I know some of you read the comment replies, don't bother anymore, they are taken over by an annoying comment bot. 
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
the wet wipes tiktok ad was really unspeakably bad .
.S and G missed an editing opportunity for their wet wipes video- they should've used the 70's hit song "Afternoon Delight"
Rubbing sticks and stones together makes the sparks ignite and the thought of loving you is getting so exciting! 
Rubbing sticks and stones together makes the sparks ignite and the thought of loving you is getting so exciting! That adult wet wipe spot, as so many have said, is just so gross. So instead of bathing, she just wipes him down? And then it turns to sex? Really? And the size difference between them is so absurd, like even her head is huge compared to his, it's bizarre.
It never stops being absurd that they pretend they have sex when it's impossible for so many reasons. Just trying would literally be life threatening to him. 1 little slip up and she would crush his ribcage like an egg. It would be dangerous even with a non massive amazonian woman but it's so obviously impossible with his legs and ribs totally covering his crotch.
Absurd is truly is the best word to describe this display. It's beyond ridiculous. I always notice how at least 4-5 of his insectoid limbs can fit into hers. She also looks like a big lumbering creep hovering over him, pretending she's turned on by his crumpled, immobile, and no doubt still smelly body. Hannah is one deranged chick, even to act this out.
Plus I know this is tmi I doubt he can sustain a boner for more than two seconds too
Even if he was abled bodied he wouldn’t get many girls he’s not exactly good looking he’s geeky not even in the cool way and he acts like a complete jerk … it’s not cause he’s disabled people don’t want him it’s cause of how he acts a small percentage can see right through his nice guy act he’s just a jerk
Spot on - it's pathetic when their fans say it's easy to see why Hannah married him because he's soO hAnDsOme. That's a bloody flat out lie and these people are sick, trying to get virtue signalling brownie points by buttering him up. No one would swoon over him even if he were able bodied, especially the "blonde babes" he pretends to effortlessly reel in.
I bet all of the girls who swoon over Shane and his "handsomeness" swipe left and reject any men under 6 feet tall let alone disabled men on dating apps. Virtue signaling all the way for S and G's fans!
Right, even able bodied, he is not attractive, and not as clever as he thinks he is. Does he write anything else? Fiction, non fiction, adventure, fantasy, mystery? Nope, just dumb "blogs" about his life, which isn't exciting or interesting. It's such an act, a very carefully crafted act.
Oh god. I'm so sorry for saying this but that actually turned my stomach a little. Not because he isn't worthy of love, it's because the size and capacity disparity makes it look like he is some kind of unwilling and ill fitted sex doll rather than a willing and engaged partner. Even with the kiss, he doesn't seem to have the muscle in his mouth and tongue to recipritate a passionate kiss. Kissing him must be akin to kissing a well lubricated sex doll, absolutely no way that is enjoyable. I'm all for equality but there is no feckin way Hannah doesn't have a big old fetishism for adult babies.
In an unrelated, but kind of losely related topic...
I work in criminal justice. Some of the clients I work with unfortunately have been convicted of sex related crimes. My job is to do with rehabilitation, so I get access to all the client court records and social work reports, buts it's essentially up to me how much I look into these. Sometimes it's easier not to read up too much on someone's crimes because I need to spend quite a lot of time making small talk and chit chat while I build a relationship with them. The other day I was working with a client who was convicted of downloading a considerable amount of images of child abuse, some of which was of the highest category, which I won't describe here as its too distressing. The odd thing with this client was he was so forthcoming in his social work interviews. Long story short he disclose in these reports that he has a strong interest in adult baby play, including wearing nappies, which he indicated was the route of his attraction to young children. I can put most of the the graphic things out of my head when I speak to clients like this, but this man who kind of looked like an oversized adult baby himself disclosing this was one of the most distracting things I have ever encountered in work. I just kept getting these horrific images of him dressed up, which I know is so unprofessional, but that's why I sometimes try and keep some distance from the details! It's insane though, this man was earning more thank £80,000 a year in the merchant navy and was in a long term, stable same sex relationship and has thrown it all away all for the sake of download over 2000 images of sexual abuse. Very, very polite and cordial with his manner too. It's strange in this field of work because you really see things like this from literally all walks of life, but it's more common from people with chaotic lifestyles or traumatic backgrounds.
