I’ve read far worse on twitter after a game of football than I’ve ever read on here.I kind of want to analyse them right back!
Like this part.
View attachment 2701322
I can’t speak for us all, but overall, we admit that we’re not all angels here, and are just genuinely exasperated that stories about “the worst of the internet” focus on Tattle when there really are worse sites, and well known ones at that.
---
Also, they quoted @Lanie (who I “know“ from the Jack Monroe threads) here -
(Their quote)
View attachment 2701333
but hilariously cut true “Lanie-ness“ of the post, like the word “petal”.
(original post)
View attachment 2701336
they acknowledged the KF analogy but don’t go further with it, why?? and then said Tattle was easy to dismiss as frivolous and harmless when it’s one of the most bitched and moaned about forums in mainstream publications (unjustly IMO, in comparison) out there, and in an article about how “dangerous” this place is. These people have scrambled eggs for brains.I kind of want to analyse them right back!
Like this part.
View attachment 2701322
I can’t speak for us all, but overall, we admit that we’re not all angels here, and are just genuinely exasperated that stories about “the worst of the internet” focus on Tattle when there really are worse sites, and well known ones at that.
---
Also, they quoted @Lanie (who I “know“ from the Jack Monroe threads) here -
(Their quote)
View attachment 2701333
but hilariously cut true “Lanie-ness“ of the post, like the word “petal”.
(original post)
View attachment 2701336
That bothered me too. It could have been a really interesting deep dive if they’d discussed why women (and some men like your good selfthey acknowledged the KF analogy but don’t go further with it, why?? and then said Tattle was easy to dismiss as frivolous and harmless when it’s one of the most bitched and moaned about forums in mainstream publications (unjustly IMO, in comparison) out there, and in an article about how “dangerous” this place is. These people have scrambled eggs for brains.
My favourite thread on this website is a rave thread for AutumnFunny they “studied” this thread which is in the Off Topic forum but then focused their paper on the content of threads in the Public Figure Gossip forum instead. Hello researchersyour paper is all wrong, we talk about things other than public figures and also have rave threads!
Don’t even get me started on the racist tweets after the Euros!I’ve read far worse on twitter after a game of football than I’ve ever read on here.
I love Lanie bless her for making it into a bit of “academia”I kind of want to analyse them right back!
Like this part.
View attachment 2701322
I can’t speak for us all, but overall, we admit that we’re not all angels here, and are just genuinely exasperated that stories about “the worst of the internet” focus on Tattle when there really are worse sites, and well known ones at that.
---
Also, they quoted @Lanie (who I “know“ from the Jack Monroe threads) here -
(Their quote)
View attachment 2701333
but hilariously cut true “Lanie-ness“ of the post, like the word “petal”.
(original post)
View attachment 2701336
Yes! Lanie you’re in an academic study pet!I love Lanie bless her for making it into a bit of “academia”
Did the research touch upon the fact women are disproportionately targeted by (oftentimes undeclared) influencer/peer to peer marketing and the impact that has on their financial and emotional wellbeing as a reason why we might all be here…
Thank you for replying & sorry I’m too lazy to read itYes! Lanie you’re in an academic study pet!
I need to read it properly but I don’t think they did, and honestly it’s a glaring omission, since it’s something you’ve brought up in this thread (which they’ve read) and realy would have made it a more thorough and interesting paper.
Are you kidding, they were the ones too lazy to think further after reading here!Thank you for replying & sorry I’m too lazy to read it
It sounds like shit though ngl. It could have been interesting if they spoke to all parties involved - influencers & their agencies/managers, CMOs/marketing professionals, read tattle, maybe even did some interesting quant analysis scraping content from tattle to look for themes or sought out as close to a representative sample of (verified!) active contributors as poss. It’s giving bare minimum gcse geography coursework - mumznet? Have you even visited the site fgs?
Looool literally, from “fans” as well.I’ve read far worse on twitter after a game of football than I’ve ever read on here.
This exactly. Some huns are incredibly nasty.Bullies and pack mentality make people post anonymously. You've only got to look at a Facebook community page to see how vile and aggressive the public are with their own stupid opinions. Even a non confrontational comment is met with hostility. The hunz on instagram, tiktok, youtube etc. Cannot stand one small criticism against their post, and God forbid anyone points out one of their lies. They scream "be kind" and then set their dogs on the poster, while they sit back encouraging it. The hypocrisy is off the scale, as another poster mentioned earlier. It is little wonder forums like Tattle exist.
They 100% had a premeditated conclusion. You only have to read the introduction or abstract to find that out. Basically 'Tattle Life is a gossip site mainly frequented by women who like to bitch about influencers and celebrities and who like to cry victim when they are criticised'. They'd made their minds up and just went through cherry picking snippets of comments to back up their argument. Absolutely no critical reasoning whatsoever. Glad I went to a second rate polytechnic and not Hawaii bloody UniversityAre you kidding, they were the ones too lazy to think further after reading here!
And I fully agree! omg some analysis looking for themes would be fascinating. And overall, yep, there’s so much potential for a really interesting (for some of us) paper, but it was wasted.
It’s like they had a premeditated conclusion before they studied anything, and stuck to that. (Basically us tattlers keep saying we’re bitchy, which we think minimises our comments, and if we call out the media misrepresentation of male vs female dominated forums, we‘re victimising ourselves).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?