Wonder if the book will include this photo of the happy couple with their first baby?I imagine the book will be a lot of pictures from over the years and stories they’ve already talked about. Doubt there’s any revelations in there, more of a glossy biography of what made them want so many kids (spoiler: they were adopted) and how they managed financially (carefully leaving out the huge amount of financial help from the benefits system). This has been timed to come out just before Mother’s Day, so it’s gonna be a sickly sweet recount of the last 10 years of programmes that they’ve been airing.
Noel gives me creepy Fred West kind of vibes in that photo.Wonder if the book will include this photo of the happy couple with their first baby?
(She looks like she's first time babysitting and Noel look their parents dragged him into a family photo with his siblings on his way out the door to meet his mates at the pub)
View attachment 2712674
He wasnt only just a noncey he literally looked like one. How was this man not beaten or charged?Wonder if the book will include this photo of the happy couple with their first baby?
(She looks like she's first time babysitting and Noel look their parents dragged him into a family photo with his siblings on his way out the door to meet his mates at the pub)
View attachment 2712674
He’s definitely creepy.Noel gives me creepy Fred West kind of vibes in that photo.
And Chris is not a newborn here. He looks around a year old so around two years since he was conceived.Wonder if the book will include this photo of the happy couple with their first baby?
(She looks like she's first time babysitting and Noel look their parents dragged him into a family photo with his siblings on his way out the door to meet his mates at the pub)
View attachment 2712674
It’s really quite frightening, how young she must’ve actually looked when he started sleeping with herAnd Chris is not a newborn here. He looks around a year old so around two years since he was conceived.
Why is noel pulling that face!!Wonder if the book will include this photo of the happy couple with their first baby?
(She looks like she's first time babysitting and Noel look their parents dragged him into a family photo with his siblings on his way out the door to meet his mates at the pub)
View attachment 2712674
Might be wrong for saying this but she really looks like she has some sort of learning disability here.It’s really quite frightening, how young she must’ve actually looked when he started sleeping with her
But y’know they stayed together so
I’m not so sure if they are still pulling in decent viewing figures. I’ve started hate watching it!I reckon this will be the last series, that's why channel 5 don't care how bad it looks compared to their other shows.
There is nothing left to justify spending so much money on them could be put towards better things.
It's shocking how many people didn't know she was only 13 and he was nearly 18
Because they either avoided mentioning it or lied, didn't sue tell everyone she was 16??
With every news story posted more and more are finding out and it's not going in their favour
Brush up on the pie making you'll need it before long.
The things people will believe!Sue and Noel didn't need to right a book - their fans have already written their lives into a "love conquers all" fairytale and are adamant that THEIR version of events are 100% fact - despite it being completely fabricated. the amount of people who have convinced themselves that Sue and Noel were raised in care and met in foster homes, and that Noel truly believed Sue was far older than she was, and that they fell in love as a result of their similarly tough childhoods in and out of foster homes, thus stayed together, worked hard and raised their family together surrounded by love. blah blah blah. perhaps the Radfords should have hired one of their adoring fans to ghost wrote their book and twist a tale of grooming and statutory rape into the stuff of fairytales - it's like the plot of a Disney movie ffs!
View attachment 2713086
View attachment 2713085
Sue’s first baby Chris was born on May 7 1989. Sue was 14 at the time. However, Sue would have celebrated her 14th birthday when she was pregnant. This means that she was aged just 13 when she fell pregnant with Chris in the late summer of 1988.
Noel, meanwhile, is currently 53 years old. He was born on December 24 1970. When Chris was conceived, he would’ve been a few months shy of his 18th birthday. At the time, and currently, the age of consent in the UK is 16. Sue was below the age of consent, while Noel was above it. And it’s this – brought on by Noel’s comments about the age he was when he moved out of his family home – that have sparked backlash on social media.
Sue and Noel were both adopted as babies and met when Sue was aged just seven while they were at school. They started dating when they were teenagers.
But if Sue was 7 and Noel was 12 then they wouldn’t have been in the same school! As Noel would have been secondary school and Sue primary schoolLatest 22 Kids and Counting episode triggers viewers as they're reminded Noel Radford got Sue pregnant when she was 13
Sue and Noel Radford have come under fire after the last episode of 22 Kids and Counting after her age when she first got pregnant resurfaceswww.entertainmentdaily.com
According to this write up Sue was seven when they first met at school, so how long was Noelgroomingcourting her before she got pregnant? It's shameful that they were given a television show to normalize this.
I cannot get over how young she looks in this photo.Wonder if the book will include this photo of the happy couple with their first baby?
(She looks like she's first time babysitting and Noel look their parents dragged him into a family photo with his siblings on his way out the door to meet his mates at the pub)
View attachment 2712674
I think this is how Noel has gotten away with not having charges for statutory rape…. I think they’ve both been lying about their ages since the minute they got together. Pair this with Sue’s rapist enabler parents also being willing to lie for them. Obviously the 80s weren’t that long ago and I hate that excuse but the way we now share safeguarding information between services didn’t exist back then. It was easier for things to slip through the cracks and It would have been easier to lie. Complete speculation obviously but I’d bet money that when she was pregnant and underage they’d of said it was a lad from school the same age as her.I reckon this will be the last series, that's why channel 5 don't care how bad it looks compared to their other shows.
There is nothing left to justify spending so much money on them could be put towards better things.
It's shocking how many people didn't know she was only 13 and he was nearly 18
Because they either avoided mentioning
it or lied, didn't sue tell everyone she was 16??
With every news story posted more and more are finding out and it's not going in their favour
Brush up on the pie making you'll need it before long.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?