I never believe reviews as most of the time they are miles off the mark as I read a book once and the reviews were awful yet I really enjoyed the book. Plus I also love old editions of stuff as I always think they are much better than the newer version.Well yeah she's an idiot but my point is that the people in those reviews aren't far off.
And she might very well ruin her Folio Society version by scribbling in it but that doesn't make the edition a bad one.
Just another example of performative poverty from Roobles McdooblesI see we’re trying to make ourselves feel better by buying unnecessarily expensive editions of books we’ll never read
View attachment 2885885
the cheapest I could find it was over 60 € but sure, boo hoo about how £15 is sOoOoOo expensive for a book
edit: I’m by no means judging anyone for splurging on books, I’ve done my fair share, but Roobee 1) will grift anything and everything to avoid spending any of her own money and 2) never fails to mention how expensive something is when it suits her just to seem relatable, and this just shows how she can easily spend money whenever she feels like it.
An example of this was that she had this book and then decided to paint over the front cover because she didn't like it and this is how it ended up.
View attachment 2886106 View attachment 2886115
Well then it's JANUINELY shite, HONNASTLY.I was very curious what Rumbster had left for me, and there's just one video that is about as charming and nice as a dead worm. And I just watched that video of her unboxing that book, and am I hallucinating from my fever, or did she really say: "you know it's a nice book when it's packaged this well". Like, what the fuck does that mean?? and she says it so seriously too, nodding along solemnly
Well well, after week going MIA, now postingOh, goodie, another routine video full of performative fakery, with Ruby lie-squinting her way through pretentious lies and pretending to do shit she never does because she needed to shoehorn in the sponsor (which she also never uses).
Another bad AMMILEEE DICKINSON rip-off poem about random backyard foliage.
Another video of Ruby rambling yet again about the EPHAMMERAL NATURE OF THINGS because she desperately wants to be TWALVE AGANN.
Another video of Ruby dressing like a child and twirling AVVER-SYO-WHIMSICALLEEEEEEEEY in her desolate garden wasteland.
Another "routine" video full of wonky timescales.
Another video featuring undeclared ads and ED habits.
Another video of the wind mercilessly assaulting the mic and making her yammering inaudible.
Another video of Ruby trying to dislocate her spine with uncoordinated gymnastics to get out of going back to uni.
Another video of Ruby moaning about how, as a society, "WE" keep doing things that only happen in Ruby's withered mind.
"'RYEETEEN' syeems loike the wrong waahrd to yeeze for this videeeyow."
Newsflash, Ruby: Most of those words sound pretty wrong with that fake accent.
"Flowers don't have a yeese."
Someone get science on the phone: The numerous medicinal properties of flowers and plants no longer apply; Ruby has decided that flowers don't have any use other than decorative.
"With something like potatoes...even if you only harvest them once...they're available all year round because we can get them from supermarkets. But with flowers, you can only GAT THAM and only access them and only smell them ONCE A YEAR."
Didn't she just say she wasn't doing anything and just staying home over the Easter break? Can she not ever tell the truth anymore? She has woven so many lies that she keeps getting caught in her own web!View attachment 2887961
I know that this is supposed to be a smile but this is my sleep paralysis demon. I don't actually understand why she looked at this photo and thought that this was a nice photo to post with this facial expression
She's not lying, necessarily, about the sequence: the second "day" is clearly earlier than the first. The flowers are less bloomed, she keeps referencing storm Kathleen (which was at the beginning of the month, not earlier this week as term starts today). She doesn't refer to it as the next day either, just "another day" in spring. Given she does just lie about timescales sometimes, the way she's presented this is probably more representative of her slapdash editing. She probably just didn't think about how it would look (and for a literature student? Womp womp.)My favorite part of this video was her saying she was sad to leave the garden/home because she was going to Oxford that day, and then showing the next day (if she's not lying about the time sequence, which is doubtful, but how many lies can you wrap yourself up in?) still at Bones Manor, and then also showing that evening, after dinner and her shower, obviously staying for yet another night. If it is true that she was meant to go home that first night, it's a clear indication that she is not happy at AXEFUD and wants to stay home longer. But if it's not true, it just goes to show that she's a giant liar and smudges her timelines (which is also not surprising and something WE know, but you'd think her avid watchers would have caught on by now). Either way, I don't know how she has an active audience to whom she constantly lies to. I will never trust her yapping and holier-than-thou lectures about anything she does, or anything she claims to know. Another insufferable watch. Thanks, Ruby, for nothing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?