It is really annoying me that she thinks she is above having to disclose her freebies. IT IS PART OF YOUR JOB.I suppose it is utterly futile to point out again that free #presssamples are still an #AD under the ASA rules.
I really am boring myself now.
Yes! Exactly. The rules clearly state it. She isn't going above and beyond in her duties and doing us all a favour - it is the bare minimum.It is really annoying me that she thinks she is above having to disclose her freebies. IT IS PART OF YOUR JOB.
IG flogger in proper labelling shockerBrace yourselves lads - I think her disclosure on the latest IG vid really is much better. She actually called it 'AD info' instead of just 'info' as well as identifying which samples were given to her so fair play for that.
However. I am still confused over the Estée Lauder foundation situation - in the EL specific video it says she is involved in an ongoing campaign for that product, she is wearing it in this latest vid yet states it is not part of that campaign. But surely the word 'campaign' implies not just a one off recommendation? I really am getting confused now myself.
I saw yesterday that Zoe Sugg has started tagging anything gifted to her #ad - gifted. She did a story saying she had to because of the ASA guidelines meant that anything gifted to a person with influence still counted as an ad, even if she wasn't obliged to post about it and wasn't paid. Totally the opposite to #gifted, #mostdefinitely100%notanAD that Sali does. I'm not sure what the difference is? Surely gifted things are ads?!It is really annoying me that she thinks she is above having to disclose her freebies. IT IS PART OF YOUR JOB.
It really is that simple.I saw yesterday that Zoe Sugg has started tagging anything gifted to her #ad - gifted. She did a story saying she had to because of the ASA guidelines meant that anything gifted to a person with influence still counted as an ad, even if she wasn't obliged to post about it and wasn't paid. Totally the opposite to #gifted, #mostdefinitely100%notanAD that Sali does. I'm not sure what the difference is? Surely gifted things are ads?!
Exactly. And why might they not like it? Because then their 'hey you stranger, my new bezzie mate! Come join the cool girls!' schtick looks as false as it is.The difficulty for the moaners is that in correctly labelling everything as an Ad (or, if they choose to be specific: Ad - paid, Ad - gifted, Ad - press trip, Ad - discount etc) it means firstly admitting to themselves their entire lives online are one giant ad - that they themselves are now the product to be consumed - it’s also laid bare for everyone to see and they can’t kid themselves or anyone it’s anything but the case. Tough times. If they don’t like it they shouldn’t have chosen to commoditise their personalities and their lives.
Oh good for her.I saw yesterday that Zoe Sugg has started tagging anything gifted to her #ad - gifted. She did a story saying she had to because of the ASA guidelines meant that anything gifted to a person with influence still counted as an ad, even if she wasn't obliged to post about it and wasn't paid. Totally the opposite to #gifted, #mostdefinitely100%notanAD that Sali does. I'm not sure what the difference is? Surely gifted things are ads?!
If it looks like a lip gloss and quacks like a lip gloss...She ought to thread carefully or she'll become a lip gloss girl. Mixing a lip balm/oil with lipstick, isn't that a, dare I say it (insert dramatic music), lip gloss?
This is dishonest. Plain and simple. Why trust a thing she bloody says if she can't be honest about that?A PSA. Who does she think she is, the gormless twat
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?