Tammy Hembrow #4

[ClericalShadiness]

She put the video on private so she could delete all the Charlotte comments. It went back up yesterday with not a trace of Charlotte. Rotten POS

Use your brain logically, please.

Tammy’s not deleting comments to hide guilt, she’s doing it because people are posting unverified rumors that could literally mess with an ACTIVE LEGAL CASE.

Her silence isn’t ‘suspicious,’ it’s smart. That’s why Emilee, Amy, Starlette, Ava, and Max have not spoken about anything. If she clapped back or even acknowledged anything right now, it could be used against her or others later—it’s because they legally can’t.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

What the duck is wrong with you woman! Just STFU. Nothing has been said that's going to ruin anyone's case. Stop trying to find things to blame the victim with.

I’m not blaming the victim. I’m raising concerns about the public sharing of unverified info, especially when the case is ongoing. This isn’t about silencing victims; it’s about respecting the legal process. I don’t even care if I get banned for saying the stuff I’m saying because it needs to be said, lest become an echo chamber.

If you want to support the case, understanding how to protect it is important too. Just because someone speaks out doesn’t mean everything they say is fact until it’s confirmed in court. And if you actually cared about the victim, you would not be contributing to the spread of misinformation.

The fact that you’re reacting this way just shows how people are misunderstanding the situation.

There is a reason why Charlotte is speaking to ilkke about court documents and details that are not publicly available. It’s because she’s trying to control the narrative of the entire case. Even her liking Ilkke’s posts can be detrimental to the integrity of the case. The fact that some of you are so blood thirsty for drama and seeing Tammy get canceled is very concerning. It shows that you actually don’t care about justice.

 

[lifeingeneralsux]

I’m not blaming the victim. I’m raising concerns about the public sharing of unverified info, especially when the case is ongoing. This isn’t about silencing victims; it’s about respecting the legal process. I don’t even care if I get banned for saying the stuff I’m saying because it needs to be said, lest become an echo chamber.

If you want to support the case, understanding how to protect it is important too. Just because someone speaks out doesn’t mean everything they say is fact until it’s confirmed in court. And if you actually cared about the victim, you would not be contributing to the spread of misinformation.

The fact that you’re reacting this way just shows how people are misunderstanding the situation.

There is a reason why Charlotte is speaking to ilkke about court documents and details that are not publicly available. It’s because she’s trying to control the narrative of the entire case. Even her liking Ilkke’s posts can be detrimental to the integrity of the case. The fact that some of you are so blood thirsty for drama and seeing Tammy get canceled is very concerning. It shows that you actually don’t care about justice.

duck me dead. Be quiet woman. Do you think the victim is going to jeopardize her own case? She herself said we only know like 1% of what went down and that 1% is probably what Daily Mail reported. Agreeing that Tammy and family paying surety for bail isn't a criminal charge.

Who says this tit?-
"There is a reason why Charlotte is speaking to ilkke about court documents and details that are not publicly available. It’s because she’s trying to control the narrative of the entire case"

Is the narrative different? Tell us? Are you implying she's telling another one?

 

[Mikahla]

Isn't there a photo circulating of Henri with Posy in Tammys house recently?

End of March 2024. She also had a video of herself and Henri sitting on her couch, trying to get Henri to say hi to Posy because Posy was saying Hi Hi Hi and he ignored her and turned his head. Tammy was mad at Henri but laughing for the camera. I thought at the time it was a really odd video to upload because it wasn't nice at all

 

[ClericalShadiness]

duck me dead. Be quiet woman. Do you think the victim is going to jeopardize her own case? She herself said we only know like 1% of what went down and that 1% is probably what Daily Mail reported. Agreeing that Tammy and family paying surety for bail isn't a criminal charge.

Who says this tit?-
"There is a reason why Charlotte is speaking to ilkke about court documents and details that are not publicly available. It’s because she’s trying to control the narrative of the entire case"

Is the narrative different? Tell us? Are you implying she's telling another one?

This is the issue….. Charlotte’s narrative doesn’t line up with what’s been publicly reported by Daily Mail or the general legal timeline. According to the article (and Charlotte’s own statements), Henri’s alleged offenses occurred in 2023 - early 2024, and he’s been in a high-security prison since then. Yet Charlotte is now implying that he’s still actively orchestrating attacks from behind bars like some James Bond villain.

