I've never seen or heard of a petition about it. If there was fundraising involved the details should be out in the open.
It's on change.org under the not so articulate title "
The public deserve the truth of the social media campaign of the Archie Battersbee case".
It states...
"Many questions need to be answered when it comes to the UK case of Archie Battersbee, the 12 year old boy who was found unconscious by his mother with a ligature around his neck in April
These are the questions that need to be answered:
1) Why has the family been able to go on multiple news channels without their account being questioned despite the many many inconsistencies between interviews of what actually happened to Archie in April?
2) Why was money allowed to be raised by the public when it was announced in court and in court documents that all was ProBono? Where has the money gone?
3) Why is the mother now questioning Brain Stem Testing when she has said on multiple news channels that they never did the testing on Archie?
4) Why is the word “online challenge” allowed to be used when there is no evidence of this? “Essex Police has meanwhile confirmed it is not investigating the circumstances around Archie’s death” so there no proof of any online challenge taking place
5) Why was money raised within 3 days of entering hospital(10th April) when court fees was never needed? court started 27th April
6) Why do the media not discuss the facts and information that are in the official court documents from the medical professionals? instead they use a parents biased perspective?
7) Why was the GoFundMe and JustGiving reasoning allowed to be changed numerous times to fit the narrative that suits each time?
8) Why is a platform still being given to the parents to continue with the misinformation?
9) Why are the media and associates to Archie allowed to ridicule a hospital by using quotes from the family or live recording? without questioning the court document facts?
10) Why was a 12 year old boys privacy and dignity allowed to be disrespected and invaded on both the media and social media? And why was private medical letters and information allowed to be shown on a public platform (social media and the main stream media)
These need to be answered because from the start there are many inconsistencies, and even now there is so much that does not add up.
Many public members feel this innocent child has been exploited to fit the families agenda"