Tammy Hembrow #4

[Mikahla]

….. Oh yeah, because ‘he’s just on remand’ means he’s got free rein to run criminal operations like he’s a mob boss, right? Visits are logged, IDs are required, calls are recorded, and even video calls leave digital trails. Authorities aren’t clueless—especially in a case like this. People really need to stop confusing real life with Netflix dramas.

ALSO: the victim is saying that a family member fave Henri location details of her whereabouts. Also, on April 12th, Charlotte said that she had to move interstate again. If that was the case, another family member would have been arrested by now and new conspiracy charges would have been added to Henri’s case, but none have been. What do you have to say about that!!???

Let me help you because I think you said you are from the USA. These are laws here in Australia:

Remandees are unsentenced and are innocent until proven guilty. The law does not regard their confinement as punishment. Therefore, remand prisoners are given maximum flexibility within their security rating and have fewer restrictions placed on them than convicted prisoners. Remand prisoners are treated with the minimum of restrictions that still ensure prisoner safety and good order, security and management of the prison.

Remand prisoners:

• are held separately from convicted prisoners, when practicable
• have increased access to visitors and telephone calls to access legal advice and representation
• have access to legal resources including a legal library
• are permitted to wear their own clothing if appropriate with their security rating
• are offered the opportunity (but are not obliged) to work

 

[doedoebirds]

This is the issue….. Charlotte’s narrative doesn’t line up with what’s been publicly reported by Daily Mail or the general legal timeline. According to the article (and Charlotte’s own statements), Henri’s alleged offenses occurred in 2023 - early 2024, and he’s been in a high-security prison since then. Yet Charlotte is now implying that he’s still actively orchestrating attacks from behind bars like some James Bond villain.

If she acknowledges that Henri has been in prison for over a year, she would also have to explain how he would magically know where she lives, or how he supposedly sent a trio of men after her without being detected by authorities who monitor all high-security prison visits and communications. That’s why the details are vague, and why ilkke is speaking on her behalf — it gives her enough distance to maintain the story while avoiding direct accountability for the inconsistencies.

People can upload photos on different dates. Why are you assuming these posts are in real time? But regardless, Henri was given bail for other crimes.

 

[lifeingeneralsux]

View attachment 3519386

Charlotte’s Instagram from April 1, 2025.

She said she got attacked 3 days prior (which would be March 29).

In the same story, she showed a photo of herself with caption “after 5 days of healing,” which if the attack was on March 29, then 5 days would make it April 3rd. She made that post on April 1. You can’t backdate something on an Instagram story.




View attachment 3519384
April 5, 2025 Instagram story she says she was back in the gym one week after a concussion, doing leg day. How and why would you do leg day when you literally have an open would on one of them and it’s uncovered at a gym where sweat, dirt, and other things can get in it??!

And she blurred the cut on her leg (meaning it was presumably uncovered and you could see it) because she didn’t “want to give anyone the satisfaction?????” If she was in the gym without a bandage, people there would have seen it and CCTV would have seen it too if she was out it public.



View attachment 3519385

April 12, 2025 she says that she is still afraid to post anything about the gym she trains at because the police have not found the 3 men who attacked her two weeks ago, but that makes no sense because she posted herself training at the gym on April 5th and as a matter of fact, she even said she was training after suffering a concussion which is ill advised and a doctor would most likely not have cleared her for strenous activities like that. Also, the police would not have wanted her to go to that gym for fear of the attackers seeing her there.

Then she goes on to say that she’s moving across interstate again.

She admits that it’s nearly been a year since the charges were filed against Henri which is the same thing that Daily Mail reported.
So if it’s been a year of Henri being behind bars, not knowing where she was, then how in the world did he plan an attack on her!?!?!

And how is she speaking about all of it to ikke and letting her make videos now if the police still haven’t found the guys?

