Don't participate in either, but I think there is a middle ground. If spending thousands on a bag makes you feel special, you do you. All of these designer brands seem to be raising their price ranges, not because the quality is increasing or they are paying their staff more, but to become more exclusive. A lot of these designer brands also seem to be going down the fast fashion route, but at Chanel not Primark prices which encourages the resale market when things are out of trend. At the end of the day the lambs that are bred and slaughtered to make these accessories don't exactly care that you can claim it's more ethical because you are paying a premium for their skins.
There is lots of unethical moves in production, be it food, clothing or otherwise. No one cares that their chocolate has a high chance of being part of a supply chain that uses child slavery. If people want to purchase replica's then that is there choice, buying designer isn't exactly ethical at the end of the day either, and it does come down to people wanting to feel superior, to try and "catch out" those who can't or don't want to spend thousands. As said, neither is my choice, but it does all seem hypocritical people arguing over who is the most conscious consumer when it comes to animal skins and when a lot of these big houses are using labour from China which is hardly known for it's ethicacy
Actually, a lot of this is inaccurate.
First of all, lots of people DO care about what chocolate they consume, as per your example. I know I try my hardest to shop as ethically as possible in every avenue of my life, so to see someone try to compare their purchase of replica designer bags that they do not need with me possibly buying less than ethical meat because it’s all I can get hold of in a pinch, is somewhat laughable.
More importantly, however, is the fact that the dirty business of replicas is more complicated than some are suggesting. There is a lot of research that suggests that replicas fund organised crime, child trafficking and drug trade. It is far murkier than the average fashion brand.
There is also the fact that counterfeit productions do not pay their way fairly - so although pretty much ALL of the fashion industry, from high end to low end, are somewhat culpable in exploiting slave labour, they at least do pay their taxes and fair rents, pay for their design talent, at least attempt to source more ethical materials and off set carbon footprints. Many donate to charities, work on awareness campaigns etc. You can’t make the argument that they’re all as bad as each other, because it’s simply not true -
fashion is bad, counterfeit is worse.
I will never understand the concept that so many seem to think “well, I can’t shop perfectly ethically anywhere, so I’ll just give up and spend all my money on the worst possible stuff in terms of ethics”. It makes no sense to me. No, I’m not a perfect consumer, because that’s impossible - but I do my research and do my best to shop ethically, and I will continue to judge those who use cognitive dissonance and inaccurate arguments to defend the fact that ultimately, they care more about having a status bag than anything else.
I’m not on my high horse about having “proper” designer bags because I’m not that into them.