Seems very likely she will be addressing this tomorrow, yes. I think she practising the word "unfortunate" today in front of the mirror, checking the angles of where the smoke needs to be.
The Chateau Diaries #123 Natalia .O bullies Selmar, Stephanie J. hides the accounts, business as usual at LL
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I totally agree with you @Jeeves, for all the reasons you have stated.
BUT, the difference here is that Dan and Annalise, between themselves decided, for whatever reasons, to embark on a YT vlog about their life.
You, me and lots of other people have decided not to, for obvious reasons.
Therefore, some, and I 100% stress some, people feel that they have been duped, especially their Patrons. I am in no way invested because I personally have never, ever felt the need to give money to any YouTuber.
You, quite rightly, suggest giving them space and, for what it is worth, I again agree.
BUT, let's not forget, one day after Dan's announcement about their split was made public up pops another vlog - thereby in doing so, they have not given themselves space perhaps.
IMHO, if they truly want/or need space, then sorry, that should not have happened, or, have been filmed/published.
And, for the record, I too agree with you, no-one ultimately needs to make any kind of vicious comments, IMHO, just observations, which at the end of the day, may or may not be how it all plays out.
Anybody who feels the need to put their life on YT, just like any other person in whatever form of media, has to be prepared to take the rough with the smooth.
Last edited:
True, he still can't bring himself to face the harsh truth. Nat would have never said or done anything without SJ and IJ approval. So, if I understood well, he was willing to help and work for a small sum or even for free, because he is indeed a sweet person, probably thinking that the two hags were broke and needy as they told everybody. But, as soon as he saw what huge amount of money was coming in and the work he was required to do was always increasing, he felt he should ask for an increase. And rightly so! What he didn't know is that no narc would allow that. They feel entitled to decide for other people lives and how to exploit them. So probably SJ arranged for Natty to do the dirty job and make their stay impossible. Otherwise SJ would have told her off and set things right. She didn't, so she is the instigator. End of the story. Selmar looks to me to be an innocent soul and he was obviously very affectionate to SJ and her black soul of a mother, so it must be quite painful for him. I think that at the moment he's still in denial. But at least he's been brave enough to tell the truth.
Good for him. He did help the Jarvises in uncertain times for almost no pay at all, and clearly didn't deserve this kind of exit fom the chateau. Unfortunately, Oliveto is going nowhere. SJ will try to never have to address this situation and will deflect with other crap going on. Unless the viewers demand an explanation, Natalia will wash her hands off of this and won't address none of this either. Even offering a fake apology is too much of a stretch for these type of women.
If she’s not already on her way out, and if SJ wants to keep her, SJ will have to mount a full blown offensive to paint Nutty as a saint. The thing is, SJ needs someone like Nutty to do her dirty work. That way SJ avoids uncomfortable confrontations and keeps her hands clean. If Nutty goes, either SJ has to do the dirty work herself or find someone else. The hardest part of being a boss is dealing with uncomfortable situations, sometimes delivering bad news, or dealing with a delicate issue. SJ hates doing that…I’ll bet she tries hard to salvage Nutty. It may not work…the damage is severe…but I bet she’ll try. And if Nutty does go, yes, I fully believe she’ll take down as many as she can on her way out the door.
That crossed my mind too.
But it doesn't hurt to take into account the feelings of the ones who are not a part of her shitshow and so far have managed to stay out of it one way or another.
Quite an agenda
guess they all blew their wad …. Again
it’s libellous … leaste WE know the difference.
I’d like to think he became close to Sabine after the separation, it has been 6 months after all….
OMG, I really can't keep up with how fast these posts move. And, I am semi retired so have more time BUT this is like a full time job. Please can someone direct me to the first comment regarding Selmar because I can't possibly wade through all the comments at this stage - what exactly has happened?
all pointed out-for the last 3 days on tattlePeacock rescuer and Lalande volunteer....
View attachment 1111042
Jenni Stevenson
7 hours ago
I had no doubt whatsoever that you would be helping refugees from Ukraine immediately. I can offer some temporary accommodation to refugees as well but don’t know how to go about it. I have e mailed the red cross. Perhaps the person coming to Lalande has friends or family who need somewhere to stay. I am near a TGV station to Paris. Nati do please give her my number if appropriate , thanks xxxx
REPLY
View attachment 1111043
Chateau Unwrapped!
6 hours ago
We will definitely ask her
REPLY
View attachment 1111044
Natalia Oliveto
6 hours ago
Thank you so much Jenni! We will be in touch
Then eh voila … a random person just dosent know how to Google or the local gov office
and needs Stephanie jarvis to get the info …..
I-truly blame Isabel Jarvis for abandoning her child
- she’s not fit to be left alone with this social media the lies …..Okay, I'll give her till the real mean b**ch returns. When did Mummy say she wants to be back? After all, that is all Nutty ever was, a replacement for the mother from hell.
kaboooooom 
And a ‘ warning’ that SJ said to Nasty Natti
as in ‘Natti I know I said get rid of them, but seriously love, be a bit nicer next time’. Poor Selmar, you fell for that so called chat across the table.
sad thing is Selmar puts the blame squarely at Nasty Natti’s feet, but surely he must know by now, she’s SJ’s Rottweiler, doing her dirty work and promoting the charade of a happy shitoooo
in any event, good on Selmar for getting that put in the open.
Over to you Stefaneeeeeeeeee or should I say Nataleeeeeeeee
And a ‘ warning’ that SJ said to Nasty Natti
as in ‘Natti I know I said get rid of them, but seriously love, be a bit nicer next time’. Poor Selmar, you fell for that so called chat across the table. sad thing is Selmar puts the blame squarely at Nasty Natti’s feet, but surely he must know by now, she’s SJ’s Rottweiler, doing her dirty work and promoting the charade of a happy shitoooo
in any event, good on Selmar for getting that put in the open.
Over to you Stefaneeeeeeeeee or should I say Nataleeeeeeeee
I think that sums up how welcome Selmar was at that point. His monotonous drumming on those stupid bongos was beyond annoying.
I know no more than what I see on here. It is opinion and not fact. I am merely stating what I would do.
Scroll back and watch his patron video, posted earlier in this thread.
Absolutely agree with that!
Gives me a different perspective of Selmar now. He seems really gentle. I just wish he could actually edit a video. It's fairly obvious SJ is behind it all. What a narc.
Yes. And you were right to point this out of course.
- Status