If she acknowledges that Henri has been in prison for over a year, she would also have to explain how he would magically know where she lives, or how he supposedly sent a trio of men after her without being detected by authorities who monitor all high-security prison visits and communications. That’s why the details are vague, and why ilkke is speaking on her behalf — it gives her enough distance to maintain the story while avoiding direct accountability for the inconsistencies.

 

[littlemissbun]

This is the issue….. Charlotte’s narrative doesn’t line up with what’s been publicly reported by Daily Mail or the general legal timeline. According to the article (and Charlotte’s own statements), Henri’s alleged offenses occurred in 2023 - early 2024, and he’s been in a high-security prison since then. Yet Charlotte is now implying that he’s still actively orchestrating attacks from behind bars like some James Bond villain.

If she acknowledges that Henri has been in prison for over a year, she would also have to explain how he would magically know where she lives, or how he supposedly sent a trio of men after her without being detected by authorities who monitor all high-security prison visits and communications. That’s why the details are vague, and why ilkke is speaking on her behalf — it gives her enough distance to maintain the story while avoiding direct accountability for the inconsistencies.

I haven't been closely following this story, but is every conversation he has with visitors and phone call monitored? Surely they wouldn't have the staff to listen to every inmates phone calls each time they make them. Record and maybe listen back to if needed maybe, but not sit around and listen to hundreds of calls a day? And when he has in person visits surely they don't have staff sitting with him.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

End of March 2024. She also had a video of herself and Henri sitting on her couch, trying to get Henri to say hi to Posy because Posy was saying Hi Hi Hi and he ignored her and turned his head. Tammy was mad at Henri but laughing for the camera. I thought at the time it was a really odd video to upload because it wasn't nice at all

Pretty sure that was Max, not Henri.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

I haven't been closely following this story, but is every conversation he has with visitors and phone call monitored? Surely they wouldn't have the staff to listen to every inmates phone calls each time they make them. Record and maybe listen back to if needed maybe, but not sit around and listen to hundreds of calls a day? And when he has in person visits surely they don't have staff sitting with him.

You’re right that staff don’t listen live to every call or sit in on visits. But in high-security prisons, everything is recorded and logged. Phone calls are tracked by number, name, date, and duration, and can be reviewed later if needed. Inmates can usually only call people on an approved contact list, so if someone makes a claim (i.e.- saying an inmate organized an attack or passed along threatening messages) authorities can go back and pull those call recordings, logs, and contact lists to verify whether to investigate.

Visitors have to sign in with ID, and their names, dates, and times are logged too. Plus, there are security cameras everywhere, including in the parking lot. So even if staff aren’t monitoring everything live, they have more than enough tools to track who an inmate has been in contact with, when, and how often, making it really difficult to secretly orchestrate something from the inside without leaving a trail.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

Pretty sure that was Max, not Henri.

In the video*

 

[cate92]

No one is saying don’t believe the victim. We are just saying reserve the judgement. If you have never met a woman (or man) who has lied about something serious to exact revenge or to get attention, then you are very lucky. My mother is a hard core narcissist and made accusations that my father was sexually assaulting us kids when he wasn’t. Didn’t matter that he was found innocent, his reputation still copped a beating because people chose to jump on board without hearing both sides and getting the facts. Victims should never be blamed but it’s not as black and white as “accuser=victim” and “accused=perpetrator”, that is naive and assumes that people don’t lie.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

No one is saying don’t believe the victim. We are just saying reserve the judgement. If you have never met a woman (or man) who has lied about something serious to exact revenge or to get attention, then you are very lucky. My mother is a hard core narcissist and made accusations that my father was sexually assaulting us kids when he wasn’t. Didn’t matter that he was found innocent, his reputation still copped a beating because people chose to jump on board without hearing both sides and getting the facts. Victims should never be blamed but it’s not as black and white as “accuser=victim” and “accused=perpetrator”, that is naive and assumes that people don’t lie.

I’m so sorry to hear that you endured that from your mother and I hope your father and your siblings have been able to recover from that.

As for this entire thing with Tammy, her brother, and the alleged victim, there are MAJOR inconsistencies in what has been shared on social media, and are potentially damning and might reveal an ever bigger scandal about to unfold. I looked at Charlotte’s profiles and found conflicting information about this alleged attack that took place and I personally think that she’s shutting down further questions because she wasn’t anticipating anyone clocking the minute details in her story….

