Yuck. The whole “don’t contact us please, we and our friends are very busy with other things that come before your charitable needs”. So gross. You’re right that it’s too late for all this now. I saw a few comments on one of SV’s posts a couple of weeks ago from someone asking very politely about timelines because if people weren’t going to be “chosen” than they’d need time to make other plans. And SV was very nicey nicey and obsequious about it. Whoever that was could obviously tell where this was going...
Susie Verrill #5 Shopping Guru, very woke. Thank goodness for swipe-ups or she'd be broke
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I wonder when the “mum of boys” will be edited out of her bio.
So much for being Gender neutral, but then the only thing she goes on about is the gender of her kids
doesn’t seem to make sense to me!
So much for being Gender neutral, but then the only thing she goes on about is the gender of her kids
doesn’t seem to make sense to me!Let's not forget she sat exams in the period when they were completely dumbed down. And just before they were overhauled for more tougher exams. Im involved in recruitment at work and when we see cvs from that period literally every candidate has 10 x A start gcse and 3 a grade a levels. We rarely interview those people unless they have outstanding experience which they rarely do.Why would a 30 something year old still even mention their A level grades? Imagine achieving so little that you still even feel the need to mention that, let alone boast
Me neither. And wasn’t she ordering a tutu or something the other day for the new arrival? I suspect there will be nothing neutral about a girl baby - pink, frilly and girly all the way.I wonder when the “mum of boys” will be edited out of her bio.
So much for being Gender neutral, but then the only thing she goes on about is the gender of her kids
Oh the contrary I think she'll like to continually show her non gender (expensive!) specific clothing.
&I find it so bizzare they found out whether it was a boy/girl each time..... Whilst claiming to be non gender household.....
Wait til her daughter is 3 and potentially like mine will only wear pink or purple, refuse to even consider trousers and cries when she has to wear her green coat because the other is in the wash... I wouldn’t have it any other way either, you can have all the ideas about being gender neutral but some girls are very girly some boys are into only cars and mud and there is nothing wrong with that just as there is nothing wrong with them being interested in toys and clothes generally considered to be for the opposite gender. Just relax and let them be what they want
She's such a gender neutral supporter she's transparent. Me, me, me.
Out of interest which period does that cover? I have 10 A* GCSEs and 3 A grade A levels and I always thought I was super smart and now I’m worried I’m not
- would have been 2001 GCSEs and 2003 a levels...?! 
Absolutely this! All you can actually do is support the fact that they can play with or wear whatever they want, that there aren't "boys toys" and "girls toys" etc- but at a certain point, THEIR own taste and preferences take over! My nephew loved pink when he was little, and played with a pushchair, but in his early teens he's all about the neutral sports wear and video games- maybe his taste has naturally changed or perhaps society has conditioned him out of it- but you don't see my sister making him wear pink still just to make the point that she is SO WOKE as a parent. She let's him wear what he wants. Those boys, and the baby on the way, are going to grow up exactly like any other children and have their own tastes and opinions and it won't matter how painfully neutrally they were dressed as kids- they will be themselves, have phases, like things Susie doesn't want them to, etc... I'm all for not forcing square pegs into round holes, but they will eventually find their own niche.
Such a good point about Susie being supposedly gender neutral
So many grateful people messaging her to say “thank you” because the voucher has relieved them from having to count the cost as they add various items to their shopping... Next post on her story is her letting the world know she’s buying a tree skirt tomorrow - a totally, unnecessary expense. Ever mindful, Susie
Attachments
Urgh the poverty porn and giant pat on the back she's giving herself courtesy of the vouchers other people paid for. You're still a racist bigot Susan.
Her patting herself on the back showing all those messages is the one and only reason she did the 50 thing. All about being a martyr. And revelling in feeling all smug and patronising 
Great minds
I mean I assume Greg’s management (as Susie doesn’t a power to have any now) came up with the voucher idea.
So I haven’t been on here in a good while so Im going over old ground BUT her exact words, if memory serves me correctly were ‘this is not going anywhere’ RE the apology she highlighted and has now buried.
Im also annoyed that he still seems to be plugging some brands who are oblivious to it all (quite frankly shame on them for thinking hes squeaky clean just because hes a bit boring) silence is complicit in my opinion.
I think if ever there were an example of white privilege it is how she seems to have gotten an VERY easy ride for those disguisting tweets. People who said less have lost their jobs and careers.
if any baby brands try to work with her i will be contacting them immediately. They were all so quick to make ‘BLM Statements’ and now the proof will be in the pudding.
Im also annoyed that he still seems to be plugging some brands who are oblivious to it all (quite frankly shame on them for thinking hes squeaky clean just because hes a bit boring) silence is complicit in my opinion.
I think if ever there were an example of white privilege it is how she seems to have gotten an VERY easy ride for those disguisting tweets. People who said less have lost their jobs and careers.
if any baby brands try to work with her i will be contacting them immediately. They were all so quick to make ‘BLM Statements’ and now the proof will be in the pudding.
Did your neighbour get her voucher in the end?
When you consider the fallout of the Clemmie Hooper scandal- one or two comments here, under a pseudonym (still racist)- the woman has all but vanished from insta, been in the tit at work, allegedly had women refuse to be treated by her, and her husband (who she referred to here as a "class A twit") cannot get an #ad now to save his life (also partly his own fault), its ASTONISHING that Susie's stream of vitriol against several groups under her own actual name seem to have gone unnoticed by so many. CH was the subject of articles and all sorts, and it still comes up a year on whenever anyone is daft enough to try to collaborate in anyway! Either some OUTSTANDING damage control has been done presumably to protect Greg's earning potential now she's going to be a faux woke SAHM to 3, or, maybe, just maybe, not many people know or care about Susie and it turns out you need more than a former athlete fiance, a sarky attitude and endless trips to an orange land called Arizona to be "famous".
She was one of the first to post on her insta throwing CH under the bus too and clearly revelled in it - you’d have thought she’d be a bit quieter knowing her back catalogue of awful tweets.
I don’t follow Greg or Susie anymore, but I just had a sponsored/promoted story pop up on Instagram from Greg’s account. I didn’t pay attention to what he was trying to flog, did report it though.
Unfortunately there wasn’t an option for ‘your girlfriend is racist/ableist/generally a nasty bit of work and because you haven’t ever addressed it you are too by association’.
Unfortunately there wasn’t an option for ‘your girlfriend is racist/ableist/generally a nasty bit of work and because you haven’t ever addressed it you are too by association’.
- Status