March 2022 apparentlyYes! Onto bigger and better things! Speaking of, I wonder when Sali’s next book will be released now. It’s going to be a scream.
No clue, to be honest! I thought Hadley Freeman was but could be wrongSurely those columnists aren't staffers?
Jess has been doing that column over ten, 15 years I wouldn’t be surprised if she was employed, Sali too as they started so long ago when it was an ethical employer. The Graun was practically a public sector employer. Even moving up to Kings Cross hasn’t shaken their desire to be like one of the many Charity organizations they used to be surrounded and infatuated by.Surely those columnists aren't staffers?
A giant photo of Sali with another, tiny one, of her that was taken years ago but no room for a picture of the product or range??Jeez, that Guardian byline picture of her with those watery, pink eyes.
I know what you’re thinking, because I thought it too: a “tinted serum” won’t touch the sides on anyone old enough to be twice-jabbed and in possession of a single speck of sun damage.
There is in the paper.A giant photo of Sali with another, tiny one, of her that was taken years ago but no room for a picture of the product or range??
"Consider my review a rave".Link so clicks go via Tattle. I can’t bear giving the woman a click otherwise.
The best bargain tinted serums with a luxury foundation feel | Sali Hughes
After 18 months in trainers and elasticated waists, we want easy-to-use beauty products, toowww.theguardian.com
View attachment 768774
Consider my review an AD, more like it.
This is so flipping dodgy.Same product is reviewed in The Times today too. Also, would you believe, a rave review. L'Oréal obviously on a charm offensive.
At least The Times article writes about 4 other serum foundations as well. And has readers' comments to make the whole thing more interesting.Same product is reviewed in The Times today too. Also, would you believe, a rave review. L'Oréal obviously on a charm offensive.
No Sali, if you knew what we were thinking it would be "Sali is a tool"'I know what you’re thinking, because I thought it too: a “tinted serum” won’t touch the sides on anyone old enough to be twice-jabbed and in possession of a single speck of sun damage.'
WTF ist this patronizing crap anyway. Must we hide our skins under thick make-up to look "less shit"?
True. Both headlines promise a buffet selection to choose from but only The Times' beauty ed offers a selection alongside the #AD while The Guardian's just offers the equivalent of comped chipolatas.At least The Times article writes about 4 other serum foundations as well. And has readers' comments to make the whole thing more interesting.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?