I totally agree that he just doesn't have the capacity for a full sexual relationship. This is fine as I've said before, the problem is they are lying about it. As said above, even kissing him can't be pleasant. Even if I were attracted to someone and in a relationship the way we were together would change depending on the circumstances. If we couldn't have sex or kiss or the like then you express love in other ways. There is nothong wrong with this, every situation and couple.is different. You don't pretend to the world you have a full active sex life when you clearly don't. I feel for other disabled people who watch Shane and feel sorry or cheated or a failure since they don't have the same experience that Shane claims he is having. If you can barely swallow, move your head or tongue or control saliva then you don't have full on pashs. It just won't be nice. It isn't something you can do. Kisses on the cheek or head or Hannah saying how she caresses his face and strokes his hair etc etc would be a much honest account. Pretending she jumps on his foot long snake and rides him is ridiculous.
Honestly you have just expressed so well all the issues I have with this relationship. Of course, there are many types of partnerships out there and even the ones that don't involve passionate sexual intimacy are totally valid. I've seen a sexual couples, and couples that function in a 'post sex' relationship where they have either moved on from their physical intimacy, or illness has taken that part of their life from them, and I genuinely wouldn't want to invalidate any of those experiences.
However you hit the nail on the head so we'll when you talk of the ingenuity of what they parade around. My biggest issue with them is that they are creating a fallacy, presenting an image of a relationship that it total out of the grasp of so many people with life limiting or altering disabilities. And so often these are the poor souls that I see who absolutely lap up their content, wondering why their lives don't live up to the fallacy that s&g present. And I honestly find it morally repugnant that these two make a fortune out of these poor souls. And then on top of it they have the audacity to say that they are disability advocates, when they are single handedly one of the biggest sources of insecurity in these peoples lives. It digusts me.
Thank you for your sad emoji. I actually wanted to cry after watching it. It is fetish porn; here we go - again - having shots of Shane's naked body shoved in our faces and being called judgmental for not wanting to see it. There is something so predatory about it all. He is so tiny and helpless. Anything could be done to him and he would be powerless to stop it.the wet wipes tiktok ad was really unspeakably bad
And caregiving should not be sexualized. It is like Shane is some kind of prop/toy/pet for other people's sick needs. All hidden under the "We're just advocating for the disabled and promoting the normalcy of inter-abled relationships" mantra.
And how many sickos will get ideas from watching their videos and then take advantage of a person left in their care because S&G have made it look acceptable. And respectable, too! See how many speaking engagements they get and how many boards they're on? It's all okay-dokey, folks!
Sorry guys.....I can't even laugh about them anymore.
Skimming through their viewer questions video, someone reportedly asked if Shane is able to straighten his legs or are they always bent at the knee? Here is their bizarre answer. The captioning software has a terrible time deciphering what Shane says. My best guess at what he was saying is in parentheses.
Shane: "No, they don't really stray in (straighten). They're shooting (straightening) a little bit. My lives (legs) don't really straighten very far. That's like my fault from not doing enough physical therapy over the years, but I prioritize (prioritized) other things that took up my time."
Hannah: "Yeah, and really straightening your knees is not.... "
Shane: "... does it (doesn't) really negatively affect my life at all."
Hannah: "I'm really happy (with) that much."
WTH forced him to "prioritize" more than trying to flex and strengthen what little bit of muscle he has? Maybe if he'd prioritized his health he wouldn't look like Quasimodo with flippers. MAYBE he could have developed enough manual dexterity and flexibility so he could do something more than be Hannah's posable Ken doll.
I know that's not a nice thing to say, but he's said worse about himself AND Hannah. I would never say something like that about someone JUST because he's disabled. I say it because, all disability aside, he's a pompous ass who, contrary to what he wants everyone to think, isn't "Love Sausage." (ht: "The Boys")
Shane: "No, they don't really stray in (straighten). They're shooting (straightening) a little bit. My lives (legs) don't really straighten very far. That's like my fault from not doing enough physical therapy over the years, but I prioritize (prioritized) other things that took up my time."
Hannah: "Yeah, and really straightening your knees is not.... "
Shane: "... does it (doesn't) really negatively affect my life at all."
