Does the lazy bitch just sit on Instagram thinking of things she wants and then pounces on them and follows to get them free? I didn't realise scrounging and begging are a job now.Who wants to risk being imprisoned by notifying this company of the Inghams before Sarah starts begging them for freebies....??
From about 13:30 A treat for you . The back of Chris Inghams bald head caught by another u tuber.
Absolute no I don't. I just don't feel the need too. I just go to website.Out of interest, do people here tend to follow companies on their Instagram accounts? I only follow 16 accounts on mine and they're all people, not companies. If I'm interested in a company's range, I just look on their website and usually you canitems in a Favourites lists, so I never understand the reason why I'd need to follow them on Insta. I get the horrible feeling with Lazy that she's following brands in a thirsty pursuit of collabs and gifts, but maybe everyone else follows companies too. Am I the odd one out?
They don’t have a pending harassment case. Telling companies the truth about Chris actions is not classed at harassment. I remember a judge slamming John terry for showing off prior to his house being robbed. If there was a pending case then surely you would not put yourself out there via you tube. Criticism is not illegal they are just tramps seeking freebies etc etc lol.I’d be careful with the shot gun reporting. They could just be following accounts hoping people email which will add to their harassment claims
She didnt say come on let's go tidy your room, I mean once again Sarah's kids coming across as angels katrinas then look messy etc, they probably just went into her room. I don't get why they couldn't of watched the videos with them.Isabelle cleaning her cousins room - did anyone else find that strange? Not wanting to say too much but I have a family member who did the same/ similar as a child/ teen and they had extreme anxiety. Taking control of cleaning/ tidying was apparently a coping mechanism. A few people here have mentioned her being highly anxious.
I meant them constantly claiming to other companies and on social media that they are being harassed.They don’t have a pending harassment case. Telling companies the truth about Chris actions is not classed at harassment. I remember a judge slamming John terry for showing off prior to his house being robbed. If there was a pending case then surely you would not put yourself out there via you tube. Criticism is not illegal they are just tramps seeking freebies etc etc lol.
I follow a few. But they're companies that I use fairly regularly. I like to keep updated on their latest stock.Out of interest, do people here tend to follow companies on their Instagram accounts? I only follow 16 accounts on mine and they're all people, not companies. If I'm interested in a company's range, I just look on their website and usually you canitems in a Favourites lists, so I never understand the reason why I'd need to follow them on Insta. I get the horrible feeling with Lazy that she's following brands in a thirsty pursuit of collabs and gifts, but maybe everyone else follows companies too. Am I the odd one out?
That's a good observation. I suffer with anxiety myself, and when it's really bad, I like to take control more - cleaning/tidying is one way I am able to.Isabelle cleaning her cousins room - did anyone else find that strange? Not wanting to say too much but I have a family member who did the same/ similar as a child/ teen and they had extreme anxiety. Taking control of cleaning/ tidying was apparently a coping mechanism. A few people here have mentioned her being highly anxious.
Pretty much, she's followed another kids clothing company just a couple of hours ago. Its blatantly obvious she would rather scrounge clothes for her kids from smaller insta businesses than put her hand in her own pocket...Does the lazy bitch just sit on Instagram thinking of things she wants and then pounces on them and follows to get them free? I didn't realise scrounging and begging are a job now.
I'm not sure that's something to be proud of. In fact I'd say that's exactly the type of behaviour we need to avoid.Guys!
Ive been spamming ‘twinkle teepees’ from 4 anonymous accounts and they have now removed all photos of isabelles party and all photos of inghamsLazy is gonna be pissed hahahahahaha
I can still see them all on there and on Facebook.Guys!
Ive been spamming ‘twinkle teepees’ from 4 anonymous accounts and they have now removed all photos of isabelles party and all photos of inghamsLazy is gonna be pissed hahahahahaha
I can still see in on insta? Don’t see the point in spamming them. They were well aware of who they were working with as lazy stated she had pre warned them and it was all for publicity. In the grand scheme of things what’s little teepee company. It is them who end up looking silly for working with them so more fool them and the business. It’s not like they would get lots and lot of orders I would assume.Guys!
Ive been spamming ‘twinkle teepees’ from 4 anonymous accounts and they have now removed all photos of isabelles party and all photos of inghamsLazy is gonna be pissed hahahahahaha
The pics are still on their Instagram...Guys!
Ive been spamming ‘twinkle teepees’ from 4 anonymous accounts and they have now removed all photos of isabelles party and all photos of inghamsLazy is gonna be pissed hahahahahaha
Thank you for that explanation. That's very interestingWhat a shame the -5.1k wasn't due to deletions. They have clearly been boosting their sub count.
For those wondering why vloggers buy subs and views, companies looking to work with them will check their numbers via site like Social Blade. they also check engagement figures (likes/dislikes and comments on videos). If figures show a healthy influx of new subscribers and high views then that is often enough to encourage a company to want to collaborate with a vlogger. Buying subs and views helps the vlogger to look popular and, moe importantly, as if their channel is growing rather than stagnant.
Re: ad revenue, you don't usually get that for fake views because they don't 'view' long enough for the payment to kick in. I think it's usually around 30 seconds of viewing needed to 'count' and trigger ad revenue. Having said that, there are varying types of subs and views that can be bought - basically, the more you pay, the better the engagement you get. From what I've read, the cheap packages tend to buy you bots that don't engage in the same way as a human therefore no ad revenue. The more expensive packages get you a 'better class of fake' that watch enough of the vlog for ad revenue to kick in and also post comments to increase engagement stats.
TLDR
Cheap bought views/subs = no ad revenue but superficial boost to stats
More expensive ones = potential revenue and engagement plus boost to stats
I agree, this is forcefully putting your opinion on someone else, to the point of harassment.I'm not sure that's something to be proud of. In fact I'd say that's exactly the type of behaviour we need to avoid.
It's okay to express disappointment in a company/brand for working with the Inghams or ensuring they are aware of the various controversies but this is a step too far imo
Oh, and no they haven't removed the pics.
View attachment 42121
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?