From The Bookseller, the publishing industry's magazine.
View attachment 1126807
There's so much wrong with this.
Like people have said, the title is a terrible fit for the content. You're supposed to be able to read a title and get a feel for the tone and content of the book.
The blurb is clearly going for YA dark macademia contemporary mystery. The title is one you'd give to a third-rate Heathers knock-off dark comedy about a girl killing off her friends, or a simplistic Jacqueline Wilson-esque children's book where a 9 year old learns the importance of sharing their lunchtime snacks. Even then, it's a crappy, generic title.
Lottie Parton sounds like the most toffish Tory name. The only thing missing is a double-barreled surname and a picture on the cover of her hunting pheasant outside Waitrose while spitting on a homeless person. Way to make the main character instantly dislikable even before the blurb confirms that she's just Ruby.
Other red flags:
Ruby's agent apparently has this out on submission even though she's got Ruby writing the book essentially from scratch. "Revise and resubmit" requests are fairly common from publishers, but it doesn't sound like Ruby's even at that stage yet, so it's mind-boggling that she's out on submission with a novel that's evidently a complete mess and her agent has no apparent confidence in the current quality of.
The content of the book is completely out of Ruby's wheelhouse. Ruby can barely string together a coherent thought, let alone craft a compelling mystery about modern teenagers.
No doubt it'll be set at an all-girl's boarding school so that Ruby doesn't have to attempt to write a male character. There'll be no romance other than the unintentional undertones of Ruby’s self-insert protagonist obsessing over missing
Blakeney Clarke Binkleby Cooke. There'll only be paper thin stereotypes as characters because Ruby only associates with people like her and has utter disdain for anyone else, so she's incapable of writing a diverse, interesting or believable cast.
The 'Good Girl's Guide to Murder'/'Am I Normal Yet?' comparisons in the blurb raise major alarm bells. They're two of the only YA books she's
read pretended to read, and I would imagine she's applying her essay-writing technique to novel-writing: Read the synopsis of a few popular dark macademia-adjacent YA books and cobble together a paint-by-numbers plot full of YA clichés, archetypes and tropes with another thinly-veiled Ruby/Erimentha character as the lead and all romance removed. That's exactly what she did with Erimentha when she ripped off a bunch of middle-grade books.
That or this is absolutely going to be ghostwritten, with some writing house doing all the heavy lifting to craft a rote, easily-marketable, completely forgettable YA thriller from Ruby's incomprehensible notes about her productivity and ED habits and "facts" about Victorian letter-writing. I really hope that's not the case; I want the unfiltered mess of Ruby cringe for us to hate-read, not a generic YA book with nothing to laugh at. They've given Ruby a busywork rewrite task to keep her feeble mind occupied while the adults do the actual work, a bit like when parents give a child a small plastic construction playset to play with while the adults do home renovation, to trick the toddler into thinking they're helping.
Also, they market this as Ruby’s "debut", when Erimentally Deranged is right there. They clearly don't want anyone reading that.