It's not that it's easy to get into, it's that she applied to the least subscribed English course at the least subscribed historical college.
As I've said before, I am not suprised to get in. On paper, if I was a tutor of 15th century lit who had never heard of Ruby before, I would find her proposed area of study really intriguing and would want to read it. Because the concept of girlhood during that time period is virtually unexplored and, because of the mass book burnings during the time, completely uncategorised in known relevant text. I'd be thinking this is a student who is going to dig deep into the uncategorised archives and pull together something completely new for me to learn.
The tutor had no way to know that Ruby's interest in girlhood is strictly limited to the protrayal in children's fiction penned the years between 1890 and 1930. And her own pathological desire not to mature past age 12.
So here we are, 8 months later, and that same tute has now rejected multiple research questions from Ruby before practically having to spoonfeed her one. Which she may or may not currently be in the middle of starting again on.