Congratulations @Lochness Monster for naming the thread, and @Patriciarella for nominating the thread title - I had to do some creative work to make it fit.
[IMG alt="Jules100"]https://media3.tattle.life/data/avatars/m/192/192001.jpg?1690214720[/IMG]
Jules100
VIP Member
Saturday at 12:01 AM
MRShavershamsdress
VIP Member
Thursday at 2:32 PM
@Jules100 I hope you’ll tell us what happened to cause this decision when you’re ready. Also, I’m hoping that you weren’t threatened into it. CWU will be missed, especially as the shat-oh cling-ons will now be crowing they’ve triumphantly won against the evil tattlers.
Karma baby!
VIP Member
Friday at 12:52 AM
Jules100
VIP Member
Thursday at 2:54 PM
KiKiGee
VIP Member
Friday at 7:08 PM
Unika Sjaelful
1 hour ago
Am I the only one who was really distressed to see the little peachick gasping for air? The poor little thing. Why would one air this?! A statement and/or the burial would have sufficed. It's shocking and triggering that someone would exploit such a dire situation. Don't you have other content to focus on, like your renovations? I used to have admiration for Stephanie, to find success at a later stage of her life, going for her dreams. The sincerity and authenticity have evaporated. Now it's literally a "show" among many other shows produced for entertainment and economic purposes.
Laurie Calery
1 hour ago
Sharing my perception. I really dont like the click bait titles and especially dont appreciate the way you post not so great pictures of your mum, it's really disrespectful.
Tuo Inglese
3 hours ago
Sorry to say but no wonder you keep losing peachicks! A simple google search will tell you how to properly care for peachicks. They don't even have a safe enclosure! Seems like it's all for views....
Karima Dillon El-Toukhy
5 hours ago
Can anyone explain to me grieving over the death of one animal whilst slaughtering and eating another animal
janet thomas
6 hours ago
I thought a person had died
Adding @Rory 's post - as much as we derail, Rory has a point.
Rory
VIP Member
Yesterday at 1:30 PM
Our group has grown/evolved over the 3 years I have been here. There are a few Tattlers on here who are residing in France and/or have knowledge of French tax law.
If we return our Tattle focus to the financial situation of a foundation established (by Stephanie) for the restoration of the farmhouse owned by 3 persons (Stephanie, Potts and Nick - although I still think Isabelle owns a percentage of Stephanie’s portion via a family trust), yet publicised via vlogs and managed by the directors-Stephanie, Isabelle and Natti - where does the liability for non compliance with tax laws sit? With Stephanie and the foundation directors or are owners of building included? I mean surely the directors of the foundation ALL have to sign off on the annual taxation report. (How’s that English language understanding going Natti?)
And how would the accountability for tax declarations and processing be assigned - with the original accountants and/or possibly Philip’s father? With the owners? With the foundation directors?
I would appreciate clarity on this from European/French based Tattlers.
And if the farmhouse association is French based how does that work if Stephanie is UK tax domicile?
Could a financial investigation also extend to groups (such as Brenda’s Facebook page) which (falsely) promote the activities of the directors of the foundation? My understanding is Brenda’s jurisdiction is EU - please correct me if I am wrong.
Whilst I appreciate derails, good wishes, sympathies shared, etc let us not lose sight of the financial questions and grievances which started and grew this thread originally.
And as we hypothesise over the last weeks on Amaury and Natti’s exit from the farmhouse vlogs, let us not forget she is a director of the association which was formed to minimise tax, yet renovate a farmhouse. I mean if something awful should happen like a legal investigation by the French tax office who would pay for Natti’s legal bills? I do wonder if the Argentinian understands her legal position and liability, Let us not forget Stephanie’s “welcome to the family” speech once it was established that Amaury and Natti were an item (or regular dalliance). Yes welcome indeed Natti to the financial liability. I do hope she understands her liabilities and risks.
Remember we have a wonderful wiki, archiving Stephanie's shyte
Happy Tattling.
[IMG alt="Jules100"]https://media3.tattle.life/data/avatars/m/192/192001.jpg?1690214720[/IMG]
Jules100
VIP Member
Saturday at 12:01 AM
Thank you for your support @lalablahblah. I did have serious concerns about a batch of chateau garbage that threatened and tried to dox me back in February that also followed me over and singled me out YouTube. I raised my concerns several times, but they fell on deaf ears.lalablahblah said:
My concern for Jules was becoming the obsession of 1 of those gray cray crayes... I'm sure a few gangsta grannies live in Florida... I've heard horror stories from YouTubers...I've been harassed on Facebook by some insane Qtips for not drinking the kookaide.... Nut jobs get ballsy...
