I did send them an Invoice for our services last September, but typical Inghams 8 months later and they’ve still not paid up. So that’s us waiting in the queue with the Tax man I suppose.
I did send them an Invoice for our services last September, but typical Inghams 8 months later and they’ve still not paid up. So that’s us waiting in the queue with the Tax man I suppose.In addition should we send a collective invoice to them as writers of the tv show or individual invoices?
Slap on a late payment fee or threaten them with Levi'sI did send them an Invoice for our services last September, but typical Inghams 8 months later and they’ve still not paid up. So that’s us waiting in the queue with the Tax man I suppose.
View attachment 19611
Maybe you should’ve sent it to their PR granny ZeldaI did send them an Invoice for our services last September, but typical Inghams 8 months later and they’ve still not paid up. So that’s us waiting in the queue with the Tax man I suppose.
View attachment 19611
Working towards rectifying it?! Just tell them to stop simple as!!So I've just contacted the hotel regarding them still filming guests in the background and have been told that they are aware and are working towards rectifying it
It’s so risky If someone is in witness protection or moved from a violent homeI'm about to message this resort again telling them they need to take down the vlog with all the children and adults they filmed. They need permission and they are violating the law maybe then something will happen
Spain
In Spain, the right to the own image is guaranteed by Constitution (Sections 18.1 and 20.4).[109]
- Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Requires consent (see definition below)
- Publishing pictures of a person in a public space: Requires consent (as per above)
- Commercial use of a published picture of a person in a public space: Requires consent (as per above)
Civil law deals with this subject in the context of privacy legislation (Fundamental Law No. 1/1982).[110]According to section 7.5 of the above law[111], “the taking, reproducing or publishing of the image of a person captured by photography or filming or any other means in places or moments of private life or outside these” is considered to be an “illegal intromission in private life”, unless in some specific cases. The same applies under section 7.6 of the mentioned law to the illegitimate “use of the name, the voice or the image of a person for publicity, commercial or similar purposes.”The exceptions to the above statement are the following:
Later commercial re-use of previously published news pictures or public figures' images (lawfully released without permission) is not allowed without the consent of the person(s) affected (see Sentence 231/88 of the Spanish Constitutional Court, dealing with the death of the star matador Paquirri).[115]Special rules apply to minors and incapacitated persons. If they are under a legal disability, written consent from a legal representative is to be obtained in order to capture or publish or use their picture, and shall be submitted to the local Public Prosecutor's Office for approvement (section 3 of the above law).
- There is no illegal intromission:
- In case of explicit consent of the concerned person (section 2.2).[112]
- In case of predominant and relevant historical, scientific or cultural interests (section 8.1).
- It is allowed to capture, reproduce and publish a picture without permission if the person depicted is a public figure[113] and the picture is taken in a public event or in a public space, open to everybody (section 8.2.a).[114]
- It is allowed to propagate graphical information about public events or occurrences when the image of a particular person appears merely incidentally (section 8.2.c).
Other regulations: Section 491.2 of the Spanish Penal Code penalizes the use of the image of the King or any of his ancestors or descendents, the Prince or Princess Consort, the Crown Prince, the Regent or any Member of the Regency in any way that can damage the prestige of the Crown.
Could contact the Spanish police too if they have broken the law.I am also going to contact the hotel. Filming people without their consent in Spain is against the law.
Sarah Ingham wouldn’t lie!Wierd hasn't Sarah stated before that Chris always wears a t shirt when in the water for modesty reason or some shit like that.
When Isla was 4, they bought a buggy for her to go in at DLP, despite the fact you can hire kiddy pushchairs that are for older kids that get tired (big plastic ones).They’re down the beach today anyway with
if it wasn’t them using it however then you would have thought they would have returned it back to reception so some other family that can use it could use it.. but no there has been no signs of them having their own stroller so assuming that they are using that one. Which I don’t know why you would risk it? Like yes it’s great the hotel provide them but if they weren’t to know that, where is their stroller? Why with all the travelling etc they do would they not think to buy a travel stroller, you can get them for £100-150 realistically. There is no head support for the baby whether it can decline fully or not.
I can’t see any of the hair product or mini Sarah rant comments on the IG pic sadlySomeone on Chris' insta told him to wash his hair, he's replied saying he does everyday and it's 'product'. Cue numerous people telling him he used the wrong 'your' and saying he must use a lot of 'product' and Sarah replying 'You need to wash your mouth out!'. Wow. What a lovely holiday they must be having
That pic is pukeworthy though. He looks like a twelve year old boy who's just got facebook for the first time, slaps the first filter he finds on it, and trying to be 'ard by posing with those hand signs. All he needs now is a can of Monster and a spliff hanging out his mouth. Oh wait.. those are Sarah's brothers, the jobless scrounger and the recently released paedophile.
Foolish dipstickHas the thick shit actually paid £25 for a FAKE Adidas cap?? I’m sure you can get a real Adidas cap for less than that?!??
They’ve seen him coming from a mile away
And what utter tripe from him about caring for the workers and all that. People want to relax on the beach not have people approach them every 60 seconds. I’m much more inclined to spend money when I don’t feel harassed into it. That post is all about his ego, bit like when they film themselves giving food to homeless people
He didn’t mind paying ‘slightly more than it was worth’ you paid about 24 euros more than it was worth hahaha
What was the showing bit about ? I dont have their insta ?I can’t see any of the hair product or mini Sarah rant comments on the IG pic sadlyI was excited I do like a Sarah rant, ‘shewing’ surely his phone has spellcheck?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?