Wtaf have a word with yourself
Well if we're going to split hairs, there's no "innocent" ruling, only guilty or not guilty. So no, he's not "innocent".He's innocent then isnt he. If the evidence couldnt convince a court then that is literally that. You dont get convicted just because some one says so, or you have flimsy evidence.
Are you even British?? Have you never heard of Innocent until proven guilty? He doesnt have to prove anything, the burden of proof isnt on him its on the accuser! Jesus wept the nutters on this board are just a bunch of screaming harridans!!If no one's allowed to consider him guilty without a trial then similarly no one should proclaim his innocence.
you have to be a man.Are you even British?? Have you never heard of Innocent until proven guilty? He doesnt have to prove anything, the burden of proof isnt on him its on the accuser! Jesus wept the nutters on this board are just a bunch of screaming harridans!!
Yeah. Hiding in plain sight. Just like Saville.The story about 16 year old girl is similar to a lot of stories I have heard about including girls younger than that. I remember hearing a story about him luring 2 very young teenage fans who had turned up to book launch to his hotel room. Vile predator, I hope he gets his comeuppance. He obviously adopted this womaniser persona to provide a smokescreen to hide his very problematic behaviour.
Are you even British? It isn't even Innocent until proven guilty.Are you even British?? Have you never heard of Innocent until proven guilty? He doesnt have to prove anything, the burden of proof isnt on him its on the accuser! Jesus wept the nutters on this board are just a bunch of screaming harridans!!
I put something on twitter and the police came round to check on me. I was so surprised.A lot of these girls/ladies won’t have been believed and will have then just kept it to themselves.
Double assault.
There will be a lot more than have spoken out and I hope that the people who disbelieved them realise how it would have made them feel.
I once said something on social media that had happened to me that was true about a ‘national treasure’ and got shot down in flames.
I hope all predators famous or not get their due and that all victims get some peace.
you are a bleepAre you even British?? Have you never heard of Innocent until proven guilty? He doesnt have to prove anything, the burden of proof isnt on him its on the accuser! Jesus wept the nutters on this board are just a bunch of screaming harridans!!
The Lucy Letby trial had no hard evidence, it was basically all circumstantial. And yet she was (rightfully) found guilty. If enough women come forward it will become very hard for him to maintain his innocence.Are you even British?? Have you never heard of Innocent until proven guilty? He doesnt have to prove anything, the burden of proof isnt on him its on the accuser! Jesus wept the nutters on this board are just a bunch of screaming harridans!!
Oh wow. It usually takes me ages to spot you lot. Is there an ignore the goblin button?He's innocent then isnt he. If the evidence couldnt convince a court then that is literally that. You dont get convicted just because some one says so, or you have flimsy evidence.
Even if he was innocent, I don’t think you can excuse him having sex with a 16 year old at 32 when he’s a celebrity and has an obvious power imbalance. Just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s morally right.He's innocent then isnt he. If the evidence couldnt convince a court then that is literally that. You dont get convicted just because some one says so, or you have flimsy evidence.
yup hit their name & ignore option is thereOh wow. It usually takes me ages to spot you lot. Is there an ignore the goblin button?
Just press their name and you'll find the ignore button.Oh wow. It usually takes me ages to spot you lot. Is there an ignore the goblin button?
He isn’t gonna shag you mate. Not consensually anyways. Grow up.He's innocent then isnt he. If the evidence couldnt convince a court then that is literally that. You dont get convicted just because some one says so, or you have flimsy evidence.
Kirsty Gallagher's insta account seems to have taken down the story she shared from his account protesting his innocence.Just watching channel 4 news and clips of the doc. 100%agree with whoever here said he is appealing to his conspiracy theorists about rhe "mainstream media". I never found him funny but seeing clips of his "comedy" just ties in with what the women are claiming, hiding in plain sight is very much what it seems to be
He did loads of work for Channel 4 beyond Big Brother, Ponderland and a few other things that I can’t remember. I know his radio work mostly with the BBC but yeah, Channel 4 share the blame.I see BBC is being partially blamed for not acting but aren't Channel 4 more to blame? They helped launch his career and received complaints about him but continued to give him work it seems.