I can also tell this is all recent because her manicure has remained perfectly pristine during the entire ordeal (which is also really odd if she was attacked by 3 men and she didn’t break any nails or sustain any defence wounds on her hands, arms, and legs.

duck you woman AGAIN. What the F is wrong with you? You are a new account. You have to be Henri or an associate forsure. Who says tit like this? Like I can not even fathom what's going on inside your head to think this. Regardless of my distaste for Tammy, I'm supporting this victim no matter who her assailant is.

This comment made me ill. I pray this never happens to you or someone you love and they have to go through the same scrutany that you are putting this woman through. Are you also going to say her hair wasn't messed up enough, make up still too perfect and clothing too clean? You are probably thinking that she deserved it because of the way she dressed Just fkn STOP.

 

[emmygluewho]

I think you are seriously underestimating how heavily monitored prisons are, especially high-security remand centers.

Every visitor has to provide ID, is logged, and is on camera the entire time before, during, and after the visit. All phone calls are recorded, tied to specific inmates, and call logs show who was contacted and when.

Even video calls (which were introduced after COVID) are tracked. The prison knows who’s calling who, when, and for how long. This isn’t some loophole-filled system.

Henri is 22, with no known gang ties or criminal network. The idea that he’s coordinating violent attacks from inside prison is beyond unrealistic. If this happened three weeks ago and was linked to him, police would have already traced calls or visits and made arrests.

And honestly, who’s risking jail time and their reputation for freaking Henri? There’s no clear motive or benefit. It’s just not logical.

I'm not underestimating anything champ, I've worked in this system for just shy of 15 years. All Maximum.

Yes, they are heavily monitored but then privatisation came in (Arthur Gorrie is Privately run so even less boots on the ground) where posts were stripped, towers de commissioned, cameras taken down. Do you think there is 1:1 ratio for inmate and Officer!? Surely you aren't that stupid!?

How do you think drugs come in!? Through a 'heavily monitored' visiting room. Where Officers can't have eyes and ears on 60 + crims. Do you think every letter sent out and in is read!? Do you think some Officers aren't corrupt!?

Do you legit think once in Jail these CRIMINALS are just well behaved!? Come the duck on. HAMZY orchestrated Murders from within prison. Not only that from bleeping Goulburn SUPERMAX.

Video calls came in during COVID. Due to COVID and no contact visits. Yes, the person who booked it is on The System. Who comes into view!? Might not be. Staff CAN'T listen or view these.

Risking jail time for Henri, darl it's using another crims phone line to make calls. No extra jail time. MAYBE an internal charge if that. And when currency is drugs!? They risk it. Reputation!? Bebs, what reputation They're in Green already.

'It isn't some loophole filled system' HAHAHAHA. Please, shutup. You're embarrassing yourself.

Stick to watching Wentworth.

 

[emmygluewho]

He is in remand in Arthur Gorrie. They don't monitor anything because he's not convicted and sentenced yet. And even if he's sentenced to prison, they don't sit with you at visitation. He will be moved to another prison after the trial ends

Most remand are maximum security. Definitely monitored. More so, as they could incriminate themselves via phone, visits. Police get evidence alot this way.

In saying that, even minimum security are monitored.

Due to cuts in funding, whilst ALL jails have monitoring!? Depending on boots on ground can determine how thorough they are

 

[Mikahla]

Most remand are maximum security. Definitely monitored. More so, as they could incriminate themselves via phone, visits. Police get evidence alot this way.

In saying that, even minimum security are monitored.

Due to cuts in funding, whilst ALL jails have monitoring!? Depending on boots on ground can determine how thorough they are

Appreciate your personal input. Very interesting. Not a job I could handle.

Maybe QLD is different but I looked it up and it's probably for another state and it says what I pasted below. Maybe QLD's crims are more violent and more monitored. Could also be different with every remand centre-

Remandees are unsentenced and are innocent until proven guilty. The law does not regard their confinement as punishment. Therefore, remand prisoners are given maximum flexibility within their security rating and have fewer restrictions placed on them than convicted prisoners. Remand prisoners are treated with the minimum of restrictions that still ensure prisoner safety and good order, security and management of the prison.