 

[emmygluewho]

You’re right that staff don’t listen live to every call or sit in on visits. But in high-security prisons, everything is recorded and logged. Phone calls are tracked by number, name, date, and duration, and can be reviewed later if needed. Inmates can usually only call people on an approved contact list, so if someone makes a claim (i.e.- saying an inmate organized an attack or passed along threatening messages) authorities can go back and pull those call recordings, logs, and contact lists to verify whether to investigate.

Visitors have to sign in with ID, and their names, dates, and times are logged too. Plus, there are security cameras everywhere, including in the parking lot. So even if staff aren’t monitoring everything live, they have more than enough tools to track who an inmate has been in contact with, when, and how often, making it really difficult to secretly orchestrate something from the inside without leaving a trail.

All this is fairly correct except regarding visits. Yes, there is cameras but they don't pick up sound. Literally anything can be said, organised even passed through a visit. The only time it is recorded is when Police/Detectives are involved and plant a listening device close to the visitors/inmate.

Phone calls are all monitored and recorded although since COVID!? Tablets came in. They aren't monitored. Anything could be said or shown on those video calls. Inmates Literally have a tablet. I'm sure it varies jail to jail but The Maxos in Sydney!? Yes.

Also, with phone calls they can very easily use another inmates phone. Get numbers put on etc. Therefore 'under the radar' if they know intel are monitoring them

 

[ClericalShadiness]

All this is fairly correct except regarding visits. Yes, there is cameras but they don't pick up sound. Literally anything can be said, organised even passed through a visit. The only time it is recorded is when Police/Detectives are involved and plant a listening device close to the visitors/inmate.

Phone calls are all monitored and recorded although since COVID!? Tablets came in. They aren't monitored. Anything could be said or shown on those video calls. Inmates Literally have a tablet. I'm sure it varies jail to jail but The Maxos in Sydney!? Yes.

Also, with phone calls they can very easily use another inmates phone. Get numbers put on etc. Therefore 'under the radar' if they know intel are monitoring them

I think you are seriously underestimating how heavily monitored prisons are, especially high-security remand centers.

Every visitor has to provide ID, is logged, and is on camera the entire time before, during, and after the visit. All phone calls are recorded, tied to specific inmates, and call logs show who was contacted and when.

Even video calls (which were introduced after COVID) are tracked. The prison knows who’s calling who, when, and for how long. This isn’t some loophole-filled system.

Henri is 22, with no known gang ties or criminal network. The idea that he’s coordinating violent attacks from inside prison is beyond unrealistic. If this happened three weeks ago and was linked to him, police would have already traced calls or visits and made arrests.

And honestly, who’s risking jail time and their reputation for freaking Henri? There’s no clear motive or benefit. It’s just not logical.

 

[annaliesebeckley]

I haven't been closely following this story, but is every conversation he has with visitors and phone call monitored? Surely they wouldn't have the staff to listen to every inmates phone calls each time they make them. Record and maybe listen back to if needed maybe, but not sit around and listen to hundreds of calls a day? And when he has in person visits surely they don't have staff sitting with him.

He is in remand in Arthur Gorrie. They don't monitor anything because he's not convicted and sentenced yet. And even if he's sentenced to prison, they don't sit with you at visitation. He will be moved to another prison after the trial ends

 

[annaliesebeckley]

I think you are seriously underestimating how heavily monitored prisons are, especially high-security remand centers.

Every visitor has to provide ID, is logged, and is on camera the entire time before, during, and after the visit. All phone calls are recorded, tied to specific inmates, and call logs show who was contacted and when.

Even video calls (which were introduced after COVID) are tracked. The prison knows who’s calling who, when, and for how long. This isn’t some loophole-filled system.

Henri is 22, with no known gang ties or criminal network. The idea that he’s coordinating violent attacks from inside prison is beyond unrealistic. If this happened three weeks ago and was linked to him, police would have already traced calls or visits and made arrests.

And honestly, who’s risking jail time and their reputation for freaking Henri? There’s no clear motive or benefit. It’s just not logical.

You are incorrect. He's in remand.

