They are fugly.Oh do piss off Anna with your £235 pyjamas. FFS it is abhorrent. Who of her followers who are probably 20 somethings in low paid work can afford those especially at a time like this. Read the ffffing room woman
She looks huge! Not flattering at all!What in the sweet Jesus is this outfit
And those shoes, ughh!What in the sweet Jesus is this outfit
It's just a bit frumpy I think? She's a slim girl and I don't think she looks huge, but sometimes she picks bits that are quite frumpy. Maybe it's a "high fashion" thing I don't understand at all!She looks huge! Not flattering at all!
A lot of sustainable brands are disingenuous. People are using them to justify still buying loads but that's missing the point. IMO it's better to buy something cheaper and wear it to death, rather than an expensive item of clothing from a "sustainable" brand that will likely not get worn that oftenI'm not one to bash anyone for their clothing choices. Whatever floats your boat. However, I have no problem bashing Anna for her faux activism. She jumped on the sustainability bandwagon like the rest of them. But it doesn't mean the same thing to them as it does to me. To me it means repurposing things I already have or buying things that I want/need second hand. Not receiving #kindlygifted expensive garments from ethically sourced companies. She could probably find duplicates or close matches to most of her wardrobe in the charity shops or eBay. Will the fabrics be the same quality, maybe not. But you are still saving time, energy, and resources by buying second hand. The keyword there is buy. She'd actually have to purchase the items herself instead of waiting for these companies to shell out the freebies. I would say 90-95% of the insanely expensive stuff they own they didn't pay for. Even their furniture from West Elm was a brand deal she did when they first moved into that place. It's easy to be preachy and up your own ass when you aren't footing the bill.