Remand prisoners:

• are held separately from convicted prisoners, when practicable
• have increased access to visitors and telephone calls to access legal advice and representation
• have access to legal resources including a legal library
• are permitted to wear their own clothing if appropriate with their security rating
• are offered the opportunity (but are not obliged) to work

 

[emmygluewho]

Appreciate your personal input. Very interesting. Not a job I could handle.

Maybe QLD is different but I looked it up and it's probably for another state and it says what I pasted below. Maybe QLD's crims are more violent and more monitored. Could also be different with every remand centre-

Remandees are unsentenced and are innocent until proven guilty. The law does not regard their confinement as punishment. Therefore, remand prisoners are given maximum flexibility within their security rating and have fewer restrictions placed on them than convicted prisoners. Remand prisoners are treated with the minimum of restrictions that still ensure prisoner safety and good order, security and management of the prison.

Remand prisoners:

• are held separately from convicted prisoners, when practicable
• have increased access to visitors and telephone calls to access legal advice and representation
• have access to legal resources including a legal library
• are permitted to wear their own clothing if appropriate with their security rating
• are offered the opportunity (but are not obliged) to work

Definitely might be different in other States. NSW Definitely mix sentenced and unsentenced. Pretty much due to shortage in beds. NSW STATE is just over 13,000 inmates.

That wording is definitely similar to ours. Pretty much just to cover a

 

[ClericalShadiness]

duck you woman AGAIN. What the F is wrong with you? You are a new account. You have to be Henri or an associate forsure. Who says tit like this? Like I can not even fathom what's going on inside your head to think this. Regardless of my distaste for Tammy, I'm supporting this victim no matter who her assailant is.

This comment made me ill. I pray this never happens to you or someone you love and they have to go through the same scrutany that you are putting this woman through. Are you also going to say her hair wasn't messed up enough, make up still too perfect and clothing too clean? You are probably thinking that she deserved it because of the way she dressed Just fkn STOP.

Idk why you are being rude because I haven’t cursed you or anyone else out.

I didn’t blame Charlotte. I pointed out public inconsistencies in her own posts. That’s not siding with an abuser, it’s asking questions.

If Charlotte is confident in her story, she shouldn’t need people like you foaming in the comments trying to shout down anyone who asks legitimate questions based on her own public posts. The inconsistencies are there. The timeline doesn’t add up.

That’s not “blaming the victim,” that’s looking at facts objectively. If/when a trial starts, lawyers are going to do the same exact thing I just did because you need to do that in order to find out the truth. There would be a lot of innocent people in jail right now if we didn’t look at the evidence and just blindly believe everything one side was saying.

Maybe instead of accusing people of siding with abusers, you should take a breath and actually read what was said. If you can’t handle someone pointing out gaps in the story without flying into hysterics, you’re part of the problem.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

Appreciate your personal input. Very interesting. Not a job I could handle.

Maybe QLD is different but I looked it up and it's probably for another state and it says what I pasted below. Maybe QLD's crims are more violent and more monitored. Could also be different with every remand centre-

Remandees are unsentenced and are innocent until proven guilty. The law does not regard their confinement as punishment. Therefore, remand prisoners are given maximum flexibility within their security rating and have fewer restrictions placed on them than convicted prisoners. Remand prisoners are treated with the minimum of restrictions that still ensure prisoner safety and good order, security and management of the prison.

Remand prisoners:

• are held separately from convicted prisoners, when practicable
• have increased access to visitors and telephone calls to access legal advice and representation
• have access to legal resources including a legal library
• are permitted to wear their own clothing if appropriate with their security rating
• are offered the opportunity (but are not obliged) to work

Yeah… you’re saying things that everyone is aware of. I’ve even said that he would have access to phones, visits, video chats, etc. and I never said that Henri was in solitary confinement 23 hours a day and only allowed outside for one hour lol idk why people are talking around what I’m saying.

