She announced it on that 20 kids and counting when she was pregnant with number 21. She first got pregnant at 12 when Noel was 17/18New to this lot and have a few questions about her being preggo at 13.
- Was this established when they first hit the headlines or is it an uncomfortable little detail that emerged over the years?
-Have they ever addressed this directly?
- Has the media ever brought it up?
I find it shocking that they are still touted in the media as being an aspirational family when she was just 13 when she fell pregnant to an older man.
Jesus!! She was actually 12She announced it on that 20 kids and counting when she was pregnant with number 21. She first got pregnant at 12 when Noel was 17/18
View attachment 81838
God knows, obviously they were local to each other but what 17/18 year old gives a 12 year old child a second glance?! Only one that is not right!!!Jesus!! She was actually 12. Have they ever said how they met?
True. I was at school in the 80s and a few girls got pregnant. One girl was 13 and it was never really addressed despite it being a catholic school too. The father was 16 and she went on to have the baby and come back to school while her mother took over the care of her son.God knows, obviously they were local to each other but what 17/18 year old gives a 12 year old child a second glance?! Only one that is not right!!!
When I was at school a somewhat promiscuous 14 year old girl got pregnant by this local scrote who had to have been at least 32 and already had multiple children with multiple mothers. Absolutely no one cared and he would appear daily at the school gates at lunch time etc to see her. It was in the time of Bebo/Myspace and I remember her/him publicly sharing almost naked photos of her which he had taken. Shocking this kind of stuff was allowed to happen but it did.
For years she said is was 14 and 16.She got pregnant at 13 and gave birth shortly after she turned 14. From what I can remember it was always out there, (although in 15KAC Sue said they were 16 and 18) but it wasn't until after the #metoo campaign that the media made a big deal about it.
Loads of girls got pregnant at my school too but it was generally with boys the same age or 1 or 2 years older. I remember telling my mum about the above and she thought I'd made it up to make the school sound bad or something, I was just like why would I make that upTrue. I was at school in the 80s and a few girls got pregnant. One girl was 13 and it was never really addressed despite it being a catholic school too. The father was 16 and she went on to have the baby and come back to school while her mother took over the care of her son.
I've said before Sue was in Year 8 when she got pregnant and Noel was in 6th form..... That is not normal at all, in the slightest!Can I just address that alot of people especially their followers say it was normal for 13,14 and 15 year olds to get pregnant ect
It really wasnt and isnt ok. I am sorry but it was still a crime.
And I do think in Sues case she was and still is very very vulnerable.
You haven’t been following for long then. They don’t have PR they do everything themselves, that’s why everything looks so bad!! She has her own Facebook profile which I last spoke to her on the beginning of January.No sorry not accepting that there's someone, who's been in the public domain for years, who are that stupid to use their real name online to share private into.
They for sure have PR since they went big on TV years ago and no fucking chance would she have created a profile in her real name.
So I'm calling bullshit until proven otherwise. Bring the goods.
They met when Sue was 7 and they lived in neighbouring roads. Noel was friends with her brother according to a news articleJesus!! She was actually 12. Have they ever said how they met?
They probably do have some basic PR, I imagine that is why her blogs (where she declared they claimed tax creditsYou haven’t been following for long then. They don’t have PR they do everything themselves, that’s why everything looks so bad!! She has her own Facebook profile which I last spoke to her on the beginning of January.
I think that post is from a radford to throw everyone off. They know there is so much more.They probably do have some basic PR, I imagine that is why her blogs (where she declared they claimed tax credits) and spoke utter shit for pages with no punctuation, was taken down. But there’s no way Noel would let someone else take much of what they ‘earn’ so it will be basic.
As for saying Sue didn’t go online with profiles using her own name though, that’s the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Like anyone with a brain cell would pretend to be Sue Vagfordyou couldn’t if you tried.
According to the Law this is why there was no prosecution as Noel was not a teacher etc.Can I just address that alot of people especially their followers say it was normal for 13,14 and 15 year olds to get pregnant ect
It really wasnt and isnt ok. I am sorry but it was still a crime.
And I do think in Sues case she was and still is very very vulnerable.
That just means that the law is 16 for most, but it’s stricter at 18 if you’re in a position of trust. Not that you won’t be prosecuted if you’re not in a position of trust. It’s to cover vulnerable 16/17 year olds from people abusing their trust xAccording to the Law this is why there was no prosecution as Noel was not a teacher etc.
THE AGE OF CONSENT FOR SEX
ENGLAND AND WALES
The age of consent to any form of sexual activity is 16 for both men and women. The age of consent is the same regardless of the gender or sexual orientation of a person and whether the sexual activity is between people of the same or different gender.
It is an offence for anyone to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 16. However, Home Office guidance [1] is clear that there is no intention to prosecute teenagers under the age of 16 where both mutually agree and where they are of a similar age.
It is an offence for a person aged 18 or over to have any sexual activity with a person under the age of 18 if the older person holds a position of trust (for example a teacher or social worker) as such sexual activity is an abuse of the position of trust.
Yes but it's also why Noel wasn't prosecuted as basically the law is there but like for example two under 16 year olds having sex, if they're both in agreement then they won't be prosecuted. The fact Noel was having sex with her age 18 when she was 14 he would not be prosecuted but if he was in a position of trust at the time then he would have been.That just means that the law is 16 for most, but it’s stricter at 18 if you’re in a position of trust. Not that you won’t be prosecuted if you’re not in a position of trust. It’s to cover vulnerable 16/17 year olds from people abusing their trust x
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?