Hannah: "I'm really happy (with) that much."
WTH forced him to "prioritize" more than trying to flex and strengthen what little bit of muscle he has? Maybe if he'd prioritized his health he wouldn't look like Quasimodo with flippers. MAYBE he could have developed enough manual dexterity and flexibility so he could do something more than be Hannah's posable Ken doll.
I know that's not a nice thing to say, but he's said worse about himself AND Hannah. I would never say something like that about someone JUST because he's disabled. I say it because, all disability aside, he's a pompous ass who, contrary to what he wants everyone to think, isn't "Love Sausage." (ht: "The Boys")
Why should society need "disability advocates" today? I mean, I'd never heard of such a "thing" until this pair of grifters rolled across my feed, prompting me to search for someplace, any place, that prompted intelligent discussion about what to me seemed like a lot of "much ado about nothing" with all the fawning sycophants (probably bots) their videos attract. And so, I found y'all! My people!
I don't remember being "taught" the idea that whenever you encounter someone with a disability, you treat them as you would any other person. One of my jobs for several years included changing out the batteries in electric wheelchairs, so I often dealt with folks with disabilities requiring they use wheelchairs. (A pair of the most common size 12-volt SLA wheelchair batteries each weigh in the 25-35-pound range.) I always addressed the person in the wheelchair, just like I would any able-bodied person. To me this is just common courtesy and common sense, both of which seem to be sorely lacking these days.
One young man was particularly memorable. He was probably in his mid-20s to mid-30s. I'm not good at estimating people's age. He appeared to have some sort of dwarfism, or looking back now that I'm more familiar with SMA, he may have had SMA. He was tiny! He seemed to be of normal intelligence. His girlfriend/companion was with him, but as I would with any other customer, I addressed my questions and explanations to him. And they both responded very favorably, as if our encounter wasn't the norm. No doubt because of his small stature and thin, twisted limbs reminiscent of Shane's, he probably had to put up with a lot of the old "people think my girlfriend is my nurse" attitudes.
In that respect I do think people like that likely grate on Shane (and H's) nerves, but Shane really doesn't exert much effort dispelling the idea that he's a kid. He repeatedly refers to himself as a "boy." He has about as mature a sense of humor as a horny 13-year-old boy, so he could help himself to some degree. Enough already of the fluttering eyebrows over spreads of food there's no way he can eat!
My upbringing was conservative and not all "touchy-feely"... if that even makes sense. (I still am conservative. I detest "cancel culture" and SJWs taking offense at pretty much everything. The whole "preferred pronouns" thing makes me stabby!) I don't remember ever experiencing some big epiphany. I just intuitively realized from an early age that just because someone has a disability and may use a wheelchair they are people first, so you deal with them as... people. It's simple. Put yourself in the other person's shoes and think how YOU'D want to be addressed. Since when do there have to be "disability advocates" to "teach" us how to be decent human beings? It sure ain't the heck from S&G!
I don't remember being "taught" the idea that whenever you encounter someone with a disability, you treat them as you would any other person. One of my jobs for several years included changing out the batteries in electric wheelchairs, so I often dealt with folks with disabilities requiring they use wheelchairs. (A pair of the most common size 12-volt SLA wheelchair batteries each weigh in the 25-35-pound range.) I always addressed the person in the wheelchair, just like I would any able-bodied person. To me this is just common courtesy and common sense, both of which seem to be sorely lacking these days.
One young man was particularly memorable. He was probably in his mid-20s to mid-30s. I'm not good at estimating people's age. He appeared to have some sort of dwarfism, or looking back now that I'm more familiar with SMA, he may have had SMA. He was tiny! He seemed to be of normal intelligence. His girlfriend/companion was with him, but as I would with any other customer, I addressed my questions and explanations to him. And they both responded very favorably, as if our encounter wasn't the norm. No doubt because of his small stature and thin, twisted limbs reminiscent of Shane's, he probably had to put up with a lot of the old "people think my girlfriend is my nurse" attitudes.
In that respect I do think people like that likely grate on Shane (and H's) nerves, but Shane really doesn't exert much effort dispelling the idea that he's a kid. He repeatedly refers to himself as a "boy." He has about as mature a sense of humor as a horny 13-year-old boy, so he could help himself to some degree. Enough already of the fluttering eyebrows over spreads of food there's no way he can eat!
