Thank you, that’s what I was thinking re the card if it got rusty in the water they might not be able to retrieve anything. A matter of working against time in that case.Here is some info about it, I know we shouldn't post to other threads but it'll answer your question... if you Google it, it should come up on a reddit thread and it's said there what can be done to recover data
Speaking of unbiased juries, I saw on court TV this morning they are still selecting the jury for the George floyd murder case. From what I remember they have selected 9 and still have to select 3.Thinking of people saying the speculation online may end up harming the SE case as it’s hard to get an unbiased jury after all that, would that also be an issue in the arrest this morning? As the case has been covered so extensively over the years, most people will already have an opinion. I suppose there must be some way to control for it in the higher profile cases.
Yeah, jury selection in big cases goes on for weeks in the USA.Speaking of unbiased juries, I saw on court TV this morning they are still selecting the jury for the George floyd murder case. From what I remember they have selected 9 and still have to select 3.
I'm kind of interested in that case but I probably won't follow it too closely because I find it pretty upsetting.
If you read Paul Britton's book, The Jigsaw Man, you'll understand that there were many reasons to suspect Colin Stagg. Not many people would get an erection when shown a crime scene photograph of a dead woman for example.There was a crimes that shook britain episode about Rachel Nickell on crime+investigation just now. I didn’t know much about the original case because I was really young at the time and never really looked into it. The way they implicated that poor man while Napper was still at large was terrible! I didn’t know that he has also raped and murdered another woman and her child. So many fuck ups there he could have been caught much sooner.
Been watching this on and off. They’ve dropped 2 today because they said they wouldn’t be able to remain impartial due to the civil lawsuit settlement.Speaking of unbiased juries, I saw on court TV this morning they are still selecting the jury for the George floyd murder case. From what I remember they have selected 9 and still have to select 3.
I'm kind of interested in that case but I probably won't follow it too closely because I find it pretty upsetting.
What did I tell you? Utterly fucking ridiculous that the settlement was announced during jury selection! I realise it's a pre trial settlement but surely it could have been kept quiet until after the trial?!Been watching this on and off. They’ve dropped 2 today because they said they wouldn’t be able to remain impartial due to the civil lawsuit settlement.
Who witnessed that though? They were seemingly just all stories that he made up to go along with the honey trap.Not many people would get an erection when shown a crime scene photograph of a dead woman for examlke.
It happened during a police interview IIRC. It's been a long time since I read the book but it was definitely when he was shown a crime scene photograph and that was not part of the honey trap.Who witnessed that though? They were seemingly just all stories that he made up to go along with the honey trap.
That’s a brilliant book. I believe he was who they based the TV character “Cracker” on?If you read Paul Britton's book, The Jigsaw Man, you'll understand that there were many reasons to suspect Colin Stagg. Not many people would get an erection when shown a crime scene photograph of a dead woman for example.
Paul Britton was the criminal psychologist who helped devise the "honey trap" at the suggestion of the police and became the fall guy for it all. It's a really interesting read.
He also covers the murders of Samantha & Jasmine Bisset along with the Green Chain rapes, all committed by Robert Napper, the man who murdered Rachel Nickell, which he was involved in as well.
Lots of other crimes are covered in the book too including the murder of James Bulger, Fred & Rose West, Colin Pitchfork (first man convicted using DNA) - all of which he worked with the police on.
I would really recommend it.
I think you might be mistaken, I tried to find if there’s been anything said that it was in police interview and there’s nothing online only that he admitted it to the undercover police woman. Excerpt from Paul Britton book says the same thing but perhaps it’s buried in the book somewhere. Quite vile if that’s true as were some of the things he was saying but I genuinely think he was a bit of a simpleton and couldn’t believe his luck when an attractive woman was interested in him. He said he thought she was nutter so he was a fool to go along with it but I’ve seen things like that before. Wasn’t there something on tv recently where the guy went along with the woman saying she wanted him to kill her husband? I think it was 24 hours in police custody maybe.It happened during a police interview IIRC. It's been a long time since I read the book but it was definitely when he was shown a crime scene photograph and that was not part of the honey trap.
You could well be right - as I said, it's been a long time since I read it. Maybe he told her that he got an erection when shown the photograph and I've just got confused. It's still a very odd thing to make up though.I think you might be mistaken, I tried to find if there’s been anything said that it was in police interview and there’s nothing online only that he admitted it to the undercover police woman. Excerpt from Paul Britton book says the same thing but perhaps it’s buried in the book somewhere. Quite vile if that’s true as were some of the things he was saying but I genuinely think he was a bit of a simpleton and couldn’t believe his luck when an attractive woman was interested in him. He said he thought she was nutter so he was a fool to go along with it but I’ve seen things like that before. Wasn’t there something on tv recently where the guy went along with the woman saying she wanted him to kill her husband? I think it was 24 hours in police custody maybe.
Yes, allegedly. There's a follow up called Picking Up The Pieces, that focuses more on his clinical work but does cover some further crimes including the still unsolved murder of Janet Brown.That’s a brilliant book. I believe he was who they based the TV character “Cracker” on?
Always found the jury selection process in America weird tbh though I'm only really familiar with it through TV.Been watching this on and off. They’ve dropped 2 today because they said they wouldn’t be able to remain impartial due to the civil lawsuit settlement.
Essex police have released a statement saying that significant information came to light off the back of the documentary last year and also due to the enhanced reward that had been offered. They are now going to be re-interviewing everyone else who was there that night and they do sound pretty certain that they will bring the perpetrator(s) to justice at long last.Astounded about the Stuart Lubbock news. Really hope there can be answers after all this time and someone held responsible for the attack and murder of Stuart.
I just watched Kendall's video on this and I came out not having much doubt that she was genuinely kidnapped. There are definitely some uncertainties but the fact she's been totally silent ever since makes me think it was all real and not faked...Is anyone familiar with the case of Sherri Papini? It baffles me. I can’t work out if she was just genuinely kidnapped or it was faked? It’s honestly an insane case. Kendall Rae has a good video of it on YouTube. It’s a really interesting case but beware you will become fixated
I remember this horrific case well from the time - and now the ringleader's being allowed to apply for parole.
Fordingbridge mansion massacre killer asks for parole after 33 years
George Stephenson was jailed for life in 1987 for massacring the Cleaver family at Burgate House, in Fordingbridge, Hants, on the evening of September 1, 1986.www.dailymail.co.uk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?