Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It's not just the free treatments that she receives, but the fact that these are 'benefits in kind' that she should be paying tax on. The fact that she is still trading on her "honest" approach is beyond laughable.
I thought extractions were a no no and the only way to keep pores clean is by regular exfoliation? I remember reading that from a skincare expert/ facialist, not sure who
I was curious after reading her article how much £11 in 1989 is worth now and it is £24. I know this probably isn't the point she is making, but the people now she cites charge 8× that. Including Sarah Chapman - the #presstreatment she quoted was around £200.
So, actually, what was the point she is making? People pay a HUGE amount more now for the same thing?
Plus I'd be mighty hacked off if after following expensive skin care routines SH and Hirons etc recommend, I went for a facial and they extracted masses of gunk from my pores and gave a better exfoliation than I could do myself with one of their favourite products. What is the bloody point of it all then if you have to trust yourself to a specialist?
'it seems better to pay experts to do something you can't do yourself for free'.
What? But all the things she says you can do - not free granted. More baffled than ever. (Aren't they all free for her btw?)
(Also if she or Lauren are reading I am not Kat Sing).
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.