Tammy Hembrow #4

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
You’re actually proving my point. He wasn’t at Tammy’s wedding because he was in custody. IF she were really trying to “enable” him or excuse what he allegedly did, wouldn’t she have tried harder to get him out before her big day? His absence is what made people even start digging into the situation.

And where’s the proof that he was ever out on bail and violated it? That TikTok creator made serious claims — like him orchestrating an attack on the victim involving three people carving an “H” into her leg — but where are the follow-up charges, arrests, or police reports? That would be major news if it happened.

I’m not denying anyone’s trauma. That being said, when serious accusations like that are posted publicly, people deserve transparency. Otherwise, it turns into social media dramatics. The case is already horrific on its own, there’s no need to muddy it with exaggerations or fan theories.
What you have written is very disappointing and damn weird. I don't understand your undertone. I have just read through all the comments from the victim on Tiktok and it looks like she has confided with this "creator" and both say that no more can be said. I will leave it at that.

🤬 "And seriously, what criminal carves their own initial into a victim while already facing charges? That’s cartoon-level stupidity. Let’s please stop acting like wild speculation = advocacy"🤬

How could you say this? This carved out piece of skin was not from Henri, it was 3 men. Hang your head in shame
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
What you have written is very disappointing and damn weird. I don't understand your undertone. I have just read through all the comments from the victim on Tiktok and it looks like she has confided with this "creator" and both say that no more can be said. I will leave it at that.

🤬 "And seriously, what criminal carves their own initial into a victim while already facing charges? That’s cartoon-level stupidity. Let’s please stop acting like wild speculation = advocacy"🤬

How could you say this? This carved out piece of skin was not from Henri, it was 3 men. Hang your head in shame
I never said Henri personally carved it — I questioned the claim that three men allegedly attacked the victim on his behalf while he was out on bail. That’s a major accusation, and so far there’s no police report, added charges, or confirmation that he was even out of custody. If this really happened, where’s the actual proof? She needs to show the actual police report of this incident. How can she just divulge ALL of the details but then be like… “can’t talk anymore about it, SOZ! Follow me for updates!” Like what??? I don’t want to follow you, I want to follow the evidence and police reports. Wanting facts before blindly running with a sensational story isn’t shameful — it’s just basic critical thinking.

(edit: this is the last post/comment/reply I’m making about Henri. I said what I said. I implore people to actually think about all of this critically and stop adding onto an already bad situation. Hopefully the courts will deal out the appropriate punishment and justice will prevail.)
 
Last edited:
  • Angry
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 6
I never said Henri personally carved it — I questioned the claim that three men allegedly attacked the victim on his behalf while he was out on bail. That’s a major accusation, and so far there’s no police report, added charges, or confirmation that he was even out of custody. If this really happened, where’s the actual proof? She needs to show the actual police report of this incident. How can she just divulge ALL of the details but then be like… “can’t talk anymore about it, SOZ! Follow me for updates!” Like what??? I don’t want to follow you, I want to follow the evidence and police reports. Wanting facts before blindly running with a sensational story isn’t shameful — it’s just basic critical thinking.

(edit: this is the last post/comment/reply I’m making about Henri. I said what I said. I implore people to actually think about all of this critically and stop adding onto an already bad situation. Hopefully the courts will deal out the appropriate punishment and justice will prevail.)
Wow girl. Just wow. I'm glad it's your last post victimizing the victim 👏👏 and someone actually like it 😬
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
I never said Henri personally carved it — I questioned the claim that three men allegedly attacked the victim on his behalf while he was out on bail. That’s a major accusation, and so far there’s no police report, added charges, or confirmation that he was even out of custody. If this really happened, where’s the actual proof? She needs to show the actual police report of this incident. How can she just divulge ALL of the details but then be like… “can’t talk anymore about it, SOZ! Follow me for updates!” Like what??? I don’t want to follow you, I want to follow the evidence and police reports. Wanting facts before blindly running with a sensational story isn’t shameful — it’s just basic critical thinking.

(edit: this is the last post/comment/reply I’m making about Henri. I said what I said. I implore people to actually think about all of this critically and stop adding onto an already bad situation. Hopefully the courts will deal out the appropriate punishment and justice will prevail.)
duck off honestly
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
It's an ongoing case so there's only so much that can be publicly shared without damaging it or risk tainting his presumption of innocence and therefore having the case thrown out.
If you want all the details then you will have to follow it and attend when it goes to court if possible or wait for the media reporting.

