When considering risks the defendant should have been aware of and the steps they ought to have taken and circumstances they ought to have foreseen, and considering what a reasonable person in those circumstances would have done.
By circumstance that also includes personal characteristics, for example, if it comes to it, your interpretation of FS's intelligence.
That's very clear then re: the earlier debate we had about whether causing or allowing is solely on what a reasonable person ought to know. They can find not guilty if they feel the IQ was a significant contributing factor.
