it's his party that's been in charge of you most of your life petal.
I WANT Starmer to be boring. I would very much like boring, competent people in government.For me this election is getting rid of the Tories and getting back to a boring normal government. We shouldn't be this obsessed with what's going on and it shouldn't be so combative all the time. It makes me laugh people say Starmer is boring and goes on too much in his answers. Life is bloody complicated - you shouldn't be able to solve a big issue with a four word soundbite.