Maybe I'm being snobbish but nothing screams 'I'm not a good writer' more than using "this essay will..." at university levelOh hi hello look what I found
I remembered she had talked about "having a paper published" and I wondered what became of it, so I googled "'Ruby Bones' essay".
edit: It's just as we always imagined - word salad cobbled together from way too many sources and not a single original thought to hold it together.
What bothers me most is she never tells us how "private" and "public" are being defined by her, the critics she's discussing, or how they may have been defined at the time of Dickinson writing. You can't present an argument like this without defining your terms. Your whole god damn argument rests on how you define these terms.
If I've picked it out correctly, I think her core idea is interesting; a binary, public OR private approach isn't useful in understanding Dickinson's poetry or her intentions. There's so much potential in this argument and it's all wasted
The fact this was published in any capacity is astounding to me.
Yooo lemme tell you, I went to Cambridge for my master's after getting a first in undergrad elsewhere and it humbled the ever living fuck out of me. And I didn't even have the same jumped up ego she does, I went in thinking applications to my course must've been sparse that year.I hope Ruby gets into Oxford. It has been mentioned here a couple of times before, but I want to repeat it: Though not guaranteed, there's at least the possibility of her learning some humility there. Which won't happen if she continues to live in her fantasy world at home. Or if she starts teaching but being left alone in the classroom with no honest feedback by experienced teachers.
Last edited: