How do you know all this ?The new “gf” is from Scotland she’s a known prostitute. She is signed with the “agency” in london. She’s also got a new nose, new boobs and a face full of filler that she got for free for advertising it. They only started following each other two weeks agoso it’s definitely a business arrangement.
The Kardashians #9
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Kardashians Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
How far they’ve come… 
Glasgow is a pretty small place. She’s renowned in the area. Plus Logan Paul outed her on his YouTube video “she cheated on me with a billionaire”. It’s about her.
Long time lurker, now is my time to jump on! She went to my school, real mean girl bully. Rumour in perth has it she’s a high end escort, not sure if they are ‘together’ or if he’s paying her….
Another birthday party! True is 4.
Yep the usual, balloons and flowers everywhere. Not sure about the kittens, True did not seem interested. I hope they ain't a present.
Yep the usual, balloons and flowers everywhere. Not sure about the kittens, True did not seem interested. I hope they ain't a present.
I see their hair dresser Jen atkin has had another mail order surrogate baby. Hasn’t their son just turned one? If you’re having babies to order that seems an insane gap. Clearly they just want to get this baby part over with but didn’t want to have an only child.
Erghk I see Jen Atkins has had another ‘prop’ … I mean child 
I feel like Norisblackbook on Instagram has the North attitude down to a tee.
Can also confirm that there are constant rumours about Rebecca D being an escort. I have mutual friends so recognised her when she popped up in the Daily Mail with Scott Disick, purely because it's a random connection but looks like she may be there on "business". Didn't think Scott would have to pay for company though.
Can also confirm that there are constant rumours about Rebecca D being an escort. I have mutual friends so recognised her when she popped up in the Daily Mail with Scott Disick, purely because it's a random connection but looks like she may be there on "business". Didn't think Scott would have to pay for company though.
I think people are catching on though. Because they literally met last week and now she’s been taken everywhere he’s definitely not in love with her because he looks miserable every time they get spotted together so it’s clearly a job! That leggings “business” muse is just a cover up for all her prozzy earnings. The worst thing she could’ve done is be seen out with a someone as high profile as that because it’s common knowledge back here what and who she is and it’s giving people a chance to enlighten those that don’t 
he’s definitely not in love with her because he looks miserable every time they get spotted together so it’s clearly a job! That leggings “business” muse is just a cover up for all her prozzy earnings. The worst thing she could’ve done is be seen out with a someone as high profile as that because it’s common knowledge back here what and who she is and it’s giving people a chance to enlighten those that don’t Not surprised in the slightest. I've heard of a lot this going around. Basically most celeb males pay for women to be with for a particularly amount of time. Everytime you see a male celeb with a beautiful young woman, that just came out from nowhere, it's almost always that. There's agencies to match these 'models' (escorts) with celebs. Even these highly successful, good looking celebs get escorts.
(Edited typos)
Last edited:
It kinda makes sense for Scott disick to do this right now. He’s clearly in a terrible place mentally so if he pays for her that way he saves face by having a date to the premiere without having to do the graft required in a serious conquest. If that makes any sense
?
i saw a tiktok about kylie basically arriving to the premiere late & on her own to avoid pap pics. the pics she used for her promo were paid for. yet here she is in background of true’s party today looking bigger than she’s making out.
tbh i’m ngl i’m a kardashian stan and i get they have an image to live up to, but kylie could’ve definitely ran with the more relatable post baby struggles rather than catfishing everyone. besides, she literally looks fine and as expected with a newborn baby!
tbh i’m ngl i’m a kardashian stan
and i get they have an image to live up to, but kylie could’ve definitely ran with the more relatable post baby struggles rather than catfishing everyone. besides, she literally looks fine and as expected with a newborn baby!Attachments
Sorry but all those pics are edited
they aren’t perfect but those photos are tampered with 
kim got done so dirty here
Are they?Sorry but all those pics are edited
I remember the unedited pics posted here not long of Kourtney. And she looked the same as this (if anyone remembers).And I've seen Kim unedited with bad skin as well. But not this bad, so who knows. You could be right, but I also wouldn't be surprised if these are real.
Well seeing Scott isn’t there. He’s well and truly been cut out of the inner circle.i saw a tiktok about kylie basically arriving to the premiere late & on her own to avoid pap pics. the pics she used for her promo were paid for. yet here she is in background of true’s party today looking bigger than she’s making out.
tbh i’m ngl i’m a kardashian stan
I would say Kendall’s skin is actually perfect. As perfect as you’re going to get on a human being over the age of 12. Kim and Kourtneys skin just looks how I would expect a high res photo of a 40+ woman with lots of makeup on to look. I imagine in real life they look good even if heavily made up. The human eye assesses a face differently in real life to how we do on camera. The problem is the Kardashians, and 99% of social media users, perpetuate unobtainable beauty standards with filters and face tune. Skin is no longer allowed to look like skin anymore.
- Status