Lizzy 93
VIP Member
She prob told them to use that oneLeast they used a lush pic of Annie, can’t say the same for Lardy
Looking like a stuffed Turkey
- Notice
Looking like a stuffed Turkey
walking dead
Member
She’s at it again on Instagram. Copy of the message she’s sent Annie 🫣
RobinsHood
Well-known member
I can’t stand MM either so we agree on somethingOf course it’s ok lol. We all have our preferences. I don’t like Meghan Markle
MyRightTit
VIP Member
What happened to her as a child has nothing to do with how she behaved as an adult. There are records of when she told her mother & the church so it can be proved she was telling the truth. Why would she still be telling the same lie more than 25 years later?
Having zero or little empathy for a victim of child abuse, when it wasn’t their fault, is actually quite sickening. We all make mistakes as adults but as children we trust adults to protect us.
I’m actually appalled at some comments I’ve read online today about her. CSA is not acceptable to be trolled over, ever.
forgotmyacc
VIP Member
She's an absolute fool
Lizzy 93
VIP Member
Rebekah Vardy hits back after Wagatha Christie legal battle
The media personality, 41, took Coleen Rooney to High Court for libel - and lost - after Coleen claimed that Rebekah's social media account was leaking stories about her to the Press.
Has she actually done that wth
Lucymyers
VIP Member
MyRightTit
VIP Member
Rebekah is fronting a Channel 4 documentary exposing Jehovah’s Witnesses as she grew up in the cult. It’s on at 10pm on 16th May.
No matter your feelings on her I really hope the audience appreciates the programme as it deals with child sexual abuse & suicide.
No matter your feelings on her I really hope the audience appreciates the programme as it deals with child sexual abuse & suicide.
MyRightTit
VIP Member
I'm reading a lot of comments online about how awful Rebekah Vardy is and who can believe her, and people wishing it wasn't her fronting the documentary about the Jehovah's Witnesses covering up child abuse.
Regardless of whether you like Vardy or not, and regardless of whether she should be defined as a good/bad person because of what's she's known for, it shouldn't impact the sympathy we feel for any victim of abuse.
Vardy did experience sexual abuse as a child, and was shamed for it, and was stopped from getting support and stopped from talking to the police. This is horrendous and has been deeply traumatic for her.
She is deserving of our sympathy and of our support.
We don't get to choose victims we like, victims who are nice, and victims who fit the perfect picture we think of when we think of a victim. Sometimes victims of abuse are unkind, unlikeable, and are everything else any human can be. Because abuse can happen to anyone. And abuse can deeply impact how you interact with others for the rest of your life.
As human beings, everyone who has been abused should have the right to not be abused, to be believed when they ask for support, and to be supported. We should never supplement that with 'but only if you're nice and I like you'.
Regardless of whether you like Vardy or not, and regardless of whether she should be defined as a good/bad person because of what's she's known for, it shouldn't impact the sympathy we feel for any victim of abuse.
Vardy did experience sexual abuse as a child, and was shamed for it, and was stopped from getting support and stopped from talking to the police. This is horrendous and has been deeply traumatic for her.
She is deserving of our sympathy and of our support.
We don't get to choose victims we like, victims who are nice, and victims who fit the perfect picture we think of when we think of a victim. Sometimes victims of abuse are unkind, unlikeable, and are everything else any human can be. Because abuse can happen to anyone. And abuse can deeply impact how you interact with others for the rest of your life.
As human beings, everyone who has been abused should have the right to not be abused, to be believed when they ask for support, and to be supported. We should never supplement that with 'but only if you're nice and I like you'.
MyRightTit
VIP Member
Well when would have been an acceptable time to make it? Ten years from now? Children are being abused right now, they can’t wait until society deems it more timely. And who better to present it than someone who’s actually experienced it? And if everyone checked the facts, Channel 4 actually approached her to make it, she didn’t go looking for it. She’s damned if she does & damned if she doesn’t. No matter what her next move after the court case would’ve been it’d never be right for some people. I’m just glad she’s using her public voice now for something more helpful & constructive.
UsernameBlank
Chatty Member
Apologies, your correct
MyRightTit
VIP Member
No it doesn’t but the article & programme aren’t all about her. It’s aim is to expose the wrongdoings & cover ups of the Jehovah’s Witness religion in relation to child sexual abuse & shunning.
UsernameBlank
Chatty Member
If this is true she needs to go to the police
MyRightTit
VIP Member
I can’t understand peoples’ perspective at all actually. I’m not saying the court case wasn’t awful but no-one actually died! In the grand scheme of things, where countries are at war, people are starving & there's a cost of living crisis, it was a complete & utter waste of money. A war between two filthy rich women.
Vilifying her for having no empathy towards another WAG yet having no empathy towards her is despicable. If people can’t see past the mistakes of the host of the programme to see the actual criminal acts going on in a cult then the programme hasn’t done what it was supposed to do. And that’s sad for victims everywhere.
itsnotmereally
VIP Member
And a liar! Why would her and her agency make up a story about leaving her log-ins with a previous agency if it wasn’t anything to do with them. Pinocchio
In the article it says she does and the abuser plead guilty on the first day of the trial.