THE PROBLEM IS:
His bail was denied in 2024. That means the court already considered him a risk likely due to his criminal history of stalking/intimidation, bail breaches, and violating probation. They would have placed him under strict monitoring.

Maximum-security remand isn’t a loophole for external communication with no oversight. Any suggestion of illegal coordination would trigger an immediate investigation and the accomplices would be jailed. If a family member was involved, they would be easy to identify and find by now. And all police have to do is trace everything back with phone records and CCTV footage. No one would risk jail time just to leak someone’s address, especially if there is no incentive for them to do so and if they did, they’d be charged.

So again, this isn’t about denying what Charlotte has gone through. It’s about asking people to stop spreading accusations against others like Tammy or unnamed “family members” without evidence or legal proceedings to back it up. I’m just calling for due process.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

People can upload photos on different dates. Why are you assuming these posts are in real time? But regardless, Henri was given bail for other crimes.

Because it was real time. These were Charlotte’s Instagram Stories posted on April 1. You can’t edit or add to them once they’ve already been posted and saved.

She said she was attacked 3 days ago (March 29), but in the same Story showed a photo labeled “after 5 days of healing”—which would be from April 3. That doesn’t make sense.

Ilkke’s April 13 video says the attack happened two weeks ago (around March 30), which is close, but still not exact. Also, Henri wasn’t out on bail—he was denied it in 2024 because he breached it 4 times prior to being arrested iand has been in max security prison since.

If you’re making serious claims tied to a legal case, the timeline should at least be consistent.

 

[Shouttoallmylostboys1]

Tammy's (almost) ten-year-transformation. It's the most terrifying thing I've seen. She aged herself and cheapened herself so badly with all the unneeded procedures. Younger Tammy had some work done, but had she kept it to a minimum, she would've aged much better. How sad will it be for her daughters to see pictures like these. None of her children will resemble her if she continues down the Soulless Sex Doll surgery road.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

Liking your wife’s Easter post while not even being there to celebrate it with her and her kids is crazy. He probably went to a football game or out partying instead…

 

[emmygluewho]

Yeah… you’re saying things that everyone is aware of. I’ve even said that he would have access to phones, visits, video chats, etc. and I never said that Henri was in solitary confinement 23 hours a day and only allowed outside for one hour lol idk why people are talking around what I’m saying.

THE PROBLEM IS:
His bail was denied in 2024. That means the court already considered him a risk likely due to his criminal history of stalking/intimidation, bail breaches, and violating probation. They would have placed him under strict monitoring.

Maximum-security remand isn’t a loophole for external communication with no oversight. Any suggestion of illegal coordination would trigger an immediate investigation and the accomplices would be jailed. If a family member was involved, they would be easy to identify and find by now. And all police have to do is trace everything back with phone records and CCTV footage. No one would risk jail time just to leak someone’s address, especially if there is no incentive for them to do so and if they did, they’d be charged.

So again, this isn’t about denying what Charlotte has gone through. It’s about asking people to stop spreading accusations against others like Tammy or unnamed “family members” without evidence or legal proceedings to back it up. I’m just calling for due process.

All on favour of ignoring this fuckwit!? Ignore from now.

As entertaining as her dribble is!? She can spew it elsewhere thinking she is out smarting everyone.

Jog on bebs.

 

[Amyzep]

Tammy's (almost) ten-year-transformation. It's the most terrifying thing I've seen. She aged herself and cheapened herself so badly with all the unneeded procedures. Younger Tammy had some work done, but had she kept it to a minimum, she would've aged much better. How sad will it be for her daughters to see pictures like these. None of her children will resemble her if she continues down the Soulless Sex Doll surgery road.