No one is going to be releasing documentation to the media just because there's public interest surrounding it and you want to know the ins and outs before you believe the victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I actually think Tammy doesn't need to say anything about her brother. You can have family members where you don't approve of their behaviour.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 9
I actually think Tammy doesn't need to say anything about her brother. You can have family members where you don't approve of their behaviour.
Their behaviour? Do you mean intimidating, gaslighting, punching, stalking, manipulating and strangling a woman to near death? Takes, I think, 7 seconds for you to become unconscious and die from being strangled with only 5 kgs of weight on you. Tammy has no moral capacity whatsoever.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 7
You make it sound like he crossed the road with a red man
I kind of agree. My sister has substance abuse issues. Constantly has child protection in her life. You don't see me posting in support of her. Or posting her at all. Private lives stay private. But I think as a influencer it's a bit different. They make their money selling their lives, children and family. So people expect something? A few lines about DV and a help line in support of women. Then she never mentioned again is all it would take to shut everyone up. If she thinks her brother is innocent that's a bit different. She's named if does, damned if she doesn't in that situation.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 7
DV is disgusting but it’s innocent until proven guilty for a reason folks. As awful as men can be you’re kidding yourselves if you think women haven’t lied about tit like this before… look at Sherri Papini, look at Blake Lively currently trying to backtrack, look at Amber Heard. So maybe Tammy doesn’t have to say anything, maybe we can all reserve judgement since none of us (I believe) are actually qualified to do so, until things have been proven.
 
  • Sick
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 9
DV is disgusting but it’s innocent until proven guilty for a reason folks. As awful as men can be you’re kidding yourselves if you think women haven’t lied about tit like this before… look at Sherri Papini, look at Blake Lively currently trying to backtrack, look at Amber Heard. So maybe Tammy doesn’t have to say anything, maybe we can all reserve judgement since none of us (I believe) are actually qualified to do so, until things have been proven.
Mate he is in jail I think he’s been proven guilty. I agree though that Tammy doesn’t need to ever acknowledge it and it’s weird that people are mad at her about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Seems like she's purposely leaving matt out of content. Is he at the staycay with her?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Seems like she's purposely leaving matt out of content. Is he at the staycay with her?
If Matt's not there, who is? Because she got her bits out for someone. Posy is with her daddy and I'm guessing the other two are fobbed off with someone, not Emilee or Amy.

She's just hiding him because he brings her hate. She even removed the new TikTok with him because people were roasting her about how fake they were
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
If Matt's not there, who is? Because she got her bits out for someone. Posy is with her daddy and I'm guessing the other two are fobbed off with someone, not Emilee or Amy.

She's just hiding him because he brings her hate. She even removed the new TikTok with him because people were roasting her about how fake they were
if it’s this TikTok you’re referring to, it’s still up…. Unfortunately
IMG_4331.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
DV is disgusting but it’s innocent until proven guilty for a reason folks. As awful as men can be you’re kidding yourselves if you think women haven’t lied about tit like this before… look at Sherri Papini, look at Blake Lively currently trying to backtrack, look at Amber Heard. So maybe Tammy doesn’t have to say anything, maybe we can all reserve judgement since none of us (I believe) are actually qualified to do so, until things have been proven.

You are right. I’ve been trying not to get too deep into this, but it’s hard when Ilk or whatever her name is, is twisting the timeline and acting like everything Charlotte says is confirmed fact.

She is presenting serious accusations as facts without anything to back them up. The trial hasn’t even started, court documents aren’t public, and yet she’s claiming things like “Tammy paid for bail” and “the family helped track Charlotte down” like it’s confirmed info. It’s not. And honestly, I don’t even know why Charlotte is commenting at all. The case is still being investigated.

Any lawyer worth their weight would tell you that everyone involved, including family members, victims, etc., should be silent during the whole process. It’s bizarre to me that a victim is speaking through some random TikToker and also commenting under the videos about things that have not been reported to the public. Especially if she was attacked recently. Like isn’t that a safety concern? She basically outed herself….

And those who are asking her to provide proof (like actual court documents, not a few pics and blanketed statements from Charlotte) are being blocked or their comments are being deleted. She’s mixing speculation with alleged victim statements and calling it “advocacy.” That’s not advocacy, it’s irresponsible. There’s a reason no legit news outlets or drama podcasts have reported on anything this ilk person is saying. They can’t until the case is over. Just food for thought….
 
Last edited:
  • Sick
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 5
You are right. I’ve been trying not to get too deep into this, but it’s hard when Ilk or whatever her name is, is twisting the timeline and acting like everything Charlotte says is confirmed fact.

She is presenting serious accusations as facts without anything to back them up. The trial hasn’t even started, court documents aren’t public, and yet she’s claiming things like “Tammy paid for bail” and “the family helped track Charlotte down” like it’s confirmed info. It’s not. And honestly, I don’t even know why Charlotte is commenting at all. The case is still being investigated.

Any lawyer worth their weight would tell you that everyone involved, including family members, victims, etc., should be silent during the whole process. It’s bizarre to me that a victim is speaking through some random TikToker and also commenting under the videos about things that have not been reported to the public. Especially if she was attacked recently. Like isn’t that a safety concern? She basically outed herself….

And those who are asking her to provide proof (like actual court documents, not a few pics and blanketed statements from Charlotte) are being blocked or their comments are being deleted. She’s mixing speculation with alleged victim statements and calling it “advocacy.” That’s not advocacy, it’s irresponsible. There’s a reason no legit news outlets or drama podcasts have reported on anything this ilk person is saying. They can’t until the case is over. Just food for thought….
What the duck is wrong with you woman! Just STFU. Nothing has been said that's going to ruin anyone's case. Stop trying to find things to blame the victim with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.