To those who doubt that David Jason is a paedophile, consider whether you would have believed before that Jimmy Saville was removing the glass eyes from dead bodies and having them made into rings, and using his influence to gain access to children in hospitals. Or if ‘loveable’ Rolf Harris was a paedophile....
anything is possible.
My doubt is more about why on Earth it would not only be covered up, but also why the BBC would continue to work with him.
If the police have a file on him, that any old fella in the Met has been able to have a look at then why the f**k haven't they arrested him, charged him and convicted him?
As other people have spoken about this incident where his house sitters used his home for dodgy things, I think it's more likely that there was a file which identified his home and they were able to rule his involvement out.
If anyone is able to explain how and why DJ has been able to suppress legal action and also continue to be employed, I would love to hear from them.