Hlow to draw a boss babyWhat was the video?
How to draw a boss babyWhat was the video?
Hlow to draw a boss babyWhat was the video?
How to draw a boss babyWhat was the video?
Esme wouldn’t have found it herself because as a good parent Sarah monitors her children’s internet usage I thought she said? So which is itHlow to draw a boss baby
How to draw a boss baby
What’s the girls show got to do with it. I thought the vlogs were edited and ready overnight.From their YouTube
Hmm, I'm trying to figure out whether that would be copyright. As technically it's just a step-by-step drawing video and not someone's individual unique artwork that they've simply put on display for others to look at and not copy. The main purpose of that video is to copy her drawing.Hlow to draw a boss baby
How to draw a boss baby
Thats what i thought. You upload them early then pick a time for them to go live? Isnt that how it works.What’s the girls show got to do with it. I thought the vlogs were edited and ready overnight.
Lie after lie.
All depends on what Chris constitutes as “editing”....might be editing a dropped towel somewhere...Thats what i thought. You upload them early then pick a time for them to go live? Isnt that how it works.
I think the difference is that they’re using it for monetary gain.Hmm, I'm trying to figure out whether that would be copyright. As technically it's just a step-by-step drawing video and not someone's individual unique artwork that they've simply put on display for others to look at and not copy. The main purpose of that video is to copy her drawing.
Not defending them, I don't support anything of what they do, but I can't help but to state that.
But to get it printed on vests as your own design? I wouldn't be happy if I made that video and then seen it in shops with designed by Esme InghamHmm, I'm trying to figure out whether that would be copyright. As technically it's just a step-by-step drawing video and not someone's individual unique artwork that they've simply put on display for others to look at and not copy. The main purpose of that video is to copy her drawing.
Not defending them, I don't support anything of what they do, but I can't help but to state that.
Yes you basically schedule it. So when he finished it at 4am he would schedule it to go live at 5pm that day. All seems dubious. That they are late lately all the time but he’s supposed finished them early hours of the morning is just dubiousThats what i thought. You upload them early then pick a time for them to go live? Isnt that how it works.
Had a google and you can copy artwork, that's legal, even if it is covered by copyright. But you cannot make a profit from it unless you are the copyright holder. So, if the artist has it copyrighted, the Ingham's cannot sell it for monetary gain as it has been copied.Hmm, I'm trying to figure out whether that would be copyright. As technically it's just a step-by-step drawing video and not someone's individual unique artwork that they've simply put on display for others to look at and not copy. The main purpose of that video is to copy her drawing.
I hope;nmm'lju“Lovingly handmade in our nursery” my ass.
They are so damn shifty it’s no wonder they are happy to work with the Minghams.
It was Sarah's pronunciation of 'velour' which sickened me the most.You can tell from my enthusiastic highlighting the part I’m most offended by
View attachment 29212
Velour
it’s just so “juicy couture” circa 2000
Slap some writing on his ass and he’s just like mommy.
Matching mammaIt was Sarah's pronunciation of 'velour' which sickened me the most.
It's because they need to be available to delete hate comments, etc etcWhat’s the girls show got to do with it. I thought the vlogs were edited and ready overnight.
Lie after lie.
Yestedays vlog were they were picking up the doll Jace and they had a copied drawing on his shirt that esme drewWhat was the video?