No one has said he has arranged the attack. they have only said that he gave out her address and whomever had a hold of that info, did whatever with it. 3 men are responsible for that but if Henri passed on the address, he is accountable for that. So is the family member who helped find her.

 

[didshesaythat]

Pretty sure that was Max, not Henri.

Haven't you learnt yet. Shut your mouth woman.
You are trying way too hard to pull this victim down, lower than she probably already is. You are questioning everything. It's no wonder woman don't file charges. It's not the men you have to worry about, it's actually bleeping other women. Do you think she's going to risk a defamation case from the bleeping Hembrows by telling lies? This woman has to sit in court for days, weeks, maybe months and be cross examined time and time over and over. Isn't that bleeping enough for you?!

 

[ClericalShadiness]

Matt Poole’s pregnant girlfriend is out here hiking waterfalls and Matt Zukowski couldn’t even lift a finger for Easter with his stepkids. The bar is underground.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

He is in remand in Arthur Gorrie. They don't monitor anything because he's not convicted and sentenced yet. And even if he's sentenced to prison, they don't sit with you at visitation. He will be moved to another prison after the trial ends

….. Oh yeah, because ‘he’s just on remand’ means he’s got free rein to run criminal operations like he’s a mob boss, right? Visits are logged, IDs are required, calls are recorded, and even video calls leave digital trails. Authorities aren’t clueless—especially in a case like this. People really need to stop confusing real life with Netflix dramas.

ALSO: the victim is saying that a family member fave Henri location details of her whereabouts. Also, on April 12th, Charlotte said that she had to move interstate again. If that was the case, another family member would have been arrested by now and new conspiracy charges would have been added to Henri’s case, but none have been. What do you have to say about that!!???

 

[ClericalShadiness]

He is in remand in Arthur Gorrie. They don't monitor anything because he's not convicted and sentenced yet. And even if he's sentenced to prison, they don't sit with you at visitation. He will be moved to another prison after the trial ends

Remand doesn’t mean zero monitoring. Calls are still recorded, visitor logs are kept, and IDs are required—especially in high-profile or violent cases.

He’s not in a social club, he’s in a high-security facility. And whether convicted or not, authorities don’t just let inmates freely plot attacks. If something happened, police would already be looking into calls, visits, and digital trails.

Honestly re-read your own comment. Do you truly believe what you said!??? This isn’t a movie, it’s real life. Ask yourself what the likelihood is for Henri Thynne to plot an attack on his victim whilst in high security prison. This ain’t Utopia and Henri ain’t Jessica Hyde!

 

[ClericalShadiness]

Charlotte’s Instagram from April 1, 2025.

She said she got attacked 3 days prior (which would be March 29).

In the same story, she showed a photo of herself with caption “after 5 days of healing,” which if the attack was on March 29, then 5 days would make it April 3rd. She made that post on April 1. You can’t backdate something on an Instagram story.

April 5, 2025 Instagram story she says she was back in the gym one week after a concussion, doing leg day. How and why would you do leg day when you literally have an open would on one of them and it’s uncovered at a gym where sweat, dirt, and other things can get in it??!

And she blurred the cut on her leg (meaning it was presumably uncovered and you could see it) because she didn’t “want to give anyone the satisfaction?????” If she was in the gym without a bandage, people there would have seen it and CCTV would have seen it too if she was out it public.

April 12, 2025 she says that she is still afraid to post anything about the gym she trains at because the police have not found the 3 men who attacked her two weeks ago, but that makes no sense because she posted herself training at the gym on April 5th and as a matter of fact, she even said she was training after suffering a concussion which is ill advised and a doctor would most likely not have cleared her for strenous activities like that. Also, the police would not have wanted her to go to that gym for fear of the attackers seeing her there.

Then she goes on to say that she’s moving across interstate again.

She admits that it’s nearly been a year since the charges were filed against Henri which is the same thing that Daily Mail reported.
So if it’s been a year of Henri being behind bars, not knowing where she was, then how in the world did he plan an attack on her!?!?!

And how is she speaking about all of it to ikke and letting her make videos now if the police still haven’t found the guys?

I can also tell this is all recent because her manicure has remained perfectly pristine during the entire ordeal (which is also really odd if she was attacked by 3 men and she didn’t break any nails or sustain any defence wounds on her hands, arms, and legs.