Netflix's woes are not down to H&M. It's down to a decline in content and the fact got thoroughly sick of bingewatching during the various lockdowns.
I don’t think what Meghan and Harry did was that great but I think people are waaay too emotional over it. Pure gutter scum? I would say there are people who are worse and have done worse who deserve that title. It’s like when people keep calling Meghan a bleep. Yes she hasn’t behaved in a great way but calling her names and the such is just a bit pathetic.
I didn’t accuse you of being part of the “Sussex Squad” I said that the narrative of PW silencing his mother was one being pushed by Sussex stans.
Why was this such a big story?
The story of William came from an instagram gossip page, if any news source commented on it they’d be at risk of being sued for libel. Something being trending doesn’t make it a newsworthy event, especially if it was started by a gossip pageIf anyone doubts the invisible contract between the British press and the royals, consider this - #princeofpegging was the #1 trending topic in the UK on Twitter yesterday, and in the top 10 in the US, Australia and several other countries but there is NO mention, not even a hint as far as I saw, on the Daily Mail.
Yet, when Meghan's OBGYN closed her practice - a private citizen doing a totally normal, personal thing - there was a full-blown article complete with pictures of the poor woman and a thousand DM banshees wailing and moaning and gnashing their teeth about her decision.
But no no, they're all treated the same by the media, you know...
Oh ffs, they need a hobby!
That's the thing. This stuff is a hobby for some.
It’s like teenage girls fighting over their favourite boy band member. One side hates the other side and they’re all as bad as each other. Most are harmless but away with the fairies but some are absolutely disgusting.
Tell that to the Dialy Mail … it’s half their ‘sources’ on everything
It’s like the people who believe Benedict Cumberbatch’s wife blackmailed him into marriage and runs the world from an underground bunker and has robobabies/uses the children of staff … or the people who wanted to tip up the pram of the offspring of the exOne Directioner to prove it was a robobaby (it seems there’s a theme running though … I’m assuming there is a online manual?)
Christ on a bike, how did I manage to avoid all of that?
Don’t get me wrong, I love a bit of gossip but some people lose all sense of reality. I’ve never been into elaborate conspiracy theories as the simplest explanation is usually the most likely.I'm here for the fun, a bit of distraction. But really when it comes to gossip, unless the subject of the gossip confirms something or someone confirms they were in the same room when such and such happened, well it's just, eh, tattle.Christ on a bike, how did I manage to avoid all of that?
There was a thread on Digital Spy Showbiz section before the curtain came down called something like Larries and other Tin Hats … it should still be there if searched for. It was always good for a laugh.Christ on a bike, how did I manage to avoid all of that?
Agree. That is the case with do many celebs. Who has he time to round hours researching fondpiracy theories or the brain space to be so up in arms over someone badmouthing their own family? It's not a personal insult if someone criticises the Royals and doesn't like the way one member of their own family spoke about their unborn child.
Is this a thing? They can change their name?
Yep, Queen's father was Albert, but went by George as king for example.
Yes. British monarchs can change their name upon succession. It's called their regnal name. Queen Victoria was actually christened Alexadrina but preferred her middle name Victoria.
Why? I mean, they could have claimed he prefers reverse Cowgirl? It’s so random. Why could this be true? Or what’s given you any indication this could have more merit to it than the seventh twin girl pregnancy surprise for Kate? Of course it could be true, but why would this claim be any less possible than any other claim about his preferences? If we believe someone in the know would talk and it goes to such an outlet, we should believe any claim.