My upbringing was conservative and not all "touchy-feely"... if that even makes sense. (I still am conservative. I detest "cancel culture" and SJWs taking offense at pretty much everything. The whole "preferred pronouns" thing makes me stabby!) I don't remember ever experiencing some big epiphany. I just intuitively realized from an early age that just because someone has a disability and may use a wheelchair they are people first, so you deal with them as... people. It's simple. Put yourself in the other person's shoes and think how YOU'D want to be addressed. Since when do there have to be "disability advocates" to "teach" us how to be decent human beings? It sure ain't the heck from S&G!
Last edited:
Apologies, I’m repeating myself but only because squirmy and grubs are repeating their old material too.
Two recent videos. In one they are both asked about hoarding keepsakes or items, things that they just cant part with. Shane says he doesn’t really have anything like that (which makes sense I guess, other than his chair and his laptop what else does he actually physically ‘use’? ) but does say that he has a really bad habit of opening snacks, not finishing them and putting them back in the cupboard for later despite the fact that he doesn’t like eating leftovers. Yet again its in the first person ‘I open the snack’, ‘I put them back in the cupboard’ etc etc – always in the first person, and never acknowledging that it’s not actually him who performs these activities.
I’m actually wondering now if Shane has maybe had counselling the in the past regarding his insecurity over his level of dependence, and it was maybe suggested to him that speaking in the first person like that is a technique to help him cope with the insecurities? I don’t know, perhaps I’m giving him too much credit, but as ever he is fully entrenched in the fallacy.
Second video of Shane gloating about a new knife that ‘he’ got for himself. He of course cant use the knife, so there’s this very odd segment where Hannah demonstrates the knife as he watches, commenting on how it has the ability to cut tomatoes so very thinly that he can eat them, because he cant chew tomatoes. Then it switches to an odd segment where they have cooked a cheese and tomato toastie (grilled cheese sandwich to you American’s out there) and he rejoices about how he can eat these ones because of the thing slices. Only thing is you can see the sandwich and it’s thick slices, and yet again they do that thing where they show a picture of Shane with food and say how much he has enjoyed eating the item, but never ever ever show him actually eating it. Again, deep into the fallacy. It’s been repeated so many times now that it’s insulting that they think they are fooling anyone. If he’s chowing down on these mammoth meals every day why do you make a hundred videos about food, but never ever ever show him even taking a bite? Once more I think the role play is a coping mechanism for him.
Utterly bizarre.
Two recent videos. In one they are both asked about hoarding keepsakes or items, things that they just cant part with. Shane says he doesn’t really have anything like that (which makes sense I guess, other than his chair and his laptop what else does he actually physically ‘use’? ) but does say that he has a really bad habit of opening snacks, not finishing them and putting them back in the cupboard for later despite the fact that he doesn’t like eating leftovers. Yet again its in the first person ‘I open the snack’, ‘I put them back in the cupboard’ etc etc – always in the first person, and never acknowledging that it’s not actually him who performs these activities.
I’m actually wondering now if Shane has maybe had counselling the in the past regarding his insecurity over his level of dependence, and it was maybe suggested to him that speaking in the first person like that is a technique to help him cope with the insecurities? I don’t know, perhaps I’m giving him too much credit, but as ever he is fully entrenched in the fallacy.
Second video of Shane gloating about a new knife that ‘he’ got for himself. He of course cant use the knife, so there’s this very odd segment where Hannah demonstrates the knife as he watches, commenting on how it has the ability to cut tomatoes so very thinly that he can eat them, because he cant chew tomatoes. Then it switches to an odd segment where they have cooked a cheese and tomato toastie (grilled cheese sandwich to you American’s out there) and he rejoices about how he can eat these ones because of the thing slices. Only thing is you can see the sandwich and it’s thick slices, and yet again they do that thing where they show a picture of Shane with food and say how much he has enjoyed eating the item, but never ever ever show him actually eating it. Again, deep into the fallacy. It’s been repeated so many times now that it’s insulting that they think they are fooling anyone. If he’s chowing down on these mammoth meals every day why do you make a hundred videos about food, but never ever ever show him even taking a bite? Once more I think the role play is a coping mechanism for him.
