I cannot even imagine how many glasses of “leg opener” cocktail is required to be just semi conscious enough to make it through special cuddles with him just to conceive the boy child.
I cannot even imagine how many glasses of “leg opener” cocktail is required to be just semi conscious enough to make it through special cuddles with him just to conceive the boy child.My ex (aka iron filing spray-on hair) used to do the same during passionate moments. I'd grab his hair, he'd rush to brush it forwards again. Kind of killed the moment.
Apologies for TMI
<cough> turkey baster <cough>I cannot even imagine how many glasses of “leg opener” cocktail is required to be just semi conscious enough to make it through special cuddles with him just to conceive the boy child.
I reckon he’d be the sort to scream out woohooooooooo and the whole thing would take less than 30 seconds including foreplay<cough> turkey baster <cough>
Just want your opinion on this Ellerious. My understanding is that most countries including the US have a statute of limitations on bringing of charges of about 12 months (by this I mean from when police were contacted they generally have 12 months for minor charges, as in grooming, to bring about a criminal charge) otherwise he can never be charged with this crime and it can’t interfere with his visa application for the US (unless anyone else brings a new charge against him) so I’m guessing he is waiting for the anniversary before returning to Florida essentially a free man with a clean record. He would not have to be worried about going through immigration then. also would people then contacting hotels or immigration be liable for harassment once those 12 months have passed?I know what you mean and I don’t have British law experience just crown stuff however what I was trying to say and not very well is that in any court in any country all his dirty laundry would come out, I’m thinking in terms of being awarded damages for commercial revenues lost not harassment, defamation etc only this specific contract as a free room for publicity arrangement. The contract would be with his trading company not him personally.
What I believe it comes down to is that if he is kicked out of the hotel because of media being made aware etc he might still have grounds to pursue damages against the hotel for breach on contract of a malicious nature.
The hotel should have done their due diligence on him so if they didn’t terminate his contract prior and they do now, it’s possible that he could be awarded damages against the hotel for loss of earnings if he pursued it, because a reasonable person could have easily discovered the allegations by a google search at least and it could be determined that the hotel should have known.
Make as much noise to the hotel etc
I don’t want to see him profit in any way is all and the action I’m thinking of is all about loss of earnings and the court wouldn’t necessarily see him being an alleged groomer as grounds for a contract dispute.
I hope that makes more sense
Oh my days I’ve just watched it, those eyebrows on top of those sunglasses just look ridiculousLazy doesn`t give a dam ,so long as they`ve content for their lame vlogs! Also ,whilst we`re talking about filming ,i`m surprised lazy didn`t grab herself a larger pair of sunspecs!Those eyebrows!!
Just looks about 50 and acts about 15!
besides by now her behind will be well and truly stuck to that sun lounger!
Do you work for Levi’s?Just want your opinion on this Ellerious. My understanding is that most countries including the US have a statute of limitations on bringing of charges of about 12 months (by this I mean from when police were contacted they generally have 12 months for minor charges, as in grooming, to bring about a criminal charge) otherwise he can never be charged with this crime and it can’t interfere with his visa application for the US (unless anyone else brings a new charge against him) so I’m guessing he is waiting for the anniversary before returning to Florida essentially a free man with a clean record. He would not have to be worried about going through immigration then. also would people then contacting hotels or immigration be liable for harassment once those 12 months have passed?
Just want your opinion on this Ellerious. My understanding is that most countries including the US have a statute of limitations on bringing of charges of about 12 months (by this I mean from when police were contacted they generally have 12 months for minor charges, as in grooming, to bring about a criminal charge) otherwise he can never be charged with this crime and it can’t interfere with his visa application for the US (unless anyone else brings a new charge against him) so I’m guessing he is waiting for the anniversary before returning to Florida essentially a free man with a clean record. He would not have to be worried about going through immigration then. also would people then contacting hotels or immigration be liable for harassment once those 12 months have passed?
Your ex AKA Spray on iron filings head needs his own thread, I’m loving the updates!My ex (aka iron filing spray-on hair) used to do the same during passionate moments. I'd grab his hair, he'd rush to brush it forwards again. Kind of killed the moment.
Apologies for TMI
I think so. Before they made their Insta private they said 'see you tomorrow' or something similar in a post.
On the plus side, it's nice to see the children having someone to have fun with. Makes a change from hanging around with their parents.
