Argh, nightmare! I was typing in a hurry and didn’t mean to sound pompous, btw.
Many people who are not on the government’s ‘extremely vulnerable’ list, but who still need to be self-isolating due to age or illness, are finding it very hard or impossible to get deliveries.I don’t agree about the supermarket deliveries. They already prioritise the vulnerable when allocating slots, so I don’t have an issue with anybody getting their groceries delivered. A lot of people in city centres don’t have a reasonably-sized supermarket near them, for one thing. Also, I think it’s understandable to be scared or wary of going into one even if you do.
They are, but in many of those cases, you or me holding back from booking a slot wouldn’t actually help anyway. I think they should widen the definition of vulnerable to capture those people if needed, and extend the priority slots to them. I live in an urban area where the local Co-op is closed indefinitely, as is the corner shop. I have nowhere else to buy groceries without walking a couple of miles each way, presumably wearing a rucksack to carry everything. It is possible, for sure, but there’s a reason I shop online in the first place. I have no idea what Sali’s personal circs are (deep research notwithstanding ), but if she’s always shopped online as I have, I get it and don’t see an issue with it.Many people who are not on the government’s ‘extremely vulnerable’ list, but who still need to be self-isolating due to age or illness, are finding it very hard or impossible to get deliveries.
They sure could use a week dilute.Those tweets have NOT aged well, good grief
Oh dear. So does writing about all those things she cites for The Pool and elsewhere mean she should acknowledge she has sold her private life by her own criteria? I imagine The Pool paid her for those think pieces. She chose to write about her sex life. I can't imagine anybody here would chose to speculate about it otherwise. She seems to have a problem with people remembering stuff she wrote. Remembering things = trolling.View attachment 112718View attachment 112719View attachment 112720
Oldies but goodies. I wonder if SH's thinking has evolved since then. Those comments were post Leveson and I found them astonishing at the time which is why I remembered them.
I don't really care about hypocrisy, we're all hypocrites in some way or another. It's the arrogance of rather mediocre thinkers setting themselves up as moral arbiters and guides to modern life and thinking themselves superior.
The certainty with which SH imbues her every statement whether it's about an acid toner or the guilt of Christopher Jefferies is one of the things that realy grates for me.
Much like dressing for Leonard.....Is it just me or does maintenance shag suggest that sex is just something women do to keep man happy? Lie back and think of England for the sake of your relationship? Such an outdated way of thinking
And hereShe also mentioned the maintenance shag on some podcast a couple of years ago. This one.
View attachment 112771
Never misses an opportunity. And you're so right about the listso the impartial observer just got the whole Sali liefest thrown at her.
Actually I don’t imagine CH would give a flying f what people say on here or wherever about her.I don’t think it’s about just submitting to it, just more like making the effort to have some time alone together when you’re not just parents, or whatever. Anyway, I assume she is rueing the day now, because that phrase will probably find its way into her flipping obituary*.
(*Not a death threat, just an expression. Chill your tits, Hughes, as Hirons would say.)
Yup that seems to be it really.She really is laughable.
She can write about anything and anyone but if anyone else writes or comments about those articles or her comments in a less than favourable light .... we’re trolls ???
Okay then Sali