There was no need for her to be in the thumbnail for the recent vlog or the doing something crazy in the rain vlog. Any reason to show her in her swimwear though.Just had a look and Isabelle has been in the thumbnail for the last 5 vlogs in a row.
Chris knows exactly what he's doing. I bet she brings in the most views, and all the wrong kind.Just had a look and Isabelle has been in the thumbnail for the last 5 vlogs in a row.
Edit: not all. It's still on the destination reveal one. Not very good advertisement for the hotel though... Shouldn't they be plugging that discount code at every chance they get on the vlog etc, and declaring it properly as an ad.Just noticed - they've taken their 5% discount code off all their holiday vlog descriptions.
The person at the top also liked these tweets from somebody who defended Chris. Probably the same person trolling, wouldn’t surprise me.Wow .. now we’re heading into unchartered waters. I’d be damn certain I could prove that without a doubt before tweeting it
View attachment 19762
Is there insta still private?First of all, apologies that I don't know how to do screenshots.
There's an insta story on nothingbutsassyinghams that starts with For all the hate of me "filming through a fence"
Also if you look at the questions, someone has asked for an opinion about Chris. Makes for interesting reading.
My ex (aka iron filing spray-on hair) used to do the same during passionate moments. I'd grab his hair, he'd rush to brush it forwards again. Kind of killed the moment.
Apologies for TMI
I think so. Before they made their Insta private they said 'see you tomorrow' or something similar in a post.
On the plus side, it's nice to see the children having someone to have fun with. Makes a change from hanging around with their parents.
Wow .. now we’re heading into unchartered waters. I’d be damn certain I could prove that without a doubt before tweeting it
View attachment 19762
Can’t see this the profile is private, you have more info?First of all, apologies that I don't know how to do screenshots.
There's an insta story on nothingbutsassyinghams that starts with For all the hate of me "filming through a fence"
Also if you look at the questions, someone has asked for an opinion about Chris. Makes for interesting reading.
Sexual offence against children have no statutory limitation in the US. See 18 USC 3283. But Creepy, if you’re reading this, I’d say chance it - I’m sure you’ll be fine! Besides, guys like you find it really easy to make friends in American jails.Just want your opinion on this Ellerious. My understanding is that most countries including the US have a statute of limitations on bringing of charges of about 12 months (by this I mean from when police were contacted they generally have 12 months for minor charges, as in grooming, to bring about a criminal charge) otherwise he can never be charged with this crime and it can’t interfere with his visa application for the US (unless anyone else brings a new charge against him) so I’m guessing he is waiting for the anniversary before returning to Florida essentially a free man with a clean record. He would not have to be worried about going through immigration then. also would people then contacting hotels or immigration be liable for harassment once those 12 months have passed?
No, no and thrice no. This is not right.I thought Florida criminal statute for sexual misdemeanours was until the victim turned 18 however the good news is the clock is effectively stopped on that statute time whilst he’s not in the state.
Effectively he’s back to day 1 without statute protection the second he sets foot in Florida. He has to have spent a continuous 12 months in Florida, without leaving before statute limitations may be considered.
Harassment is more of a misdemeanour however the penalties would apply to the country he was in. There’s no civil statute on that as far as I know. Contacting hotels and other places isn’t harrassment in itself, if it’s deemed a public interest matter.
I’m not sure then, from what I saw in the Florida legislation that clause you refer to is the Supreme Court and citing felony aggravated child abuse or kidnapping which he hasn’t been charged with.Sexual offence against children have no statutory limitation in the US. See 18 USC 3283. But Creepy, if you’re reading this, I’d say chance it - I’m sure you’ll be fine! Besides, guys like you find it really easy to make friends in American jails.
No, no and thrice no. This is not right.
You can use a snipping tool if you are on a laptop, it should be listed in your programmes button, bottom left of the screen. There should also be a 'prt sc' (print screen) button top right of the keyboard.First of all, apologies that I don't know how to do screenshots.
just filming down the street it will be difficult to get permission from those who may just pop in and out of view, as he said.Maybe they do ask permission to film, but I highly doubt they also tell these people that the footage is going to be uploaded onto YouTube for anyone to watch.
Exactly. They are a business. So in theory are a film crew. And let’s be honest Chris doesn’t just walk round with his iPhone he’s got a right bit of big kit he uses. You wouldn’t see bbc rocking up and just being able to film poolside. And the Inghams reach (sadly) is hundreds of thousands.just filming down the street it will be difficult to get permission from those who may just pop in and out of view, as he said.
However, when they are sitting around a pool with others clearly in view for amounts of time, they should be asking those to sign a release form allowing their permission to be on camera.
I really think that this is a big problem with a lot of vloggers. They register themselves as limited companies. They are a business, yet they still think they’re Joe Vlogs down the street just sharing bits on social media.Exactly. They are a business. So in theory are a film crew. And let’s be honest Chris doesn’t just walk round with his iPhone he’s got a right bit of big kit he uses. You wouldn’t see bbc rocking up and just being able to film poolside. And the Inghams reach (sadly) is hundreds of thousands.
They aren’t just some family making holiday videos, they are profiting from them. So if they are going to run a business they should treat it as such.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?