It's kind of painful to see books recommended on this basis, but what can you do? I read (and reread) TSH before uni and adored it; the prose, topics, and unreliable narrator fit my tastes.loads of booktubers will say "this book has a dark academia vibe' nowadays! reading books such as song of achillies and the secret history fit into the vibe/aesthetic!
I'm going to go out on a limb here and deliberately not refresh my understanding of what the dark academia aesthetic allegedly is. Instead, I will recommend a couple books with the same darker, melancholic, introspective, scholarly or pseudoscholarly feel to them. Finally: Harry Potter doesn't belong to this aesthetic imho. Even if I don't truly believe in the "aesthetic," HP has no real place in it.
Elizabeth Hand, Waking the Moon - very well researched on the anthropological side
I'm a huge Nabokov fan and think most of his work can fit this "aesthetic." The same goes with Proust.
An atypical recommendation: Steven Millhauser, Edwin Mullhouse: The Life and Death of an American Writer 1943-1954, by Jeffrey Cartwright. I'm not sure if fits the aesthetic at all, heh, but it's good.
I have to cut this short - I'll make another post later with more and also include a bit more explanation.
Quick reply, have to pick up the dog from the vet, butOk. I will make a very bold statement. Whoever would say SoA has a Dark Academia vibe is actually perpetuating the purely superficial idea of „academia“. It‘s like claiming you are into classical music but are listening only to Pop - because some use classical motives or even melodies in the background.
SoA is basically fanfic exploring a same sex variation of an already written story. I am not bashing fanfic here. There is a reason it’s out there and many enjoy it. Some are very original and good. SoA is not. It’s pretty basic in its pursuit of telling „another version of the events“. Circe is a much much better attempt. But I cannot get over using a completely build world for your success. It severely lacks in originality. And that’s all the author has shown for now. That’s what distinguishes a good author from a brilliant one. It will make her money but it will not put her on the classics shelf. Which is fine, but I really don’t get how a pretty elitist subculture (the whole classic/Arts/history/philosophy/Oxbridge culture is feeding on elitist ideas. I don’t dislike it but I get why someone would) would think that’s part of the canon or a good example?
1. Nothing wrong with using a preexisting world!
2. I haven't read SoA so cannot comment (yet)
3. Circe is great, agreed!
4. If one has experience with Homer (at all - no need to be an expert), Derek Walcott's epic Omeros is marvelous. It's not for everyone, but even when I wasn't completely sure if I liked epic poetry, I loved this work.
Last edited: