The Anna Edit

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yeah I was never really into her expensive designer non capsule wardrobe but now more than ever it is just not relevant. People are losing their jobs. Losing their lives. Expensive face creams, blush and shoes just don't matter right now.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 6
Oh do piss off Anna with your £235 pyjamas. FFS it is abhorrent. Who of her followers who are probably 20 somethings in low paid work can afford those especially at a time like this. Read the ffffing room woman
They are fugly.

Still, at least her eyebrows aren't looking as crazy as normal. Or maybe that's just the distance
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The pj's are 500 pounds. I'm gobsmacked. She's so out of touch. Even if they are gifted, which she hadn't declared it's disgusting.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 8
In these last three posts alone I calculate that the tops and bottom cost over £1,500. That doesn’t count the make up (Tatcha Mask etc) and jewellery.

1. Half of it gifted no doubt which is proof these brands are just emperors new clothes.
2. People who can afford to shop these items wouldn’t be following Anna anyway.
3. The brands (apart from the PJs) actually have nice stuff but Anna always manages to pick the most old fashioned and frumpy bits
4. Anna is a grafter and seems nice I will give her that but she has lost touch IMO.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: 8
I notice someobe has connected on her Insta with no reply from her. She's really tone deaf.
 
No doubt its costs stupid money too. She looks like she raided David Attenborough's wardrobe.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
She dresses like a frumpy mum. I remember a few years ago her style was quite nice, what happened?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
She tries way too hard to be "cool", casually mentions oh this is from Dunelm a £500 puff stool, does her fan base really have that kind of income
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 4
Anna is “harmless “ in my opinion. Yes, her content is old, repetitive and pointless but she seems a genuine, nice girl.
But what the heck is going on with her brows? It is scary. And I think short hair doesn’t suit her at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Oh how have I just noticed that this thread is active again? I used to follow Anna but she’s another one that’s completely lost touch with reality. It’s eye watering the amount she spends on clothes and beauty products. Doesn’t she say she wants to buy a house? I’m sure she’s got a sizeable deposit sitting in her handbag drawer. 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
She looks huge! Not flattering at all!
It's just a bit frumpy I think? She's a slim girl and I don't think she looks huge, but sometimes she picks bits that are quite frumpy. Maybe it's a "high fashion" thing I don't understand at all!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I'm not one to bash anyone for their clothing choices. Whatever floats your boat. However, I have no problem bashing Anna for her faux activism. She jumped on the sustainability bandwagon like the rest of them. But it doesn't mean the same thing to them as it does to me. To me it means repurposing things I already have or buying things that I want/need second hand. Not receiving #kindlygifted expensive garments from ethically sourced companies. She could probably find duplicates or close matches to most of her wardrobe in the charity shops or eBay. Will the fabrics be the same quality, maybe not. But you are still saving time, energy, and resources by buying second hand. The keyword there is buy. She'd actually have to purchase the items herself instead of waiting for these companies to shell out the freebies. I would say 90-95% of the insanely expensive stuff they own they didn't pay for. Even their furniture from West Elm was a brand deal she did when they first moved into that place. It's easy to be preachy and up your own ass when you aren't footing the bill.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
I'm not one to bash anyone for their clothing choices. Whatever floats your boat. However, I have no problem bashing Anna for her faux activism. She jumped on the sustainability bandwagon like the rest of them. But it doesn't mean the same thing to them as it does to me. To me it means repurposing things I already have or buying things that I want/need second hand. Not receiving #kindlygifted expensive garments from ethically sourced companies. She could probably find duplicates or close matches to most of her wardrobe in the charity shops or eBay. Will the fabrics be the same quality, maybe not. But you are still saving time, energy, and resources by buying second hand. The keyword there is buy. She'd actually have to purchase the items herself instead of waiting for these companies to shell out the freebies. I would say 90-95% of the insanely expensive stuff they own they didn't pay for. Even their furniture from West Elm was a brand deal she did when they first moved into that place. It's easy to be preachy and up your own ass when you aren't footing the bill.
A lot of sustainable brands are disingenuous. People are using them to justify still buying loads but that's missing the point. IMO it's better to buy something cheaper and wear it to death, rather than an expensive item of clothing from a "sustainable" brand that will likely not get worn that often
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
She is a nice girl however she doesn't declare ads and right now is completely tone deaf. She is just as grabby as the rest of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I was so into Anna’s message of the capsule wardrobe, buying less but buying better, being sustainable. Until I realised that buying better means £200 jeans, £300 silk shirts, timeless handbags worth thousands.
anything affordable is gifted.
I’d understand the higher price points if she really did have less but she doesn’t, she is constantly buying new items. So it’s not “buy less buy better” it’s “buy more than you need at more than you can afford”.

I mean who would buy £300 cashmere joggers?

it’s also a really shallow existence to put so much value into material items. I love clothes but I’d choose a house over having a drawer full of designer bags. I also want to wear my clothes and feel comfortable not fearful that I’m going to ruin them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.