Are they her natural breasts in the white singlet or did she have implants way back then also? I'm not sure I've seen a photo of her before implants. She would look drastically different/ better with proportionate looking boobs.

 

[lifeingeneralsux]

Idk why you are being rude because I haven’t cursed you or anyone else out.

I didn’t blame Charlotte. I pointed out public inconsistencies in her own posts. That’s not siding with an abuser, it’s asking questions.

If Charlotte is confident in her story, she shouldn’t need people like you foaming in the comments trying to shout down anyone who asks legitimate questions based on her own public posts. The inconsistencies are there. The timeline doesn’t add up.

That’s not “blaming the victim,” that’s looking at facts objectively. If/when a trial starts, lawyers are going to do the same exact thing I just did because you need to do that in order to find out the truth. There would be a lot of innocent people in jail right now if we didn’t look at the evidence and just blindly believe everything one side was saying.

Maybe instead of accusing people of siding with abusers, you should take a breath and actually read what was said. If you can’t handle someone pointing out gaps in the story without flying into hysterics, you’re part of the problem.

It's not your bleeping business to be looking for inconsistencies and holes in her statement.

 

[ClericalShadiness]

And once again, Poole’s PREGNANT gf is proving that she’s a wayyyy better partner than Tammy & Zukowski. Helping him paint outside. She’s due next month too so she’s about to pop.

Matt Z. told everyone on his podcast that he doesn’t do manual labor. It’s beneath him.

 

[doedoebirds]

In the video*

Nope, that was Henri in that video on the sofa. The other video with Max, I think is still up somewhere. They were up dancing

Because it was real time. These were Charlotte’s Instagram Stories posted on April 1. You can’t edit or add to them once they’ve already been posted and saved.

She said she was attacked 3 days ago (March 29), but in the same Story showed a photo labeled “after 5 days of healing”—which would be from April 3. That doesn’t make sense.

Ilkke’s April 13 video says the attack happened two weeks ago (around March 30), which is close, but still not exact. Also, Henri wasn’t out on bail—he was denied it in 2024 because he breached it 4 times prior to being arrested iand has been in max security prison since.

If you’re making serious claims tied to a legal case, the timeline should at least be consistent.

I think you should take everyone advice and just stop. Daily Mail says he was denied bail one one charge but granted it on others. The snapshot is up there in the comments. So maybe he has spent time outside on those nails that were approved. I don't know. I don't care. And you know why I don't care? Because I'm not looking to disprove the victim

 

[shesnotallthatyouknow]

And once again, Poole’s PREGNANT gf is proving that she’s a wayyyy better partner than Tammy & Zukowski. Helping him paint outside. She’s due next month too so she’s about to pop.

Matt Z. told everyone on his podcast that he doesn’t do manual labor. It’s beneath him.
View attachment 3521118

They have Posy again too Tammy's birthday tomorrow, I wonder if she's taken off again with the man baby.
Just really shows how much Poole wasn't into Tammy. He never did anything like this for Tammy. I 100% believe he only stayed around because she was pregnant with Posy. Tammy obviously likes her men to take a back seat, like Zukowski.

 

[kmartplate]

Super curious to see if she spends her birthday with Matt. The weirdest part time marriage I’ve ever seen.

 

[Flourish&Fulfilled]

Because it was real time. These were Charlotte’s Instagram Stories posted on April 1. You can’t edit or add to them once they’ve already been posted and saved.

She said she was attacked 3 days ago (March 29), but in the same Story showed a photo labeled “after 5 days of healing”—which would be from April 3. That doesn’t make sense.

Ilkke’s April 13 video says the attack happened two weeks ago (around March 30), which is close, but still not exact. Also, Henri wasn’t out on bail—he was denied it in 2024 because he breached it 4 times prior to being arrested iand has been in max security prison since.

If you’re making serious claims tied to a legal case, the timeline should at least be consistent.

Hop off tattle Tammy you’re embarrassing yourself xxx