I thought Florida criminal statute for sexual misdemeanours was until the victim turned 18 however the good news is the clock is effectively stopped on that statute time whilst he’s not in the state.Just want your opinion on this Ellerious. My understanding is that most countries including the US have a statute of limitations on bringing of charges of about 12 months (by this I mean from when police were contacted they generally have 12 months for minor charges, as in grooming, to bring about a criminal charge) otherwise he can never be charged with this crime and it can’t interfere with his visa application for the US (unless anyone else brings a new charge against him) so I’m guessing he is waiting for the anniversary before returning to Florida essentially a free man with a clean record. He would not have to be worried about going through immigration then. also would people then contacting hotels or immigration be liable for harassment once those 12 months have passed?
A well positioned parasol would block out other people at the pool when filming Sarah.And those poor unsuspecting holiday makers behind her letting it all hang out, as others have said that’s not fair could she not just have sat at a different angle to protect their privacy?!
Is the Harassment you stated here just for Florida or is reporting in Europe considered harassment do you know??I thought Florida criminal statute for sexual misdemeanours was until the victim turned 18 however the good news is the clock is effectively stopped on that statute time whilst he’s not in the state.
Effectively he’s back to day 1 without statute protection the second he sets foot in Florida.
Harassment is more of a misdemeanour however the penalties would apply to the country he was in. There’s no civil statute on that as far as I know. Contacting hotels and other places isn’t harrassment in itself, if it’s deemed a public interest matter.
That bald bitch is an ex for a reason. Don't even get me started on him - he doesn't need a thread, he needs a dedicated forum for his various transgressions.Your ex AKA Spray on iron filings head needs his own thread, I’m loving the updates!
I can actually smell it and imagine the sticky stains it’d leave on your hands. Creepy deffo uses something like this is put my house on it xThat bald bitch is an ex for a reason. Don't even get me started on him - he doesn't need a thread, he needs a dedicated forum for his various transgressions.
https://giphy.com/4jt3RFwB2db9e
Harassment is one of those in the eye of the beholder type arrangements but making truthful statements as a matter of public interest respectfully and as appropriate isn’t deemed deliberately harassing or malicious. I’m assuming the same applies throughout most parts of Europe. He’d have to prove any malicious intent or reward firsthe could still go but mud sticks and he would be constantly looking over his shoulder, as FFTMC says we have had prosecutions going back years , I personally think if he does it once he will do it again except next time I hope the girl reports it in the USA (Im really hoping im wrong about a next time but its Chris Ingham we are talking about),
Is the Harassment you stated here just for Florida or is reporting in Europe considered harassment do you know??
Thanks for clarifying Ellerious- I’m not a lawyer. I had assumed that’s why they were told not to admit anything and wait out the limitation period. I am pleased that Chris will still be very concerned and worried about arriving at the US immigration the next time he goes to Florida. And as for the harassment - I just don’t want them to profit off (at our expense or from naive companies giving them freebies and then getting a backlash ) of Chris’ grossly inappropriate dealings with vulnerable teens.I thought Florida criminal statute for sexual misdemeanours was until the victim turned 18 however the good news is the clock is effectively stopped on that statute time whilst he’s not in the state.
Effectively he’s back to day 1 without statute protection the second he sets foot in Florida. He has to have spent a continuous 12 months in Florida, without leaving before statute limitations may be considered.
Harassment is more of a misdemeanour however the penalties would apply to the country he was in. There’s no civil statute on that as far as I know. Contacting hotels and other places isn’t harrassment in itself, if it’s deemed a public interest matter.
He’s on someone’s radar .. he’s going to struggle with immigration particularly in the Commonwealth & Asian countries such as Thailand. He doesn’t seem to realise he’s possibly potentially flagged as a predator and was possiblydenied initial entry in to Oz as he may have been held to see if he planned to use it as a base to fly in and out of Asian countries on child sex junketsThanks for clarifying Ellerious- I’m not a lawyer. I had assumed that’s why they were told not to admit anything and wait out the limitation period. I am pleased that Chris will still be very concerned and worried about arriving at the US immigration the next time he goes to Florida. And as for the harassment - I just don’t want them to profit off (at our expense or from naive companies giving them freebies and then getting a backlash ) of Chris’ grossly inappropriate dealings with vulnerable teens.
I also think he will not be able to help himself and that it will happen again.
Surely with all the people they have in the background, a few must have objected...so do they blur those people? I don’t watch the vlogs regularly so don’t know how often they do blur people out. You can’t just cut scenes with those who don’t want to be filmed if they are vital to the Inghams ‘plot’...or do the just film those scenes again? HmmhSo they ask permission of anyone they film for a bit? Someone on here was sat in the same restaurant as them once - I can't remember who it was though. If it was you, can you please inform us whether or not everyone got asked if it was OK for them to film?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?