Did you feed that back about the lipsticks? An inclusive brand, which hers claims to be, should have suggestions for all skin tones...
Oh it does. She's posted more than once about being recognised in Bluewater...
Did you feed that back about the lipsticks? An inclusive brand, which hers claims to be, should have suggestions for all skin tones...I was reminded the other day that fans is an abbreviation of fanatics and that rather rings true here.
I know we’re well past the consumer complaints but I bought a gold analysis and the lipsticks suggested for me were either discontinued or just plain didn’t work for black skin. At least they were upfront that they couldn’t provide advice for Afro hairstyling.
Oh it does. She's posted more than once about being recognised in Bluewater...I bet her ego loves being recognised!
Apparently she is the law with all these legal lettersOh it’s not Social Media influencers, it’s SBS they are above the law, did you not know?
Come on, own up, which genius kickstarted this?!Apologies if late to the party with this but Twitter are investigating a copyright breach on Susie’s account. From what I have read copyright breaches are all over the analyses too. And I see that someone called Carole is her PR person, and she’s from the Daily Mail. What does a Carole think about MHS??
OT but I saw someone on Twitter today call him Matt Wanksock and it gave me a chuckle.Anyone here in West Suffolk and can ask their MP Matt Hancock if there’s an exemption for social media influencers?
Was it the lady with the curly hair ??Was it not susie that thought she had a stalker before and can no longer drive on motorways as she had a panic on one thinking the stalker was following her?
What??? How do you know this amazing information! Its about time her business practices were looked atApologies if late to the party with this but Twitter are investigating a copyright breach on Susie’s account. From what I have read copyright breaches are all over the analyses too. And I see that someone called Carole is her PR person, and she’s from the Daily Mail. What does a Carole think about MHS??
The plot thickens....So who is Lee and where are they are now as MHS seems in control? Date just before patreon launched
That's the second review shes left as she wrote one for them in 2019 tooSo who is Lee and where are they are now as MHS seems in control? Date just before patreon launched
Carole Driver is the PR linkApologies if late to the party with this but Twitter are investigating a copyright breach on Susie’s account. From what I have read copyright breaches are all over the analyses too. And I see that someone called Carole is her PR person, and she’s from the Daily Mail. What does a Carole think about MHS??
The dictator thinks rules are what she decrees but the ASA will correct her... if they’ve been gifted to her or she has received a discount, she needs to hashtag them Hope she’s not going to get @TrendTonic into bother as TrendTonic seemed very genuine when she posted last weekOur #bekind dictator is now throwing sly digs out on her stories with her #neveranaffiliatelink #adfree hashtags about earrings
Do you know what, I don't mind an AD when I know its something someone genuinely uses, its people like her that get freebies and pretend they don't that jar my brainCarole Driver is the PR link
the ebooks had photos from major photo agencies uncredited - wonder if it’s been picked up?
The dictator thinks rules are what she decrees but the ASA will set her right... if they’ve been gifted to her or she has received a discount, she needs to hashtag them Hope she’s not going to get @TrendTonic into bother as TrendTonic seemed very genuine when she posted last week
I feel like this is more a dig at Emily who has a highlight on her page saying she was never allowed to accept gifts in her previous job but now she can and will be transparent about when she doesCarole Driver is the PR link
the ebooks had photos from major photo agencies uncredited - wonder if it’s been picked up?
The dictator thinks rules are what she decrees but the ASA will set her right... if they’ve been gifted to her or she has received a discount, she needs to hashtag them Hope she’s not going to get @TrendTonic into bother as TrendTonic seemed very genuine when she posted last week
I prefer to know if it’s an ad. In a magazine or newspaper it’s easier to differentiate but in social media the casualisation of freebies and influencers makes it difficult to tell what’s an honest opinion and what’s sponsored. I take most things with a bucket of salt but sometimes I get caught. Case in point, Styled by Susie.Do you know what, I don't mind an AD when I know its something someone genuinely uses, its people like her that get freebies and pretend they don't that jar my brain
if it’s a dig at Emily, and Susie has been accepting gifts without disclosing them, then it becomes less of a dig at Emily and more of silliness on Susies part.I feel like this is more a dig at Emily who has a highlight on her page saying she was never allowed to accept gifts in her previous job but now she can and will be transparent about when she does
Yup.....not that she will ever admit to anything like.....I prefer to know if it’s an ad. In a magazine or newspaper it’s easier to differentiate but in social media the casualisation of freebies and influencers makes it difficult to tell what’s an honest opinion and what’s sponsored. I take most things with a bucket of salt but sometimes I get caught. Case in point, Styled by Susie.
if it’s a dig at Emily, and Susie has been accepting gifts without disclosing them, then it becomes less of a dig at Emily and more of silliness on Susies part.
It wouldn't surprise me if it is a dig because they are jealous clearly! XI prefer to know if it’s an ad. In a magazine or newspaper it’s easier to differentiate but in social media the casualisation of freebies and influencers makes it difficult to tell what’s an honest opinion and what’s sponsored. I take most things with a bucket of salt but sometimes I get caught. Case in point, Styled by Susie.
if it’s a dig at Emily, and Susie has been accepting gifts without disclosing them, then it becomes less of a dig at Emily and more of silliness on Susies part.
What do you mean? Can you explain it for a simpletonApologies if late to the party with this but Twitter are investigating a copyright breach on Susie’s account. From what I have read copyright breaches are all over the analyses too. And I see that someone called Carole is her PR person, and she’s from the Daily Mail. What does a Carole think about MHS??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?