MRShavershamsdress
VIP Member
Thursday at 2:32 PM
@Jules100 I hope you’ll tell us what happened to cause this decision when you’re ready. Also, I’m hoping that you weren’t threatened into it. CWU will be missed, especially as the shat-oh cling-ons will now be crowing they’ve triumphantly won against the evil tattlers.
Karma baby!
VIP Member
Friday at 12:52 AM
Seems like Amaury has finally drawn a line in the sand… he hasn’t been on the vlogs for some time now. Good for him.Lochness Monster said:
Amoury did not want to celebrate his Aunts birthday
Jules100
VIP Member
Thursday at 2:54 PM
No one threatened anyone. This was entirely my decision.MRShavershamsdress said:
@Jules100 I hope you’ll tell us what happened to cause this decision when you’re ready. Also, I’m hoping that you weren’t threatened into it. CWU will be missed, especially as the shat-oh cling-ons will now be crowing they’ve triumphantly won against the evil tattlers.
KiKiGee
VIP Member
Friday at 7:08 PM
Unika Sjaelful
1 hour ago
Am I the only one who was really distressed to see the little peachick gasping for air? The poor little thing. Why would one air this?! A statement and/or the burial would have sufficed. It's shocking and triggering that someone would exploit such a dire situation. Don't you have other content to focus on, like your renovations? I used to have admiration for Stephanie, to find success at a later stage of her life, going for her dreams. The sincerity and authenticity have evaporated. Now it's literally a "show" among many other shows produced for entertainment and economic purposes.
Laurie Calery
1 hour ago
Sharing my perception. I really dont like the click bait titles and especially dont appreciate the way you post not so great pictures of your mum, it's really disrespectful.
Tuo Inglese
3 hours ago
Sorry to say but no wonder you keep losing peachicks! A simple google search will tell you how to properly care for peachicks. They don't even have a safe enclosure! Seems like it's all for views....
Karima Dillon El-Toukhy
5 hours ago
Can anyone explain to me grieving over the death of one animal whilst slaughtering and eating another animal
janet thomas
6 hours ago
I thought a person had died
Adding @Rory 's post - as much as we derail, Rory has a point.
Rory
VIP Member
Yesterday at 1:30 PM
Our group has grown/evolved over the 3 years I have been here. There are a few Tattlers on here who are residing in France and/or have knowledge of French tax law.
If we return our Tattle focus to the financial situation of a foundation established (by Stephanie) for the restoration of the farmhouse owned by 3 persons (Stephanie, Potts and Nick - although I still think Isabelle owns a percentage of Stephanie’s portion via a family trust), yet publicised via vlogs and managed by the directors-Stephanie, Isabelle and Natti - where does the liability for non compliance with tax laws sit? With Stephanie and the foundation directors or are owners of building included? I mean surely the directors of the foundation ALL have to sign off on the annual taxation report. (How’s that English language understanding going Natti?)
And how would the accountability for tax declarations and processing be assigned - with the original accountants and/or possibly Philip’s father? With the owners? With the foundation directors?
I would appreciate clarity on this from European/French based Tattlers.
And if the farmhouse association is French based how does that work if Stephanie is UK tax domicile?
Could a financial investigation also extend to groups (such as Brenda’s Facebook page) which (falsely) promote the activities of the directors of the foundation? My understanding is Brenda’s jurisdiction is EU - please correct me if I am wrong.
Whilst I appreciate derails, good wishes, sympathies shared, etc let us not lose sight of the financial questions and grievances which started and grew this thread originally.
And as we hypothesise over the last weeks on Amaury and Natti’s exit from the farmhouse vlogs, let us not forget she is a director of the association which was formed to minimise tax, yet renovate a farmhouse. I mean if something awful should happen like a legal investigation by the French tax office who would pay for Natti’s legal bills? I do wonder if the Argentinian understands her legal position and liability, Let us not forget Stephanie’s “welcome to the family” speech once it was established that Amaury and Natti were an item (or regular dalliance). Yes welcome indeed Natti to the financial liability. I do hope she understands her liabilities and risks.
Remember we have a wonderful wiki, archiving Stephanie's shyte
Happy Tattling.