The Archie Battersbee case #17

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Sorry, stupid question time. How do I get to the first page (that is "The Archie Battersbee Case #1")?

I'll delete this post once I have an answer.

Thank you
Starts here:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
For some reason, much of the underclass - aka chavs, hate the emergency services. They'll set light to ambulances, throw bricks at fire engines... so I can only imagine the police get it worse.
Police are pigs, filth, and only out to get them. To the white underclass, nothing is ever their fault. Their problems are something that just happened to them; not as a result of their choices, actions or poor judgement. In fact, all authority figures are out to get them, impinge upon their freedom, and oppress them. Police are the worst of all because the police are the ones nicking them for [insert litany of petty crimes here] and stopping them from doing what they want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Talking of lovely Tom, I'm not sure if it has been mentioned on here that in January he announced his clothing line... brand name 'Calculated Violence'. 🤣😜
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Will the Judge be imposing a sentence like this teenagers? 6 years 3 months prison.


Norfolk teen who used car as weapon jailed over attack
A teenager deliberately drove his van into a man walking along a quiet country road, leaving his victim with serious injuries.
Marley Rodgers knew the man he targeted and had been in a long-running dispute with him.
Norwich Crown Court was told the 19-year-old came across the victim by chance as he was driving along the B1116 at Weybread, near the Norfolk-Suffolk border.
Andrew Jackson, prosecuting, said as soon as he saw the man Rodgers steered his van directly across the road towards the victim.
He said the victim saw the van coming at him and had no time to "escape the inevitable collision", although he did have "the presence of mind to jump upwards" just before he was struck.
As Rodgers revved the engine again, the victim - who feared he was about to be reversed over - was able to get up and run to a nearby house.
Rodgers drove off, but a passenger in a passing car managed to take his registration number and contact police.
Officers caught up with Rodgers in Long Stratton where they also found his damaged van.
The court heard the victim, who works in a scrap yard, was left with a "life-changing injury" to his elbow.
Mr Jackson said the attack was "in the context of an ongoing dispute" between the pair, stemming from a falling out between Rodgers and the victim's son two months earlier which had seen Rodgers chase him with a knife.
Rodgers, of Lime Tree Avenue, Long Stratton, appeared at court for sentencing on Tuesday after he admitted causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent over the incident on September 6, 2025.
He had already pleaded guilty to separate offences of threatening behaviour, possessing a machete and possession of nitrous oxide on June 13, 2025.
Imposing an extended eight year, three-month sentence - made up of six years and three months custody and two years on licence - Recorder Nicola Fitches said: "When you saw your victim you made a choice. The choice you made to drive at him at speed could've killed him."
"There is no doubt the van was used as a weapon and it's a highly dangerous weapon," she said.
Before Rodgers was sentenced the court heard a statement from the victim who said the injury to his arm has had a "profound" and "life-changing" impact on him.
He has had to reduce his hours at the scrap yard and has also had to give up motocross riding due to his injury.
Rob Pollington, mitigating, said Rodgers made a "horrendously poor decision".
Rodgers was also banned from driving for a total of six years.
He was also made the subject of a restraining order and was banned from contacting the victim directly or indirectly for an indefinite period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Jailed for causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent, the same offence that Hollie and Tom were found guilty of.

There is a big difference (to me) between the two offences though. Recorder Nicola Fitches said of Rodgers: "When you saw your victim you made a choice. The choice you made to drive at him at speed could've killed him."

Hollie and Tom chased their victim from Southend to Basildon, which meant there was plenty of time for them to think of what they were doing, and for the "red mist" to clear. Rodgers ran his victim over on the spur of the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Hollie has been doing the rounds getting meetings with the PM to discuss children who were taken by social media. She did say she couldn’t go but in normal circumstances she absolutely would be.

I can see her getting away with the car incident
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 3
I can see her getting away with the car incident
She, and Tom, have been found guilty, so they are not getting away with it. A jury of their peers found them guilty

As for the sentencing, that's different, its down to one person, the Judge

But seeing as that offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, I very much doubt both will get anything other than custodial sentences, even with a lenient judge.

Only 3 days until we find out.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
I do hope the judge and prosecutor has seen how she has conducted herself online since the verdict.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Hollie has been doing the rounds getting meetings with the PM to discuss children who were taken by social media. She did say she couldn’t go but in normal circumstances she absolutely would be.

I can see her getting away with the car incident
So she’s still letting on it was social media that did for poor Archie despite no evidence to that? She should let her poor kid rest and stop peddling lies about him.

Anyway, I feel sorry for the other women in the prison she’s hopefully about to go to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
You can follow today's sentencing of the pair on the Southend Echo website.

Sentencing will be a bit later than 2pm due to an overrun of this morning's session.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
You don't. Google Southend echo live court.

Hollie and Thomas are in the dock now, about to go underway.

I am on holiday, hence the hour ahead time.

20260529_152428.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
3:34pm29/05/26
Victim did not attack Dance's daughter, says prosecutor
Prosecutor Richard Scott is now on his feet, recapping the details of the offences.
He says the "persistent" attack on the victim, which began in Southend and ended in Basildon, was triggered by a mistaken belief that the victim had attacked Dance's daughter.
In fact, he says, the evidence presented at trial shows the victim "did nothing more, really, than trying to split up the fight" which had erupted between Dance's daughter and others in Meteor Road, Westcliff, on October 10 2022.
Dance and Summers were each convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent.
Summers had already pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by dangerous driving. The jury additionally convicted him of affray, over the attack on the victim's car windows in Chalkwell.
Dance had pleaded guilty to dangerous driving and was convicted by the jury of possessing an offensive weapon - a can of pepper spray with her DNA on it, found at the crash scene
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Not sure if others can follow the proceeding live, so I will post up what is going on:

3:54pm29/05/26
Victim Impact
"Mr Scott says: "There are a number of features which the prosecution suggest put this into the highest level of culpability."
He says the attacks "had a significant effect" on the victim, who is suffering "ongoing difficulties".
He is referring to victim impact statements from both the victim and his father.
However, neither statement has been read out in full. The victim's, written in July 2024, is seven pages long.
He describes "continuing physical issues", injuries to his knee, wrist and ankle, and having to undergo corrective surgery to his shoulder.
He paid for a private scan to his foot due to ongoing symptoms which uncovered a fracture to his heel. He then had to pay for private physiotherapy.
He ended up on strong painkillers.
"He could no longer ride his motorcycle as a consequence of these injuries," says Mr Scott.
He was left "extremely anxious and worried" due to "threats that were being made".
"I did not want to see anyone or do anything," the victim wrote. "Every conversation I had with people was about what had happened and I didn't feel that I could trust anyone because of the rumours that were made."
In the end, he left Essex - but even then he suffered flashbacks and routinely worried he was being followed in his car.
"I never understood why I was targeted that night," he wrote".

Seems that the victim suffered many injuries, which I have not seen listed before
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 11