Well, it’s resulted in a contender for the next thread title...
... but no blue tickers.
... but no blue tickers.
Sali Hughes #14 Went to the pub during a pandemic, for real! Never mind, feel as you feel
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Sali Hughes Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
More of a slapdash splotch of foundation than a shining beacon of light.
if Tattle was full of people spouting that sort of nauseating cack Sali would be donating free luxury goods to us all. That’s one overinflated, fragile ego she has. A trait often found in a complete fraud.
Sali said that Tattle didn't stop, they just doubled down. No, what actually happened was that your Friday rant sent many more people here.
I'm still confused about Sali claiming she DNGAF about anyone else's makeup or clothes, or more importantly that she could care less what anyone thinks about her clothes or makeup.
Why then does she get really snippy if anyone comments on her clothes or makeup rather than just ignoring the comment? Is this a case of protesting too much?
Why then does she get really snippy if anyone comments on her clothes or makeup rather than just ignoring the comment? Is this a case of protesting too much?
What foundation did she say she is wearing? It looks like a mask. It’s really not flattering at all
I love the EL foundation , it’s gorgeous.
She does look overly made up in that photo and without a ring light she looks less glowy .
She does look overly made up in that photo and without a ring light she looks less glowy .
I just looked at the recent tweets about it. Apparently we are jealous? I can say hand on heart I am not jealous 
Someone has also said "who has the time".. similar to having time for Twitter and Facebook groups and forums? Makes zero sense.
Someone has also said "who has the time".. similar to having time for Twitter and Facebook groups and forums? Makes zero sense.This. It's when she (or anyone) goes into 'MY years of experience with make up and skincare make me an expert, but YOURS...well...let's just say, you go out without a bag over your head? Bless your heart...good for you'.
It's bullshit, it's just make-up. It's designed to be foolproof. You can't duck it up. Same with skincare. My favourite In the bathrooms were the ones with Claudia and Caitlin Moran, not because I particularly like either woman, but because their 'look'/application techniques made SH visibly squirm. You could see her hands twitching to get them to blend/use a neutral brown yada yada, to effectively trap them in the bland, boringly dictatorial grip of 'acceptable' make up.
Also 'who has the time' during a global pandemic where many people are at home without work to do / doing less work than usual / generally online a lot. Like we're foregoing more exciting adventures to be on Tattle.I just looked at the recent tweets about it. Apparently we are jealous? I can say hand on heart I am not jealous
Not the 'jealous' accusation again? Usually only applied by certain women to other women. How feminist. Are men ever accused of being jealous if they are critical of another man?
Re SH’s recent tweets: I would actually prefer some of this discussion to be in a private group. I’ve got no desire to witch publicly about, for example, anyone’s appearance.
But the discussion of her (lack of) professional ethics is different and should be discussed publicly. That includes her lack of disclosure of Botox and other procedures while promoting topical products and make up, her failure to follow ASA rules re product/service promotions, her refusal to engage with genuine and polite queries about any of this on her SM, her ‘stalking’ of critics, her history of bullying via twitter, and now some concerns about the apparent refocusing of Beauty Banks.
She could have addressed these issues genuinely and publicly herself at any time. Instead she dismisses *any* criticism as trolling, mental illness and jealous vitriol.
But the discussion of her (lack of) professional ethics is different and should be discussed publicly. That includes her lack of disclosure of Botox and other procedures while promoting topical products and make up, her failure to follow ASA rules re product/service promotions, her refusal to engage with genuine and polite queries about any of this on her SM, her ‘stalking’ of critics, her history of bullying via twitter, and now some concerns about the apparent refocusing of Beauty Banks.
She could have addressed these issues genuinely and publicly herself at any time. Instead she dismisses *any* criticism as trolling, mental illness and jealous vitriol.
Rolex as per.
Lockdown Beauty Special in the Guardian tomorrow.
She's got that freakily smooth, hard-boiled egg look there which characterised the late David Gest.
I noticed this too. Looks like she got a top-up just as things started to kick off. It takes two weeks to kick in properly.
Tbf I found in the comments about her outdoor Estée Lauder foundation useful, as it really did not look glowy in the slightest but quite matte, compared with for eg today's photo where I presume she is using a ring light. They looked like two different products.
I personally think when someone is using their own face as the advert, and actually as part of a paid campaign like here, then commentary on the product must be OK.
But yes I tend to agree with not being bitchy about anyone's appearance generally.
Last edited:
Same, the thread wasn’t really bitchy though. It was “what items of clothing can’t you stand?” Or something like that, someone said jumper dresses and Sali said they were her staple. I’m still laughing at getting blocked, looking back at my posts I’ve only posted eye rolly stuff and a recommendation for Aldi chocolate
get a thicker skin Sali love.- Status