I'm really shocked and disappointed by the lack of empathy a lot of people have for the five people who died. I don't care how much money someone has, it's still incredibly sad.
I'd say we owe more to the engineers who poured all their knowledge and skill into researching and developing safe aircraft, and to the policymakers who took that knowledge on board (no pun unintended) and insisted on having enforceable aviation standards. Having a thirst for adventure and being willing to risk your life is just as likely to impair progress as to assist it.But planes of the past were not regulated and it’s only because brave pilots pushed boundaries that we now have the modern day aviation industry.
I have sympathy for the four passengers, especially the young man who it seems only went to please his father and was anxious about the voyage, he shouldn’t have been there in the first place in my opinion.I'm really shocked and disappointed by the lack of empathy a lot of people have for the five people who died. I don't care how much money someone has, it's still incredibly sad.
I had been trying to word exactly this for ages - thank you so much.I'd say we owe more to the engineers who poured all their knowledge and skill into researching and developing safe aircraft, and to the policymakers who took that knowledge on board (no pun unintended) and insisted on having enforceable aviation standards. Having a thirst for adventure and being willing to risk your life is just as likely to impair progress as to assist it.
I also struggle to see how OceanGate was in any way creative or innovative. Deep sea submersibles already exist, and scientists already know what the safest materials are and which tests should be performed to ensure a submarine is capable of descending to the depth of the Titanic. Sometimes scientific discovery does require risk, but it has to be a calculated one. This is why we perform organ transplants (an inherently risky thing) but we don't decide to chuck a dog's liver inside a human just to see if it might work (an even bigger risk with nothing to suggest it might improve transplantation science at all, and quite a lot to suggest that very bad things might happen as a result). Deciding to use materials that are already known to be weaker than titanium and refusing to fully test the sub's capabilities at depth is only "pushing boundaries" in the sense that using the dog's liver is pushing boundaries. The purpose was to save money, which is baffling coming from someone who had billions to spend.
Billionaires have such unfathomable wealth that no one could possibly spend it all in multiple lifetimes. Every future generation of the family could live off the interest alone. Billionaires are immoral and hoard wealth only for the sake of keeping it from others. They wake up every day and choose to let millions of people die when they could use their wealth to provide food, shelter, water, or medical care for literally whole countries. They can go duck themselves. I'll save my empathy for the 19 year old and the children of anyone lost.I'm really shocked and disappointed by the lack of empathy a lot of people have for the five people who died. I don't care how much money someone has, it's still incredibly sad.
He could've brushed his hair the scruffy cu#t.
Sadly this happens. Unless your opinion fits the majority, it becomes an invalid opinion.….
All these petty arguments are making me laugh is all, hence the side eye, get over yourself
Not sure where I said not to discuss the topic? Please enlighten me? Pretty sure I just contributed an opinion to the discussion, as I have been all week. Didn’t realise only certain members are allowed to discuss it.
I really think he did. He was obviously very wrong but this is literally why we have such tight regulation of almost all industries. You can't rely on people getting things right (even if they really tried). I hope a tighter regulatory regime comes from this situation.Sadly this happens. Unless your opinion fits the majority, it becomes an invalid opinion.
I am saddened by what happened, I too think it was a very risky move by all, especially Stockton Rush. I also can’t help but think that despite his sheer disrespect for rules and regulations, he must have still had some sort of faith in his design by going down there himself. Surely, in his mind, they were fine.
Exactly this. He may well have been a brilliant mind, a gifted engineer, a fearless adventurer but he had no checks and balances. And he fired the person who tried to raise concerns because he wouldn’t accept his assurances. Well we know now who was right and who was wrong on that point.I really think he did. He was obviously very wrong but this is literally why we have such tight regulation of almost all industries. You can't rely on people getting things right (even if they really tried). I hope a tighter regulatory regime comes from this situation.
Nothing good ever comes from an echo chamber. He does come across as arrogant but I dunno I see passion rather than unadulterated greed. Plus he went down in the thing so he can't have believed it would blow.Exactly this. He may well have been a brilliant mind, a gifted engineer, a fearless adventurer but he had no checks and balances. And he fired the person who tried to raise concerns because he wouldn’t accept his assurances. Well we know now who was right and who was wrong on that point.
He was passionate but also selfish.Nothing good ever comes from an echo chamber. He does come across as arrogant but I dunno I see passion rather than unadulterated greed. Plus he went down in the thing so he can't have believed it would blow.
It's sad all round.
Same. it's disgusting how many people see the word billionaire then lose any sympathy they may have had. They were still people like you and I. We all work hard and save, invest etc. I'm sure if any of us were ever fortunate enough to have a billion in the bank, we wouldn't automatically be unworthy of sympathy. Not every rich person is an asshole, the same way not every poor person is an angelI'm really shocked and disappointed by the lack of empathy a lot of people have for the five people who died. I don't care how much money someone has, it's still incredibly sad.
Yes I agree with that.He was passionate but also selfish.
We're all human, and on that level, I can feel grief for anyone who dies.Same. it's disgusting how many people see the word billionaire then lose any sympathy they may have had. They were still people like you and I. We all work hard and save, invest etc. I'm sure if any of us were ever fortunate enough to have a billion in the bank, we wouldn't automatically be unworthy of sympathy. Not every rich person is an asshole, the same way not every poor person is an angel
Same. I don’t like that there’s billionaires when people are starving but I don’t want to see people die in a horrible scary way because that’s just awfulI'm really shocked and disappointed by the lack of empathy a lot of people have for the five people who died. I don't care how much money someone has, it's still incredibly sad.
If I were that mother I wouldn’t want anyone to go through losing a child so unnecessarily as she has, so I’m sorry but I disagree with you. It made me and perhaps others have a talk with my family saying they should never do something to please others even if it’s a loved one and likewise I hope parents learn from it not to push their children into doing something they have genuine concerns about. You don‘t have to be a billionaire to risk life there other things that can put lives at risk and I think it’s an important conversation to have.