Utterly bizarre.
Those last two videos were pointless and full of absurdities/holes.
I wondered about why the tomatoes were so thick in that sandwich, too, when he can only consume paper thin slivers of them. Hannah was obviously stuffing her face with the sandwich they presented, while his bread, cheese and tomato smoothie waited for him offscreen.
Buying himself a knife and his chip story were both absolutely ridiculous.
Hannah is a damn dunce - I wouldn't trust her taking measurements. Even though 5'1" is still small, he definitely looks more like a wee 4'7". He is not 5'1".
What an arrogant ass he is, and a stupid one to boot. For someone with his condition, what could possibly be more important than investing time and effort into maximizing his strength, flexibility and mobility? I'm sure it would be difficult and painful at first (a relative has CP, and I saw it was hard on her sometimes), but wouldn't it be worth it? The way he haughtily stated he had other things to focus on - like what, his lame blogging? Tagging along with and being the resident clown for his brother and his brother's friends? The self negligence is a dangerous message to send others with the same disease. He wouldn't know if his permanently bent knees has a negative impact because he's never straightened them. Pretending he's a stallion in bed with his baby carrot AND bent legs, too...smdh.
Speaking of his baby carrot, he claimed that condom catheters are too tight for him
Just stop it with all the fiction already.
I wondered about why the tomatoes were so thick in that sandwich, too, when he can only consume paper thin slivers of them. Hannah was obviously stuffing her face with the sandwich they presented, while his bread, cheese and tomato smoothie waited for him offscreen.
Buying himself a knife and his chip story were both absolutely ridiculous.
Hannah is a damn dunce - I wouldn't trust her taking measurements. Even though 5'1" is still small, he definitely looks more like a wee 4'7". He is not 5'1".
What an arrogant ass he is, and a stupid one to boot. For someone with his condition, what could possibly be more important than investing time and effort into maximizing his strength, flexibility and mobility? I'm sure it would be difficult and painful at first (a relative has CP, and I saw it was hard on her sometimes), but wouldn't it be worth it? The way he haughtily stated he had other things to focus on - like what, his lame blogging? Tagging along with and being the resident clown for his brother and his brother's friends? The self negligence is a dangerous message to send others with the same disease. He wouldn't know if his permanently bent knees has a negative impact because he's never straightened them. Pretending he's a stallion in bed with his baby carrot AND bent legs, too...smdh.
Speaking of his baby carrot, he claimed that condom catheters are too tight for him
Just stop it with all the fiction already.I don't understand the need for "disability advocates" either- especially in 2022 when if you pat a coworker on the back for a good job or mess up someone's complex preferred pronouns, you could be "cancelled" in a heartbeat and fired. I think what particularly gets on my nerves is that Shane doesn't want to be treated as an equal, he wants to be coddled and treated as if he is better than everyone else and should be congratulated simply for existing. If Shane truly were charitable. he wouldn't charge hefty sums for underfunded public schools to hear him talk about his disability- in fact, he'd do them out of the kindness of his heart for free or a reduced flat rate in wanting to spread a message of acceptance. Shane reminds me of washed-up, long forgotten celebrities on a website called "Cameo" who have the audacity to charge upwards of $800 to thousands of dollars to video record a 30 second personalized video message to a fan. I believe in treating others as I would like to be treated, and I think true acceptance of disabled people is treating them as any other person: with respect, kindness when interacted with and forgoing any fanfare over who they are or what makes them different from an able-bodied person.
I completely agree with you in terms of your political beliefs and your stance on "advocates", SJW's and preferred pronouns- it's a time of speech policing, snowflakes, fragile egos and uncertainty. A time where anti-drug ad campaigns are now defunct, and children are vaping or scoring drugs and adults are overdosing and dying at an all-time high. A time where morally bankrupt, talentless whores like Cardi B or Miley Cyrus make hundreds of millions and schoolteachers have to buy their own school supplies for a class and take on two or three part time jobs to make ends meet- I could go on and on, but I'll leave the rest of this rant in my head haha. I think the problem today is people are appropriating the word "advocate" to seem like they're creating a movement and helping others, when in reality they're profoundly insecure attention seeking people that solely want to further their own recognition and social media 15 minutes of fame.
- Status