Admittedly I haven't watched these guys in years but I've been seeing pictures on social media this week of them presenting Eduardo as a girl and people using gender neutral pronouns to refer to him(?) and I feel really really uneasy about it. Not because they're letting him express himself how he likes because I'd accommodate my future children if they were trans/NB but does Eduardo even know what a pronoun is? Has he expressed wishing he was a girl or does he just like playing with his sisters' toys and wearing their princess dresses? Because I think they're desperately pushing the 'trans/gender fluid, bullied child' narrative to exploit him like they've been exploiting their children for years. I don't think they have the critical thinking to understand that their child not conforming to gender norms and not only wanting to play with stereotypically boys toys doesn't mean that he's having a gender identity crisis at the age of 6/7 (can't remember his age ngl), the same way that Harry Styles wearing a dress on Vogue doesn't mean he wants to be a woman, it just means that bits of fabric or plastic don't have a gender. It all seems to be an attempt to fuel Jonathan's god complex that he's some woke father when in reality, he's just damaging his children, the same as when he praised Alessia for being friends with a little boy of colour when she probably didn't notice anything different about him. I don't check this thread often so I'm sure this has already been discussed at lengths but just wanted to see if anyone agrees. From what I've seen in recent years, I think Jonathan's exploitation of his children is horrific and Anna's passiveness and general lack of attachment to her children is equally awful. I know Stacey Dooley had to remain professional but I'd have been a hell of a lot more brutal than she was in that documentary. I don't know how they sleep at night knowing literal p*dophiles have threatened their children yet still plaster them on the internet every single day.